Correlation Between 552953CD1 and Nasdaq
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between MGM Resorts International and Nasdaq Inc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on 552953CD1 and Nasdaq and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in 552953CD1 with a short position of Nasdaq. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of 552953CD1 and Nasdaq.
Diversification Opportunities for 552953CD1 and Nasdaq
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between 552953CD1 and Nasdaq is -0.72. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding MGM Resorts International and Nasdaq Inc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Nasdaq Inc and 552953CD1 is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on MGM Resorts International are associated (or correlated) with Nasdaq. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Nasdaq Inc has no effect on the direction of 552953CD1 i.e., 552953CD1 and Nasdaq go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between 552953CD1 and Nasdaq
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon MGM Resorts International is expected to generate 33.18 times more return on investment than Nasdaq. However, 552953CD1 is 33.18 times more volatile than Nasdaq Inc. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Nasdaq Inc is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest 9,295 in MGM Resorts International on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 239.00 from holding MGM Resorts International or generate 2.57% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Against |
| Strength | Weak |
| Accuracy | 96.57% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
MGM Resorts International vs. Nasdaq Inc
Performance |
| Timeline |
| MGM Resorts International |
| Nasdaq Inc |
552953CD1 and Nasdaq Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with 552953CD1 and Nasdaq
The main advantage of trading using opposite 552953CD1 and Nasdaq positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if 552953CD1 position performs unexpectedly, Nasdaq can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Nasdaq will offset losses from the drop in Nasdaq's long position.| 552953CD1 vs. AEP TEX INC | 552953CD1 vs. US BANK NATIONAL | 552953CD1 vs. Nasdaq Inc | 552953CD1 vs. Vertiv Holdings Co |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Top Crypto Exchanges module to search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges.
Other Complementary Tools
| Economic Indicators Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing | |
| Portfolio Center All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios | |
| Portfolio Holdings Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing | |
| Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk |