Correlation Between National Health and Microsoft

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both National Health and Microsoft at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining National Health and Microsoft into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between National Health Investors and Microsoft, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on National Health and Microsoft and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in National Health with a short position of Microsoft. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of National Health and Microsoft.

Diversification Opportunities for National Health and Microsoft

0.11
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between National and Microsoft is 0.11. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding National Health Investors and Microsoft in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Microsoft and National Health is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on National Health Investors are associated (or correlated) with Microsoft. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Microsoft has no effect on the direction of National Health i.e., National Health and Microsoft go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between National Health and Microsoft

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon National Health Investors is expected to generate 1.3 times more return on investment than Microsoft. However, National Health is 1.3 times more volatile than Microsoft. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Microsoft is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,744  in National Health Investors on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,606  from holding National Health Investors or generate 27.96% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

National Health Investors  vs.  Microsoft

 Performance 
       Timeline  
National Health Investors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in National Health Investors are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, National Health is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively fragile technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

National Health and Microsoft Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with National Health and Microsoft

The main advantage of trading using opposite National Health and Microsoft positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if National Health position performs unexpectedly, Microsoft can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Microsoft will offset losses from the drop in Microsoft's long position.
The idea behind National Health Investors and Microsoft pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio