Progress Software Stock Piotroski F Score

PRGS Stock  USD 69.89  0.64  0.92%   
This module uses fundamental data of Progress Software to approximate its Piotroski F score. Progress Software F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Progress Software. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Progress Software financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out Progress Software Altman Z Score, Progress Software Correlation, Progress Software Valuation, as well as analyze Progress Software Alpha and Beta and Progress Software Hype Analysis.
For more information on how to buy Progress Stock please use our How to Invest in Progress Software guide.
  
At this time, Progress Software's Debt To Assets are comparatively stable compared to the past year. Long Term Debt To Capitalization is likely to gain to 0.57 in 2024, whereas Short and Long Term Debt is likely to drop slightly above 13.1 M in 2024. At this time, Progress Software's POCF Ratio is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Payout Ratio is likely to gain to 0.57 in 2024, whereas PTB Ratio is likely to drop 4.65 in 2024.
At this time, it appears that Progress Software's Piotroski F Score is Healthy. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
6.0
Piotroski F Score - Healthy
Current Return On Assets

Positive

Focus
Change in Return on Assets

Increased

Focus
Cash Flow Return on Assets

Positive

Focus
Current Quality of Earnings (accrual)

Improving

Focus
Asset Turnover Growth

Increase

Focus
Current Ratio Change

Increase

Focus
Long Term Debt Over Assets Change

Higher Leverage

Focus
Change In Outstending Shares

Increase

Focus
Change in Gross Margin

No Change

Focus

Progress Software Piotroski F Score Drivers

The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Progress Software is to make sure Progress is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Progress Software's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Progress Software's financial numbers are properly reported.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Asset Turnover0.850.5
Way Up
Pretty Stable
Gross Profit Margin0.620.74
Fairly Down
Pretty Stable
Total Current Liabilities425.2 M404.9 M
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Non Current Liabilities Total955.1 M909.6 M
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Total Assets1.9 B1.8 B
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile
Total Current Assets288.8 M380.4 M
Way Down
Pretty Stable
Total Cash From Operating Activities210 M200 M
Sufficiently Up
Slightly volatile

Progress Software F Score Driver Matrix

One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Progress Software's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Progress Software in a much-optimized way.

About Progress Software Piotroski F Score

F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.

Book Value Per Share

10.0

At this time, Progress Software's Book Value Per Share is comparatively stable compared to the past year.

Progress Software ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Progress Software's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Progress Software's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social

About Progress Software Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Progress Software's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Progress Software using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Progress Software based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Thematic Opportunities

Explore Investment Opportunities

Build portfolios using Macroaxis predefined set of investing ideas. Many of Macroaxis investing ideas can easily outperform a given market. Ideas can also be optimized per your risk profile before portfolio origination is invoked. Macroaxis thematic optimization helps investors identify companies most likely to benefit from changes or shifts in various micro-economic or local macro-level trends. Originating optimal thematic portfolios involves aligning investors' personal views, ideas, and beliefs with their actual investments.
Explore Investing Ideas  

Additional Tools for Progress Stock Analysis

When running Progress Software's price analysis, check to measure Progress Software's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Progress Software is operating at the current time. Most of Progress Software's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Progress Software's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Progress Software's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Progress Software to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.