Restaurant Brands International Stock Last Dividend Paid

QSR Stock

USD 69.84 0.06 0.09%

Restaurant Brands International fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Restaurant Brands' financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Restaurant Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Restaurant Brands' intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Restaurant Brands stock.

Other Current Liab Total Assets

This module does not cover all equities due to inconsistencies in global equity categorizations. Continue to Equity Screeners to view more equity screening tools.

Restaurant Brands International Company Last Dividend Paid Analysis

Restaurant Brands' Last Dividend Paid refers to dividend per share(DPS) paid to the shareholder the last time dividends were issued by a company. In its conventional sense, dividends refer to the distribution of some of a company's net earnings or capital gains decided by the board of directors.

Last Dividend

Last Profit Distribution Amount

Total Shares

More About Last Dividend Paid | All Equity Analysis

Current Restaurant Brands Last Dividend Paid

2.29

Most of Restaurant Brands' fundamental indicators, such as Last Dividend Paid, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Restaurant Brands International is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.

Restaurant Last Dividend Paid Driver Correlations

Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Restaurant Brands is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Restaurant Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Last Dividend Paid. Since Restaurant Brands' main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Restaurant Brands' historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Restaurant Brands' interrelated accounts and indicators.

	Total Assets	Total Stockholder Equity	Retained Earnings	Accounts Payable	Long Term Debt	Good Will	Short Term Investments	Total Liab	Intangible Assets	Common Stock	Property Plant Equipment	Net Debt	Net Receivables	Total Current Assets	Net Tangible Assets	Current Deferred Revenue	Deferred Long Term Liab	Long Term Investments	Short Long Term Debt	Short Term Debt	Long Term Debt Total	Cash And Equivalents	Net Invested Capital	Net Working Capital	Capital Stock
Total Assets		0.56	0.55	0.73	0.97	1.0	-0.82	0.98	0.99	0.98	0.91	0.95	0.9	0.84	-0.93	0.89	0.91	0.01	-0.92	0.32	0.64	-0.35	0.3	0.17	0.53
Total Stockholder Equity	0.56		0.06	0.17	0.36	0.53	-0.35	0.37	0.55	0.55	0.44	0.36	0.39	0.63	-0.38	0.52	0.72	0.53	-0.52	0.51	-0.17	0.15	0.0	-0.04	-0.05
Retained Earnings	0.55	0.06		0.93	0.61	0.53	-0.68	0.6	0.53	0.51	0.61	0.74	0.82	0.56	-0.66	0.78	0.54	-0.22	-0.66	0.0	0.85	-0.69	0.85	-0.13	0.29
Accounts Payable	0.73	0.17	0.93		0.78	0.72	-0.83	0.78	0.71	0.72	0.74	0.87	0.91	0.65	-0.81	0.84	0.7	-0.19	-0.83	0.01	0.85	-0.63	0.75	-0.03	0.46
Long Term Debt	0.97	0.36	0.61	0.78		0.98	-0.85	1.0	0.97	0.95	0.9	0.97	0.91	0.76	-0.94	0.87	0.83	-0.12	-0.9	0.19	0.76	-0.46	0.34	0.16	0.58
Good Will	1.0	0.53	0.53	0.72	0.98		-0.83	0.98	1.0	0.98	0.89	0.95	0.89	0.82	-0.94	0.88	0.91	0.0	-0.93	0.29	0.64	-0.38	0.26	0.16	0.51
Short Term Investments	-0.82	-0.35	-0.68	-0.83	-0.85	-0.83		-0.84	-0.83	-0.85	-0.71	-0.87	-0.81	-0.58	0.8	-0.78	-0.79	-0.06	0.94	0.19	-0.65	0.48	-0.4	-0.13	-0.43
Total Liab	0.98	0.37	0.6	0.78	1.0	0.98	-0.84		0.97	0.96	0.91	0.97	0.92	0.78	-0.94	0.87	0.83	-0.12	-0.9	0.22	0.76	-0.41	0.35	0.21	0.63
Intangible Assets	0.99	0.55	0.53	0.71	0.97	1.0	-0.83	0.97		0.97	0.89	0.94	0.88	0.81	-0.93	0.88	0.91	0.0	-0.92	0.31	0.62	-0.39	0.26	0.13	0.48
Common Stock	0.98	0.55	0.51	0.72	0.95	0.98	-0.85	0.96	0.97		0.86	0.93	0.87	0.83	-0.92	0.85	0.92	0.06	-0.94	0.23	0.59	-0.26	0.26	0.28	0.59
Property Plant Equipment	0.91	0.44	0.61	0.74	0.9	0.89	-0.71	0.91	0.89	0.86		0.89	0.93	0.79	-0.84	0.91	0.76	-0.1	-0.8	0.36	0.72	-0.36	0.52	0.08	0.54
Net Debt	0.95	0.36	0.74	0.87	0.97	0.95	-0.87	0.97	0.94	0.93	0.89		0.95	0.8	-0.96	0.91	0.86	-0.16	-0.93	0.21	0.8	-0.52	0.49	0.12	0.55
Net Receivables	0.9	0.39	0.82	0.91	0.91	0.89	-0.81	0.92	0.88	0.87	0.93	0.95		0.81	-0.89	0.96	0.81	-0.15	-0.88	0.24	0.83	-0.5	0.63	0.06	0.52
Total Current Assets	0.84	0.63	0.56	0.65	0.76	0.82	-0.58	0.78	0.81	0.83	0.79	0.8	0.81		-0.83	0.83	0.86	0.12	-0.76	0.6	0.5	-0.15	0.41	0.25	0.47
Net Tangible Assets	-0.93	-0.38	-0.66	-0.81	-0.94	-0.94	0.8	-0.94	-0.93	-0.92	-0.84	-0.96	-0.89	-0.83		-0.87	-0.89	0.16	0.92	-0.33	-0.73	0.53	-0.4	-0.13	-0.47
Current Deferred Revenue	0.89	0.52	0.78	0.84	0.87	0.88	-0.78	0.87	0.88	0.85	0.91	0.91	0.96	0.83	-0.87		0.87	0.0	-0.88	0.32	0.73	-0.53	0.59	-0.07	0.33
Deferred Long Term Liab	0.91	0.72	0.54	0.7	0.83	0.91	-0.79	0.83	0.91	0.92	0.76	0.86	0.81	0.86	-0.89	0.87		0.16	-0.94	0.38	0.44	-0.34	0.27	0.11	0.29
Long Term Investments	0.01	0.53	-0.22	-0.19	-0.12	0.0	-0.06	-0.12	0.0	0.06	-0.1	-0.16	-0.15	0.12	0.16	0.0	0.16		-0.07	-0.05	-0.46	0.28	-0.26	-0.07	-0.26
Short Long Term Debt	-0.92	-0.52	-0.66	-0.83	-0.9	-0.93	0.94	-0.9	-0.92	-0.94	-0.8	-0.93	-0.88	-0.76	0.92	-0.88	-0.94	-0.07		-0.1	-0.62	0.46	-0.38	-0.12	-0.41
Short Term Debt	0.32	0.51	0.0	0.01	0.19	0.29	0.19	0.22	0.31	0.23	0.36	0.21	0.24	0.6	-0.33	0.32	0.38	-0.05	-0.1		-0.03	0.08	0.08	-0.05	0.0
Long Term Debt Total	0.64	-0.17	0.85	0.85	0.76	0.64	-0.65	0.76	0.62	0.59	0.72	0.8	0.83	0.5	-0.73	0.73	0.44	-0.46	-0.62	-0.03		-0.67	0.67	0.06	0.55
Cash And Equivalents	-0.35	0.15	-0.69	-0.63	-0.46	-0.38	0.48	-0.41	-0.39	-0.26	-0.36	-0.52	-0.5	-0.15	0.53	-0.53	-0.34	0.28	0.46	0.08	-0.67		-0.45	0.54	0.18
Net Invested Capital	0.3	0.0	0.85	0.75	0.34	0.26	-0.4	0.35	0.26	0.26	0.52	0.49	0.63	0.41	-0.4	0.59	0.27	-0.26	-0.38	0.08	0.67	-0.45		-0.22	0.28
Net Working Capital	0.17	-0.04	-0.13	-0.03	0.16	0.16	-0.13	0.21	0.13	0.28	0.08	0.12	0.06	0.25	-0.13	-0.07	0.11	-0.07	-0.12	-0.05	0.06	0.54	-0.22		0.65
Capital Stock	0.53	-0.05	0.29	0.46	0.58	0.51	-0.43	0.63	0.48	0.59	0.54	0.55	0.52	0.47	-0.47	0.33	0.29	-0.26	-0.41	0.0	0.55	0.18	0.28	0.65

Click cells to compare fundamentals

Many stable companies today pay out dividends to their shareholders in the form of the income distribution, but high-growth firms rarely offer dividends because all of their earnings are reinvested back to the business.

Competition

Predict Restaurant Brands

Based on the recorded statements, Restaurant Brands International has a Last Dividend Paid of 2.29. This is much higher than that of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure sector and significantly higher than that of the Consumer Discretionary industry. The last dividend paid for all United States stocks is notably lower than that of the firm.

Restaurant Last Dividend Paid Peer Comparison

Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Restaurant Brands' direct or indirect competition against its Last Dividend Paid to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Restaurant Brands could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Restaurant Brands by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.

Restaurant Brands is currently under evaluation in last dividend paid category among its peers.

Restaurant Brands ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Restaurant Brands' sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Restaurant Brands' managers, analysts, and investors.

Environmental

Governance

Social

Restaurant Fundamentals

	Return On Equity	0.37
	Return On Asset	0.0586
	Profit Margin	0.16 %
	Operating Margin	0.27 %
	Current Valuation	37.41 B
	Shares Outstanding	323.71 M
	Shares Owned By Insiders	1.23 %
	Shares Owned By Institutions	88.25 %
	Number Of Shares Shorted	5.38 M
	Price To Earning	39.12 X
	Price To Book	6.98 X
	Price To Sales	3.96 X
	Revenue	7.02 B
	Gross Profit	2.6 B
	EBITDA	2.45 B
	Net Income	1.21 B
	Cash And Equivalents	1.18 B
	Cash Per Share	2.74 X
	Total Debt	14.52 B
	Debt To Equity	3.71 %
	Current Ratio	0.89 X
	Book Value Per Share	10.00 X
	Cash Flow From Operations	1.32 B
	Short Ratio	4.38 X
	Earnings Per Share	3.99 X
	Price To Earnings To Growth	1.79 X
	Target Price	81.9
	Number Of Employees	9 K
	Beta	0.96
	Market Capitalization	31.44 B
	Total Asset	23.39 B
	Retained Earnings	1.6 B
	Working Capital	29 M
	Current Asset	1.37 B
	Current Liabilities	1.12 B
	Annual Yield	0.03 %
	Five Year Return	3.08 %
	Net Asset	23.39 B
	Last Dividend Paid	2.29

About Restaurant Brands Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Restaurant Brands International's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Restaurant Brands using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Restaurant Brands International based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.

Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Pair Trading with Restaurant Brands

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Restaurant Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Restaurant Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Moving against Restaurant Stock

0.5

LNW

Light Wonder

Pair Corr

The ability to find closely correlated positions to Restaurant Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Restaurant Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Restaurant Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Restaurant Brands International to buy it.

The correlation of Restaurant Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Restaurant Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Restaurant Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.

Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Restaurant Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.

Pair Correlation Correlation Matching

Additional Tools for Restaurant Stock Analysis

When running Restaurant Brands' price analysis, check to measure Restaurant Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Restaurant Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Restaurant Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Restaurant Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Restaurant Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Restaurant Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.

Macroaxis helps investors of all levels and skills to maximize the upside of all their holdings and minimize the risk associated with market volatility, economic swings, and company-specific events. View terms and conditions

Feedback Blog

Made with optimal in San Francisco

2024 Macroaxis LLC