Compare Net Debt To E B I T D A Across Equities
You can use any or all of fundamental ratio historical patterns as a complementary method for asset selection as well as a tool for deciding entry and exit points. Many technical investors use fundamentals to limit their universe of possible positions. Check out your portfolio center.
Cross Equities Net Debt To E B I T D A Analysis
Compare Marcus Millichap, Jones Lang LaSalle, and CBRE Group Class Net Debt To E B I T D A Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMI | (0.1195) | (0.1195) | (0.0598) | (3.6416) | (1.5676) | (0.7255) | (1.6025) | (2.0898) | (1.7459) | (1.3902) | (2.5507) | (1.516) | (1.0207) | 3.0009 | 3.15 |
| JLL | 1.9775 | 0.8808 | 1.1322 | 0.6463 | 0.2087 | 0.9312 | 2.3638 | 1.0674 | 0.5637 | 1.7612 | 2.7255 | 1.506 | 2.1807 | 2.9564 | 3.1 |
| CBRE | 8.4139 | 3.6098 | 3.313 | 2.3924 | 1.4581 | 2.9633 | 2.2157 | 1.4465 | 1.5134 | 1.6958 | 1.4943 | 0.606 | 1.1206 | 2.112 | 3.01 |
| CIGI | 1.2286 | 2.8984 | 2.0494 | 2.7102 | 2.6862 | 0.8271 | 0.7673 | 0.6008 | 1.8043 | 2.3302 | 3.6219 | 36.1938 | 3.1337 | 3.4737 | 2.47 |
| FRPH | 0.3571 | 2.2757 | 1.5263 | 1.9186 | 2.4707 | 1.7303 | 1.7303 | 4.2783 | 5.1772 | 6.2568 | 3.0453 | 1.8243 | 0.0528 | 0.9391 | 1.47 |
| FSV | 1.8206 | 2.8984 | 2.2246 | 3.0125 | 2.355 | 1.5428 | 1.6266 | 1.369 | 1.4509 | 2.0927 | 2.0927 | 2.1032 | 2.4453 | 3.1174 | 1.69 |
| NEN | 1.2018 | 7.9039 | 6.8932 | 10.0545 | 15.2976 | 8.9843 | 8.0674 | 14.7323 | 13.5548 | 8.7405 | 8.4016 | 9.9418 | 10.2841 | 10.6794 | 11.21 |
Marcus Millichap, Jones Lang LaSalle, and CBRE Group Class Net Debt To E B I T D A description
A leverage ratio that indicates a company's ability to pay off its incurred debt. It compares a company's net debt (total debt minus cash) to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA).Generate Optimal Portfolios
The classical approach to portfolio optimization is known as Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT). It involves categorizing the investment universe based on risk (standard deviation) and return, and then choosing the mix of investments that achieves the desired risk-versus-return tradeoff. Portfolio optimization can also be thought of as a risk-management strategy as every type of equity has a distinct return and risk characteristics as well as different systemic risks, which describes how they respond to the market at large. Macroaxis enables investors to optimize portfolios that have a mix of equities (such as stocks, funds, or ETFs) and cryptocurrencies (such as Bitcoin, Ethereum or Monero)
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Odds Of Bankruptcy module to get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years.
Other Complementary Tools
| Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
| USA ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA | |
| Sectors List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities | |
| Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies | |
| Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum |