Compare Operating Cash Flow Per Share Across Equities
You can use any or all of fundamental ratio historical patterns as a complementary method for asset selection as well as a tool for deciding entry and exit points. Many technical investors use fundamentals to limit their universe of possible positions. Check out your portfolio center.
Cross Equities Operating Cash Flow Per Share Analysis
Compare Gladstone Capital, PennantPark Floating Rate, and Horizon Technology Operating Cash Flow Per Share Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLAD | (0.0076) | 1.2481 | 3.0605 | 0.045 | (7.0707) | 5.1742 | (1.0102) | (1.2966) | 0.6324 | (2.9697) | (0.8462) | (4.4482) | (0.5821) | 0.1488 | 0.16 |
| PFLT | (16.5955) | (6.9812) | (12.9753) | (1.4934) | (0.1354) | (6.1901) | (2.5339) | (5.4382) | (3.1316) | (0.1274) | 1.2784 | (1.2168) | 2.7567 | 2.48 | 2.61 |
| HRZN | 1.0561 | (0.5286) | (4.255) | 0.6782 | 3.8121 | (2.8021) | 4.5315 | (1.2886) | (1.046) | (3.814) | (1.4418) | (3.7944) | (9.9602) | 1.6175 | 1.7 |
| PSEC | (12.0096) | (3.9202) | (8.7463) | (5.7459) | 0.1286 | 2.4201 | 1.0484 | 1.0212 | 0.6116 | 1.1667 | 0.0811 | (2.0363) | (0.5542) | 0.659 | 0.69 |
| HTGC | (14.9274) | (3.2457) | (3.9524) | 1.7607 | (0.4289) | (1.646) | (1.8763) | (0.223) | (2.7381) | (2.3797) | 1.8556 | 1.121 | (3.3933) | 0.4739 | 0.5 |
| FSK | 0.0 | (17.6386) | (25.3064) | (0.0097) | 2.6321 | 2.8961 | 8.642 | 1.0826 | 4.4555 | (1.9732) | 5.4308 | (3.0188) | 3.9046 | 4.938 | 5.18 |
| GAIN | (9.036) | (2.2043) | (1.6426) | (1.2695) | (3.6583) | 0.1349 | 1.0729 | (0.8933) | 2.8535 | 1.0743 | (0.8962) | 1.1022 | (0.1352) | (2.0291) | (1.93) |
Gladstone Capital, PennantPark Floating Rate, and Horizon Technology Operating Cash Flow Per Share description
A measure of the cash generated from a company's normal business operations per share, indicating how much cash is generated from a company's business operations on a per-share basis.Generate Optimal Portfolios
The classical approach to portfolio optimization is known as Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT). It involves categorizing the investment universe based on risk (standard deviation) and return, and then choosing the mix of investments that achieves the desired risk-versus-return tradeoff. Portfolio optimization can also be thought of as a risk-management strategy as every type of equity has a distinct return and risk characteristics as well as different systemic risks, which describes how they respond to the market at large. Macroaxis enables investors to optimize portfolios that have a mix of equities (such as stocks, funds, or ETFs) and cryptocurrencies (such as Bitcoin, Ethereum or Monero)
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.
Other Complementary Tools
| Portfolio Comparator Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account | |
| Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
| Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
| Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Portfolio Holdings Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing |