Martin Marietta Operating Margin vs. Net Income
| MLM Stock | USD 685.94 10.54 1.56% |
Martin Marietta Operating Profit Margin |
|
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.26 | 0.2998 |
|
| |||||
| Net Profit Margin | 0.18 | 0.1737 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.13 | 0.2326 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.11 | 0.1968 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Assets | 0.0677 | 0.0608 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Equity | 0.14 | 0.1133 |
|
|
For Martin Marietta profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Martin Marietta to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Martin Marietta Materials utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Martin Marietta's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Martin Marietta Materials over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
Check out Correlation Analysis. Will Construction Materials sector continue expanding? Could Martin diversify its offerings? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Martin Marietta. Expected growth trajectory for Martin significantly influences the price investors are willing to assign. Accurate valuation requires analyzing both current fundamentals and future growth trajectories. Every Martin Marietta data point contributes insight, yet successful analysis hinges on identifying the most consequential variables.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.04) | Dividend Share 3.24 | Earnings Share 19.45 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.06) |
The market value of Martin Marietta Materials is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Martin that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Martin Marietta's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Martin Marietta's true underlying value. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. Because Martin Marietta's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Martin Marietta's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Understanding that Martin Marietta's value differs from its trading price is crucial, as each reflects different aspects of the company. Evaluating whether Martin Marietta represents a sound investment requires analyzing earnings trends, revenue growth, technical signals, industry dynamics, and expert forecasts. Meanwhile, Martin Marietta's quoted price indicates the marketplace figure where supply meets demand through bilateral consent.
Martin Marietta Materials Net Income vs. Operating Margin Fundamental Analysis
Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Martin Marietta's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Martin Marietta value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth. Martin Marietta Materials is regarded fifth in operating margin category among its peers. It also is regarded fifth in net income category among its peers making up about 5,026,525,199 of Net Income per Operating Margin. At this time, Martin Marietta's Operating Profit Margin is very stable compared to the past year. Comparative valuation analysis is a catch-all technique that is used if you cannot value Martin Marietta by discounting back its dividends or cash flows. It compares the stock's price multiples to nearest competition to determine if the stock is relatively undervalued or overvalued.Martin Net Income vs. Operating Margin
Operating Margin shows how much operating income a company makes on each dollar of sales. It is one of the profitability indicators which helps analysts to understand whether the firm is successful or not making money from everyday operations.
Martin Marietta |
| = | 0.23 % |
A good Operating Margin is required for a company to be able to pay for its fixed costs or payout its debt, which implies that the higher the margin, the better. This ratio is most effective in evaluating the earning potential of a company over time when comparing it against a firm's competitors.
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
Martin Marietta |
| = | 1.14 B |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
Martin Net Income Comparison
Martin Marietta is currently under evaluation in net income category among its peers.
Martin Marietta Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Martin Marietta, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Martin Marietta will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Martin Marietta's change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Martin Marietta, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -14.9 M | -15.7 M | |
| Operating Income | 1.5 B | 1.6 B | |
| Income Before Tax | 1.3 B | 1.4 B | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -234 M | -222.3 M | |
| Net Income | 1.1 B | 1.2 B | |
| Income Tax Expense | 250 M | 262.5 M | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 1.1 B | 1.2 B | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 2.3 B | 2.4 B | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | 61.4 M | 64.5 M | |
| Interest Income | 230 M | 151 M | |
| Net Interest Income | -152.1 M | -159.7 M | |
| Change To Netincome | 35 M | 21.3 M | |
| Net Income Per Share | 18.86 | 19.80 | |
| Income Quality | 1.57 | 2.10 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.88 | 0.59 |
Martin Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Martin Marietta. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Martin Marietta position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Martin Marietta's important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.
Martin Marietta Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The calculation of Martin Marietta's earning per share is based on the data from the past 12 consecutive months, used for reporting the company's financial figures. The next projected EPS of Martin Marietta is estimated to be 2.488 with the future projection ranging from a low of 2.05 to a high of 3.17. Please be aware that this consensus of annual earnings estimates for Martin Marietta Materials is based on EPS before non-recurring items and includes expenses related to employee stock options.Last Reported EPS
2.05 Lowest | Expected EPS | 3.17 Highest |
Martin Marietta Earnings Projection Consensus
Suppose the current estimates of Martin Marietta's value are higher than the current market price of the Martin Marietta stock. In this case, investors may conclude that Martin Marietta is overpriced and will exhibit bullish sentiment. On the other hand, if the present value is lower than the stock price, analysts may conclude that the market undervalues the equity. These scenarios may suggest that the market is not as efficient as it should be at the estimation time, and Martin Marietta's stock will quickly adjusts to the new information provided by the consensus estimate.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of March 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 23 | 89.31% | 4.62 | 2.488 | 19.45 |
Martin Marietta Earnings History
Earnings estimate consensus by Martin Marietta Materials analysts from Wall Street is used by the market to judge Martin Marietta's stock performance. Investors also use these earnings estimates to evaluate and project the stock performance into the future in order to make their investment decisions. However, we suggest analyzing not only Martin Marietta's upcoming profit reports and earnings-per-share forecasts but also comparing them to our different valuation methods.Martin Marietta Quarterly Gross Profit |
|
Martin Marietta Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual Earning per Share of Martin Marietta refers to what the company shows during its earnings calls or quarterly reports. The Expected EPS is what analysts covering Martin Marietta Materials predict the company's earnings will be in the future. The higher the earnings per share of Martin Marietta, the better is its profitability. While calculating the Earning per Share, we use the weighted ratio, as the number of shares outstanding can change over time.Martin Marietta Estimated Months Earnings per Share
For an investor who is primarily interested in generating an income out of investing in entities such as Martin Marietta, the EPS ratio can tell if the company is intending to increase its current dividend. Although EPS is an essential tool for investors, it should not be used in isolation. EPS of Martin Marietta should always be considered in relation to other companies to make a more educated investment decision.Martin Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Earnings surprises can significantly impact Martin Marietta's stock price both in the short term and over time. Negative earnings surprises usually result in a price decline. However, it has been seen that positive earnings surprises lead to an immediate rise in a stock's price and a gradual increase over time. This is why we often hear news about some companies beating earning projections. Financial analysts spend a large amount of time predicting earnings per share (EPS) along with other important future indicators. Many analysts use forecasting models, management guidance, and additional fundamental information to derive an EPS estimate.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-02-18 | 2025-12-31 | 4.84 | 4.62 | -0.22 | 4 | ||
2025-10-28 | 2025-09-30 | 6.64 | 6.85 | 0.21 | 3 | ||
2025-08-07 | 2025-06-30 | 5.35 | 5.43 | 0.08 | 1 | ||
2025-04-28 | 2025-03-31 | 1.83 | 1.9273 | 0.0973 | 5 | ||
2025-02-12 | 2024-12-31 | 4.5586 | 4.8097 | 0.2511 | 5 | ||
2024-10-30 | 2024-09-30 | 6.28 | 5.91 | -0.37 | 5 | ||
2024-08-08 | 2024-06-30 | 5.36 | 4.76 | -0.6 | 11 | ||
2024-04-30 | 2024-03-31 | 1.83 | 1.93 | 0.1 | 5 | ||
2024-02-14 | 2023-12-31 | 3.99 | 4.63 | 0.64 | 16 | ||
2023-11-01 | 2023-09-30 | 6.06 | 6.94 | 0.88 | 14 | ||
2023-07-27 | 2023-06-30 | 4.86 | 5.6 | 0.74 | 15 | ||
2023-05-04 | 2023-03-31 | 0.98 | 2.16 | 1.18 | 120 | ||
2023-02-15 | 2022-12-31 | 3.07 | 3.04 | -0.03 | 0 | ||
2022-11-02 | 2022-09-30 | 4.63 | 4.69 | 0.06 | 1 | ||
2022-07-28 | 2022-06-30 | 3.74 | 3.96 | 0.22 | 5 | ||
2022-05-03 | 2022-03-31 | 0.67 | 0.41 | -0.26 | 38 | ||
2022-02-10 | 2021-12-31 | 2.91 | 3.15 | 0.24 | 8 | ||
2021-11-02 | 2021-09-30 | 4.24 | 4.25 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2021-07-29 | 2021-06-30 | 3.84 | 3.81 | -0.03 | 0 | ||
2021-05-04 | 2021-03-31 | 0.5 | 1.04 | 0.54 | 108 | ||
2021-02-09 | 2020-12-31 | 2.3 | 2.93 | 0.63 | 27 | ||
2020-10-29 | 2020-09-30 | 3.76 | 3.85 | 0.09 | 2 | ||
2020-07-28 | 2020-06-30 | 3.02 | 3.49 | 0.47 | 15 | ||
2020-05-05 | 2020-03-31 | 0.49 | 0.41 | -0.08 | 16 | ||
2020-02-11 | 2019-12-31 | 2.19 | 2.09 | -0.1 | 4 | ||
2019-10-29 | 2019-09-30 | 3.51 | 3.96 | 0.45 | 12 | ||
2019-07-30 | 2019-06-30 | 3.18 | 3.2 | 0.02 | 0 | ||
2019-04-30 | 2019-03-31 | 0.34 | 0.47 | 0.13 | 38 | ||
2019-02-12 | 2018-12-31 | 1.74 | 1.5 | -0.24 | 13 | ||
2018-11-06 | 2018-09-30 | 2.78 | 3.06 | 0.28 | 10 | ||
2018-07-26 | 2018-06-30 | 2.85 | 3.04 | 0.19 | 6 | ||
2018-05-08 | 2018-03-31 | 0.22 | 0.16 | -0.06 | 27 | ||
2018-02-13 | 2017-12-31 | 1.47 | 1.88 | 0.41 | 27 | ||
2017-11-02 | 2017-09-30 | 2.45 | 2.39 | -0.06 | 2 | ||
2017-08-01 | 2017-06-30 | 2.36 | 2.25 | -0.11 | 4 | ||
2017-05-02 | 2017-03-31 | 0.4 | 0.67 | 0.27 | 67 | ||
2017-02-14 | 2016-12-31 | 1.62 | 1.55 | -0.07 | 4 | ||
2016-11-01 | 2016-09-30 | 2.61 | 2.49 | -0.12 | 4 | ||
2016-08-02 | 2016-06-30 | 2 | 1.9 | -0.1 | 5 | ||
2016-05-05 | 2016-03-31 | 0.36 | 0.69 | 0.33 | 91 | ||
2016-02-09 | 2015-12-31 | 1.35 | 1.15 | -0.2 | 14 | ||
2015-11-03 | 2015-09-30 | 2.15 | 2.04 | -0.11 | 5 | ||
2015-08-04 | 2015-06-30 | 1.61 | 1.24 | -0.37 | 22 | ||
2015-04-30 | 2015-03-31 | 0.11 | 0.09 | -0.02 | 18 | ||
2015-02-10 | 2014-12-31 | 0.82 | 0.99 | 0.17 | 20 | ||
2014-10-28 | 2014-09-30 | 1.7 | 1.45 | -0.25 | 14 | ||
2014-07-29 | 2014-06-30 | 1.31 | 1.34 | 0.03 | 2 | ||
2014-04-29 | 2014-03-31 | -0.34 | -0.35 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2014-01-28 | 2013-12-31 | 0.7 | 0.78 | 0.08 | 11 | ||
2013-11-07 | 2013-09-30 | 1.47 | 1.55 | 0.08 | 5 | ||
2013-07-30 | 2013-06-30 | 1.13 | 0.88 | -0.25 | 22 | ||
2013-04-30 | 2013-03-31 | -0.36 | -0.6 | -0.24 | 66 | ||
2013-02-12 | 2012-12-31 | 0.48 | 0.46 | -0.02 | 4 | ||
2012-11-06 | 2012-09-30 | 1.26 | 1.36 | 0.1 | 7 | ||
2012-07-31 | 2012-06-30 | 1 | 0.91 | -0.09 | 9 | ||
2012-05-01 | 2012-03-31 | -0.24 | -0.29 | -0.05 | 20 | ||
2012-02-07 | 2011-12-31 | 0.39 | 0.38 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2011-11-01 | 2011-09-30 | 1.09 | 1.11 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2011-08-02 | 2011-06-30 | 1.08 | 0.78 | -0.3 | 27 | ||
2011-05-03 | 2011-03-31 | -0.37 | -0.39 | -0.02 | 5 | ||
2011-02-08 | 2010-12-31 | 0.2 | 0.32 | 0.12 | 60 | ||
2010-11-02 | 2010-09-30 | 1.16 | 1.13 | -0.03 | 2 | ||
2010-08-03 | 2010-06-30 | 1.17 | 1.18 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2010-05-04 | 2010-03-31 | -0.34 | -0.54 | -0.2 | 58 | ||
2010-02-09 | 2009-12-31 | 0.33 | -0.07 | -0.4 | 121 | ||
2009-11-03 | 2009-09-30 | 1.18 | 1.23 | 0.05 | 4 | ||
2009-08-04 | 2009-06-30 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 0.08 | 10 | ||
2009-05-05 | 2009-03-31 | 0.14 | -0.14 | -0.28 | 200 | ||
2009-02-12 | 2008-12-31 | 0.83 | 0.61 | -0.22 | 26 | ||
2008-10-28 | 2008-09-30 | 1.59 | 1.58 | -0.01 | 0 | ||
2008-08-07 | 2008-06-30 | 1.84 | 1.39 | -0.45 | 24 | ||
2008-05-06 | 2008-03-31 | 0.64 | 0.51 | -0.13 | 20 | ||
2008-02-05 | 2007-12-31 | 1.55 | 1.34 | -0.21 | 13 | ||
2007-10-30 | 2007-09-30 | 2.04 | 2.11 | 0.07 | 3 | ||
2007-08-07 | 2007-06-30 | 2 | 1.91 | -0.09 | 4 | ||
2007-05-08 | 2007-03-31 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2007-02-08 | 2006-12-31 | 1.34 | 1.36 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2006-10-31 | 2006-09-30 | 1.62 | 1.57 | -0.05 | 3 | ||
2006-08-01 | 2006-06-30 | 1.65 | 1.63 | -0.02 | 1 | ||
2006-05-02 | 2006-03-31 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 0.07 | 12 | ||
2006-02-09 | 2005-12-31 | 0.9 | 1.04 | 0.14 | 15 | ||
2005-11-01 | 2005-09-30 | 1.44 | 1.47 | 0.03 | 2 | ||
2005-08-01 | 2005-06-30 | 1.29 | 1.3 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2005-05-02 | 2005-03-31 | 0.1 | 0.17 | 0.07 | 70 | ||
2005-02-09 | 2004-12-31 | 0.7 | 0.74 | 0.04 | 5 | ||
2004-11-01 | 2004-09-30 | 1.01 | 1.09 | 0.08 | 7 | ||
2004-08-03 | 2004-06-30 | 0.92 | 0.91 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2004-05-04 | 2004-03-31 | -0.15 | -0.14 | 0.01 | 6 | ||
2004-02-04 | 2003-12-31 | 0.56 | 0.6 | 0.04 | 7 | ||
2003-10-30 | 2003-09-30 | 0.9 | 0.93 | 0.03 | 3 | ||
2003-07-30 | 2003-06-30 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.08 | 10 | ||
2003-04-29 | 2003-03-31 | -0.28 | -0.29 | -0.01 | 3 | ||
2003-01-30 | 2002-12-31 | 0.34 | 0.33 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2002-10-31 | 2002-09-30 | 0.81 | 0.8 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2002-07-25 | 2002-06-30 | 0.84 | 1.09 | 0.25 | 29 | ||
2002-04-25 | 2002-03-31 | -0.2 | -0.22 | -0.02 | 10 | ||
2002-01-30 | 2001-12-31 | 0.64 | 0.52 | -0.12 | 18 | ||
2001-10-23 | 2001-09-30 | 1.01 | 0.95 | -0.06 | 5 | ||
2001-07-25 | 2001-06-30 | 0.83 | 0.82 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2001-04-24 | 2001-03-31 | -0.03 | -0.1 | -0.07 | 233 | ||
2001-01-24 | 2000-12-31 | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2000-10-17 | 2000-09-30 | 1.21 | 0.9 | -0.31 | 25 | ||
2000-07-18 | 2000-06-30 | 0.94 | 0.9 | -0.04 | 4 | ||
2000-04-18 | 2000-03-31 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 14 | ||
2000-01-26 | 1999-12-31 | 0.64 | 0.7 | 0.06 | 9 | ||
1999-10-19 | 1999-09-30 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
1999-07-20 | 1999-06-30 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
1999-04-20 | 1999-03-31 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 0.1 | 142 | ||
1999-01-26 | 1998-12-31 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.03 | 4 | ||
1998-10-22 | 1998-09-30 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.03 | 3 | ||
1998-07-21 | 1998-06-30 | 0.79 | 0.78 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
1998-04-21 | 1998-03-31 | 0.09 | 0.06 | -0.03 | 33 | ||
1998-01-21 | 1997-12-31 | 0.47 | 0.5 | 0.03 | 6 | ||
1997-10-21 | 1997-09-30 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.08 | 11 | ||
1997-07-22 | 1997-06-30 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.04 | 6 | ||
1997-04-22 | 1997-03-31 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 26 | ||
1997-01-22 | 1996-12-31 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
1996-10-21 | 1996-09-30 | 0.63 | 0.6 | -0.03 | 4 | ||
1996-07-22 | 1996-06-30 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.09 | 18 | ||
1996-04-23 | 1996-03-31 | 0.15 | 0.09 | -0.06 | 40 |
Use Martin Marietta in pair-trading
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Martin Marietta position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Martin Marietta will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Martin Marietta Pair Trading
Martin Marietta Materials Pair Trading Analysis
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Martin Marietta could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Martin Marietta when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Martin Marietta - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Martin Marietta Materials to buy it.
The correlation of Martin Marietta is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Martin Marietta moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Martin Marietta Materials moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Martin Marietta can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Martin Marietta position
In addition to having Martin Marietta in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Chemicals Makers Thematic Idea Now
Chemicals Makers
Companies developing chemicals for crops, soil as well as human, and animals. The Chemicals Makers theme has 15 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Chemicals Makers Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Correlation Analysis. You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.
To fully project Martin Marietta's future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of Martin Marietta Materials at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include Martin Marietta's income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.