Gold Competitors
| GFI Stock | USD 54.60 2.45 4.70% |
Gold Fields vs Sitka Gold Correlation
Excellent diversification
The correlation between Gold Fields Ltd and SITKF is -0.54 (i.e., Excellent diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Gold Fields Ltd and SITKF in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving together with Gold Stock
| 0.85 | B | Barrick Mining Symbol Change | PairCorr |
| 0.84 | BP60 | ALMA METALS LTD | PairCorr |
| 0.8 | AA | Alcoa Corp | PairCorr |
| 0.96 | AG | First Majestic Silver Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
Moving against Gold Stock
The current Return On Tangible Assets is estimated to decrease to 0.11. The current Return On Capital Employed is estimated to decrease to 0.25. As of now, Gold Fields' Total Current Assets are increasing as compared to previous years. The Gold Fields' current Other Assets is estimated to increase to about 786.1 M, while Other Current Assets are projected to decrease to under 68 M.Gold Fields Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Gold Fields and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Gold and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Gold Fields does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Gold Stock performing well and Gold Fields Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Gold Fields' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLAD | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| AMNE | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| SMAS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| MSTSX | 0.65 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 0.34 | 1.45 | 12.34 | |||
| LBHIX | 0.13 | 0.04 | (0.12) | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 2.15 | |||
| VIASP | 0.28 | 0.04 | (0.06) | 2.64 | 0.26 | 0.68 | 2.04 | |||
| RRTLX | 0.28 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.20 | 0.05 | 0.58 | 3.30 | |||
| WQTM | 1.78 | (0.15) | 0.00 | (0.04) | 0.00 | 3.48 | 9.00 | |||
| OSHDF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| SITKF | 2.72 | (0.29) | 0.00 | (0.19) | 0.00 | 4.55 | 16.83 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare Gold Fields and related stocks such as Cabal Communications, American Green Group, and Somatic Systems Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLAD | (3.6 M) | (908.6 K) | (908.6 K) | (908.6 K) | (908.6 K) | (908.6 K) | (908.6 K) | (908.6 K) | (908.6 K) | (908.6 K) | (908.6 K) | (908.6 K) | (908.6 K) | (908.6 K) | (908.6 K) | (1 M) | (1.1 M) |
| AMNE | (31.4 M) | (345.9 K) | (345.9 K) | (345.9 K) | (345.9 K) | (345.9 K) | (345.9 K) | (345.9 K) | (345.9 K) | (345.9 K) | (345.9 K) | (345.9 K) | (345.9 K) | (345.9 K) | (345.9 K) | (397.7 K) | (417.6 K) |
| SMAS | (143.8 K) | (239.1 K) | (239.1 K) | (239.1 K) | (239.1 K) | (239.1 K) | (239.1 K) | (239.1 K) | (239.1 K) | (239.1 K) | (239.1 K) | (239.1 K) | (239.1 K) | (239.1 K) | (239.1 K) | (215.2 K) | (225.9 K) |
Gold Fields and related stocks such as Cabal Communications, American Green Group, and Somatic Systems Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Gold Fields financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Gold Fields Ltd operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Gold Fields Competitive Analysis
The better you understand Gold Fields competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Gold Fields' competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Gold Fields' competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Gold Fields Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of Gold Fields Competition
Gold Fields' competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Gold Fields in relation to its competition. Gold Fields' competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Gold Fields in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Gold Fields' competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Gold Fields, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your Gold Fields position
In addition to having Gold Fields in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Energy ETFs Thematic Idea Now
Energy ETFs
ETF themes focus on helping investors to gain exposure to a broad range of assets, diversify, and lower overall costs. The Energy ETFs theme has 100 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Energy ETFs Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Gold Fields Correlation with its peers. You can also try the Premium Stories module to follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope.
Is there potential for Metals & Mining market expansion? Will Gold introduce new products? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Gold Fields. Market participants price Gold higher when confident in its future expansion prospects. Understanding fair value requires weighing current performance against future potential. All the valuation information about Gold Fields listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 1.633 | Dividend Share 0.759 | Earnings Share 2.09 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.637 |
Investors evaluate Gold Fields using market value (trading price) and book value (balance sheet equity), each telling a different story. Calculating Gold Fields' intrinsic value - the estimated true worth - helps identify when the stock trades at a discount or premium to fair value. Analysts utilize numerous techniques to assess fundamental value, seeking to purchase shares when trading prices fall beneath estimated intrinsic worth. External factors like market trends, sector rotation, and investor psychology can cause Gold Fields' market price to deviate significantly from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Gold Fields' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Gold Fields is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. Conversely, Gold Fields' market price signifies the transaction level at which participants voluntarily complete trades.