Inno Competitors
| INHD Stock | 1.14 0.05 4.59% |
Inno Holdings vs Jewett Cameron Correlation
Poor diversification
The correlation between Inno Holdings Common and JCTC is 0.6 (i.e., Poor diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Inno Holdings Common and JCTC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving against Inno Stock
| 0.85 | CRH | CRH PLC ADR | PairCorr |
| 0.75 | JHX | James Hardie Industries | PairCorr |
| 0.74 | CX | Cemex SAB de Aggressive Push | PairCorr |
| 0.73 | SRC | Sigmaroc PLC | PairCorr |
| 0.63 | EXP | Eagle Materials | PairCorr |
Inno Holdings Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Inno Holdings and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Inno and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Inno Holdings Common does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Inno Stock performing well and Inno Holdings Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Inno Holdings' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GURE | 8.79 | 1.15 | 0.12 | 0.59 | 8.73 | 20.00 | 105.51 | |||
| ZKIN | 4.81 | (0.57) | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 12.35 | 44.31 | |||
| SEED | 3.54 | (0.38) | 0.00 | (0.41) | 0.00 | 8.97 | 21.85 | |||
| FMSTW | 6.32 | 0.24 | 0.02 | (0.36) | 7.60 | 13.16 | 44.23 | |||
| CAPS | 4.29 | (0.93) | 0.00 | (2.40) | 0.00 | 8.86 | 24.19 | |||
| ITP | 2.49 | (0.33) | 0.00 | (0.22) | 0.00 | 5.26 | 18.61 | |||
| CNEY | 5.75 | (0.37) | 0.00 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 10.00 | 68.03 | |||
| ENFY | 8.41 | (0.22) | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 25.00 | 73.68 | |||
| JCTC | 3.41 | (0.50) | 0.00 | (0.18) | 0.00 | 7.80 | 22.43 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare Inno Holdings Common and related stocks such as Gulf Resources Common, ZK International, and Origin Agritech Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GURE | (2.2 M) | 31 M | 15 M | 21 M | 17.9 M | 34.1 M | 36.2 M | 2.6 M | (70 M) | (25.8 M) | (8.4 M) | (924.7 K) | 10.1 M | (61.8 M) | (58.9 M) | (53 M) | (50.4 M) |
| ZKIN | 5 M | 5 M | 5 M | 5 M | 5 M | 5.2 M | 5.9 M | 7 M | 8.1 M | (825.6 K) | (3.8 M) | (6.1 M) | (61.1 M) | (2.8 M) | (4 M) | (3.6 M) | (3.8 M) |
| SEED | 8.1 M | (1.4 M) | 7.5 M | (9.5 M) | (13.8 M) | (65.6 M) | (75.7 M) | (153.7 M) | (65.7 M) | (102.8 M) | (91.5 M) | (6.3 M) | 55.3 M | 20.7 M | (52.6 M) | (47.4 M) | (45 M) |
| FMSTW | (73.1 K) | (365 K) | (192 K) | (582 K) | (150 K) | (183 K) | (1.3 M) | (10.7 M) | (2.7 M) | (2.3 M) | (2.6 M) | (4.2 M) | 956.6 K | (4.5 M) | (3.6 M) | (3.3 M) | (3.4 M) |
| CAPS | 5.6 M | (3.9 M) | (3.9 M) | (3.9 M) | (4.2 M) | (2.8 M) | (663 K) | (1.8 M) | (380 K) | (2.1 M) | 10.5 M | 3.9 M | 2.3 M | (3.8 M) | (2.6 M) | (2.3 M) | (2.2 M) |
| ITP | (6.1 K) | 21.6 M | 14.7 M | 13 M | 11.7 M | 11.5 M | 7.3 M | 1.7 M | (10.5 M) | 2.2 M | (5.6 M) | 905.5 K | (16.6 M) | (9.9 M) | (9.8 M) | (8.9 M) | (8.4 M) |
| CNEY | (812 K) | (812 K) | (812 K) | (812 K) | (812 K) | (812 K) | (812 K) | 1.6 M | 1.7 M | 2.3 M | 1.3 M | 2.2 M | (5.6 M) | (14 M) | (11.1 M) | (10 M) | (9.5 M) |
| ENFY | 6.9 M | 42 M | 44.8 M | 25.5 M | 31.4 M | 24.7 M | 25.2 M | (6.9 M) | 11.6 M | (136.8 M) | (119.7 M) | (98.4 M) | (13.3 M) | (28.4 M) | (28.4 M) | (25.6 M) | (24.3 M) |
| JCTC | 931.1 K | 3.1 M | 3.1 M | 1.9 M | 1.8 M | 2.1 M | 2.7 M | 2.9 M | 2.1 M | 2.8 M | 3.5 M | 1.2 M | (20.6 K) | 721.8 K | (4.1 M) | (3.7 M) | (3.5 M) |
Inno Holdings Common and related stocks such as Gulf Resources Common, ZK International, and Origin Agritech Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Inno Holdings Common financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Inno Holdings Common operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Inno Holdings Competitive Analysis
The better you understand Inno Holdings competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Inno Holdings' competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Inno Holdings' competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Inno Holdings Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of Inno Holdings Competition
Inno Holdings' competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Inno Holdings Common in relation to its competition. Inno Holdings' competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Inno Holdings in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Inno Holdings' competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Inno Holdings Common, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your Inno Holdings position
In addition to having Inno Holdings in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Warren Buffett Holdings Thematic Idea Now
Warren Buffett Holdings
A long-term portfolio of publicly-traded stocks on US exchanges that are owned by Warren Buffett's holding company Berkshire Hathaway. The Warren Buffett Holdings theme has 45 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Warren Buffett Holdings Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Inno Holdings Correlation with its peers. You can also try the ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world.
Will Construction Materials sector continue expanding? Could Inno diversify its offerings? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Inno Holdings. Market participants price Inno higher when confident in its future expansion prospects. Accurate valuation requires analyzing both current fundamentals and future growth trajectories. Every Inno Holdings data point contributes insight, yet successful analysis hinges on identifying the most consequential variables.
Earnings Share (26.30) | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 6.431 | Return On Assets | Return On Equity |
The market value of Inno Holdings Common is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Inno that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Inno Holdings' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Inno Holdings' true underlying value. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. Because Inno Holdings' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Inno Holdings' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Inno Holdings' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Inno Holdings is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. Meanwhile, Inno Holdings' quoted price indicates the marketplace figure where supply meets demand through bilateral consent.