IRSA Inversiones Competitors
| IRS Stock | USD 13.94 -0.76 -5.17% |
IRSA Inversiones vs Mint Incorporation Correlation Summary
Excellent diversification
Across the chosen horizon, IRSA Inversiones and Mint Incorporation show a correlation of -0.02 and fall into the Excellent diversification bucket. Lower overlap tends to improve diversification, while higher overlap means both positions carry similar risk.
The mean reversion effect in IRSA Inversiones is stronger when the initial deviation was driven by sentiment rather than fundamentals. Such deviations have sometimes corrected when the initial catalyst fades, though timing remains uncertain. The degree to which IRSA Inversiones' exhibits mean reversion depends on how efficiently the market prices new information. Short-term deviations tend to persist and even widen before correcting, making allocation calibration important.
IRSA Inversiones Competition Correlation Matrix
Reviewing how IRSA Inversiones Y moves relative to competing stocks can show whether peer exposure is reducing portfolio risk or simply repeating the same market bet. A reading near +1 usually means prices have moved in tandem, a reading near -1 suggests opposite movement, and a reading near zero points to weaker historical dependence.
Please upgrade your account to get full access to Macroaxis premium features
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Return momentum in IRSA Inversiones Stock is more useful when tested against peer-relative fundamentals and risk. Reviewing IRSA Inversiones' risk-adjusted indicators gives a clearer view of whether returns are being earned efficiently. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUSK | 3.53 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.22 | 4.93 | 7.36 | 24.22 | |||
| MATH | 4.38 | -0.55 | 0.00 | -0.63 | 0.00 | 6.93 | 33.09 | |||
| ESP | 2.65 | 0.40 | 0.10 | 0.36 | 3.45 | 6.03 | 17.01 | |||
| NNBR | 4.16 | 1.02 | 0.24 | 0.65 | 3.52 | 13.73 | 35.56 | |||
| SNT | 1.90 | -0.53 | 0.00 | -0.85 | 0.00 | 3.64 | 18.49 | |||
| HURC | 1.45 | -0.06 | 0.00 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 2.86 | 9.67 | |||
| HQI | 2.36 | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 2.73 | 5.21 | 12.16 | |||
| OPXS | 2.84 | -0.46 | 0.00 | -0.30 | 0.00 | 5.64 | 26.05 | |||
| RITR | 5.29 | -0.57 | 0.00 | 2.48 | 0.00 | 10.14 | 70.41 | |||
| MIMI | 7.00 | 1.07 | 0.14 | 0.61 | 6.76 | 16.67 | 140.09 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is what remains after all costs — operating expenses, interest, taxes, and preferred dividends — are deducted from IRSA Inversiones's total revenue. The relationship between net income growth and revenue growth at IRSA Inversiones reveals whether margin expansion is driving earnings or whether top-line growth is being consumed by rising costs and financing charges.Compare IRSA Inversiones Y and related stocks such as Mammoth Energy Services, Metalpha Technology, and Espey Mfg Electronics Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESP | 1.7 M | 4.4 M | 5.6 M | 1.2 M | 3.2 M | 3.2 M | 1.1 M | 3.1 M | 2.3 M | 1.2 M | -181.5 K | 1.3 M | 3.7 M | 5.8 M | 8.1 M | 9.4 M | 9.8 M |
| NNBR | 4.9 M | 20.9 M | 24.3 M | 17.2 M | 8.2 M | -9.6 M | 8.3 M | 26 M | -264.5 M | -46.7 M | -100.6 M | -13.2 M | -26.1 M | -50.1 M | -38.3 M | -34 M | -32.3 M |
| HURC | -12.7 M | 15.6 M | 8.2 M | 15.1 M | 16.2 M | 13.3 M | 15.1 M | 21.5 M | 17.5 M | -6.2 M | 6.8 M | 8.2 M | 4.4 M | -16.6 M | -15.1 M | -17.4 M | -16.5 M |
| OPXS | -87.6 K | -367 K | 137 K | -2.1 M | 491 K | -236 K | -304 K | 1.4 M | 5.7 M | 1.8 M | 2.1 M | 1.3 M | 2.3 M | 3.8 M | 5.1 M | 5.9 M | 6.2 M |
IRSA Inversiones Competitive Analysis
Among Mammoth Energy, Espey Mfg, and NN and IRSA Inversiones, each company brings a distinct financial profile to the table. IRSA Inversiones contributes 490.53 B in revenue from a 1.14 B base. Shareholders see a 31.18% return on equity, supported by a 98.94% profit margin. IRSA Inversiones pulls in 490.53 B in revenue while Mammoth Energy reports 44.3 M. Valuation multiples differ: Espey Mfg at 37.01x P/E versus IRSA Inversiones at 1.41x, suggesting different growth expectations. IRSA Inversiones keeps more of each revenue dollar with a 98.94% margin versus -7.85% at NN.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
IRSA Inversiones Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze IRSA Inversiones Against Peers
IRSA Inversiones' peer analysis compares IRSA Inversiones with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether IRSA Inversiones trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where IRSA Inversiones leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
IRSA Inversiones' return on invested capital tops the peer average, meaning each dollar of capital is working harder here. Geographic revenue mix for IRSA Inversiones versus peers affects currency exposure and growth opportunity differently. Comparing operational quality across peers can be more informative than reading one company in isolation. For peer comparison, IRSA Inversiones has a market cap of 1.14 billion, P/E of 1.41, profit margin of 98.94%.
IRSA Inversiones Y values are built from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds, with reporting definitions aligned before display. Sell-side coverage, where present, supplements the data shown.
Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Michael Smolkin, Member of Macroaxis Board of Directors