Chicago Atlantic Competitors
| LIEN Stock | 9.01 -0.33 -3.53% |
Correlation: Chicago Atlantic vs GSR IV Snapshot
Very strong inverse diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between Chicago Atlantic and GSR IV stands at -0.59, or Very strong inverse diversification. In portfolio terms, the overlap shows how much shared movement remains after combining both positions.
Mean reversion is the tendency of Chicago Atlantic's price to return to its historical average after periods of extreme deviation. Some analysts monitor this tendency by comparing Chicago Atlantic's price extremes to fundamental value.
Chicago Atlantic Competition Correlation Matrix
Studying peer correlation around Chicago Atlantic BDC provides a cleaner read on how much independent price behavior still exists across the competitive set. When interpreted alongside fundamentals, correlation analysis separates broad industry exposure from company-specific behavior before additional capital is allocated across the peer group.
Please upgrade your account to get full access to Macroaxis premium features
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Headline performance for Chicago Atlantic Stock may not fully reflect how the business compares across its competitive set. Peer-relative risk metrics add context on drawdown behavior, consistency, and return quality. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPVG | 2.11 | 0.05 | 0.03 | -0.14 | 2.43 | 4.99 | 10.75 | |||
| SSSS | 2.74 | 0.60 | 0.24 | -1.79 | 2.40 | 6.63 | 16.18 | |||
| MPV | 1.06 | -0.14 | 0.00 | -1.39 | 0.00 | 1.92 | 10.16 | |||
| SWKH | 0.74 | -0.14 | 0.00 | -1.01 | 0.00 | 1.27 | 8.50 | |||
| MLCI | 3.21 | -0.88 | 0.00 | -1.84 | 0.00 | 6.25 | 20.11 | |||
| TONX | 5.31 | 1.19 | 0.24 | 17.38 | 4.32 | 15.38 | 25.64 | |||
| GIWWU | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| MFIN | 1.60 | -0.07 | 0.00 | -0.19 | 0.00 | 3.95 | 9.40 | |||
| NEWT | 1.82 | 0.09 | 0.05 | -0.40 | 2.45 | 3.99 | 9.35 | |||
| GSRF | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.19 | -0.98 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.30 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is what remains after all costs — operating expenses, interest, taxes, and preferred dividends — are deducted from Chicago Atlantic's total revenue. The relationship between net income growth and revenue growth at Chicago Atlantic reveals whether margin expansion is driving earnings or whether top-line growth is being consumed by rising costs and financing charges.Compare Chicago Atlantic BDC and related stocks such as Triplepoint Venture, SuRo Capital Corp, and Barings Participation Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSSS | -3.6 M | -3.6 M | -19.8 M | 35.4 M | -2.1 M | 8.5 M | -75 M | 17.6 M | 891.7 K | 24 M | 75.3 M | 147.1 M | -132.2 M | 5.1 M | -38.1 M | 48.8 M | 51.2 M |
| MPV | 20.3 M | 17.5 M | 17.5 M | 13.8 M | 16.5 M | 8.6 M | 11.6 M | 19.1 M | 3.6 M | 17.8 M | 6.3 M | 25.4 M | 7 M | 18.1 M | 17.2 M | 13.2 M | 14.3 M |
| SWKH | -12.6 M | -1.1 M | -1.4 M | 12.9 M | 20.8 M | -7.4 M | 28.9 M | 3 M | 6.2 M | 23.8 M | 5.2 M | 25.9 M | 13.5 M | 15.9 M | 13.5 M | -2.5 M | -2.7 M |
| TONX | -3.4 M | -3.4 M | -3.4 M | -4.6 M | -5.2 M | -7 M | -4.3 M | -7.3 M | -12.1 M | -15.9 M | -25 M | -34.5 M | -37.4 M | -22 M | -10.3 M | -148.5 M | -141.1 M |
| MFIN | 3.9 M | 19.2 M | 24.5 M | 25.8 M | 28.7 M | 29.4 M | 23.5 M | 278 K | -25 M | -1.8 M | -34.8 M | 54.1 M | 43.8 M | 55.1 M | 35.9 M | 43 M | 45.2 M |
| NEWT | 5.4 M | 3.3 M | 5.6 M | 7.5 M | 4 M | 35.7 M | 27.3 M | 39 M | 35.7 M | 41.1 M | 33.6 M | 84.1 M | 32.3 M | 47.3 M | 50.9 M | 60.5 M | 63.5 M |
| GSRF | -10.1 K | -10.1 K | -10.1 K | -10.1 K | -10.1 K | -10.1 K | -10.1 K | -10.1 K | -10.1 K | -10.1 K | -10.1 K | -10.1 K | -10.1 K | -10.1 K | -10.1 K | 1.3 M | 702.9 K |
Chicago Atlantic Competitive Analysis
To gauge Chicago Atlantic's financial strength, comparing it with Triplepoint Venture, SuRo Capital, and Barings Participation offers useful context. Chicago Atlantic is valued at 205.6 M and generates 54.3 M in revenue. A 11.01% return on equity and 61.29% net margin underscore Chicago Atlantic's earnings capacity. Triplepoint Venture leads on revenue, 97.2 M to 54.3 M. Net profitability gives SuRo Capital an edge at 10694.80% versus Chicago Atlantic at 61.29%. On equity returns, Chicago Atlantic earns 11.01% compared to 8.04% at Barings Participation.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Chicago Atlantic Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Chicago Atlantic Against Peers
Chicago Atlantic's peer analysis compares Chicago Atlantic with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Chicago Atlantic trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Chicago Atlantic leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Chicago Atlantic's return on invested capital tops the peer average, meaning each dollar of capital is working harder here. Price-to-book spreads across Chicago Atlantic's competitors highlight which firms the market values most for their asset base. Comparing micro-cap peers across Asset Management & Custody Banks, Financial Services separates structural strengths from temporary momentum. For peer comparison, Chicago Atlantic has a market cap of 205.61 million, profit margin of 61.29%.
Chicago Atlantic BDC metrics are compiled from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and normalized before display.
Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Rifka Kats, Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board