Rocky Competitors
| RMCF Stock | USD 2.31 0.14 5.71% |
Rocky Mountain vs Natural Alternatives Correlation
Poor diversification
The correlation between Rocky Mountain Chocolate and NAII is 0.72 (i.e., Poor diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Rocky Mountain Chocolate and NAII in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving against Rocky Stock
| 0.63 | AFO2 | ASSOC BR FOODS | PairCorr |
| 0.46 | 0M7 | COFCO Joycome Foods | PairCorr |
| 0.45 | FRM | Farm Pride Foods | PairCorr |
| 0.44 | LWAY | Lifeway Foods | PairCorr |
Sophisticated investors, who have witnessed many market ups and downs, anticipate that the market will even out over time. This tendency of Rocky Mountain's price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion. However, historically, high market prices usually discourage investors that believe in mean reversion to invest, while low prices are viewed as an opportunity to buy.
Rocky Mountain Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Rocky Mountain and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Rocky and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Rocky Mountain Chocolate does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Rocky Stock performing well and Rocky Mountain Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Rocky Mountain's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLAG | 6.39 | 0.93 | 0.09 | (1.87) | 8.80 | 17.28 | 65.84 | |||
| BON | 2.58 | (0.20) | 0.00 | (0.14) | 0.00 | 7.55 | 18.75 | |||
| MWYN | 3.18 | (0.29) | 0.00 | (0.11) | 0.00 | 7.50 | 29.68 | |||
| WVVI | 2.72 | (0.39) | 0.00 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 5.81 | 22.81 | |||
| MSS | 4.75 | (1.40) | 0.00 | (1.08) | 0.00 | 8.89 | 34.70 | |||
| HCWC | 4.54 | (1.03) | 0.00 | (0.38) | 0.00 | 11.11 | 56.39 | |||
| BEDU | 1.42 | 0.48 | 0.17 | 6.80 | 1.38 | 3.72 | 21.46 | |||
| PHH | 4.28 | (1.02) | 0.00 | (0.63) | 0.00 | 11.11 | 40.61 | |||
| PETZ | 1.91 | 0.19 | 0.07 | (5.33) | 1.96 | 4.04 | 12.06 | |||
| NAII | 3.13 | 0.69 | 0.17 | (3.19) | 3.01 | 9.16 | 28.68 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare Rocky Mountain Chocolate and related stocks such as Planet Green Holdings, Bon Natural Life, and Marwynn Holdings Common Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLAG | (11.2 K) | 19.9 M | 20.4 M | 16.6 M | 3.8 M | 12.2 M | (136 M) | (32.3 M) | 3.4 M | 2.9 M | (11.1 M) | (10 M) | (25.8 M) | (20.8 M) | (7.3 M) | (6.6 M) | (6.9 M) |
| BON | 223.4 K | 223.4 K | 223.4 K | 223.4 K | 223.4 K | 223.4 K | 223.4 K | 223.4 K | 2.6 M | 3 M | 4.6 M | 6.2 M | 4.6 M | 398.2 K | (2 M) | (1.8 M) | (1.7 M) |
| MWYN | 731.4 K | 731.4 K | 731.4 K | 731.4 K | 731.4 K | 731.4 K | 731.4 K | 731.4 K | 731.4 K | 731.4 K | 731.4 K | 731.4 K | 731.4 K | 998.1 K | (4.4 M) | (4 M) | (3.8 M) |
| WVVI | 100 K | 857.8 K | 1.2 M | 1.4 M | 2.2 M | 1.9 M | 2.6 M | 3 M | 2.9 M | 2.5 M | 3.4 M | 2.4 M | (646.5 K) | (1.2 M) | (117.9 K) | (135.6 K) | (128.8 K) |
| MSS | 904.1 K | 904.1 K | 904.1 K | 904.1 K | 904.1 K | 904.1 K | 904.1 K | 904.1 K | 904.1 K | 904.1 K | 904.1 K | (562.7 K) | 1.3 M | (3.3 M) | 1.2 M | 1.1 M | 1.1 M |
| HCWC | (1.7 M) | (1.7 M) | (1.7 M) | (1.7 M) | (1.7 M) | (1.7 M) | (1.7 M) | (1.7 M) | (1.7 M) | (1.7 M) | (1.7 M) | (1.8 M) | (3.3 M) | (9.9 M) | (4.5 M) | (4.1 M) | (4.3 M) |
| PETZ | 466.8 K | 466.8 K | 466.8 K | 466.8 K | 466.8 K | 466.8 K | 1 M | 115.1 K | (14.2 M) | (8.6 M) | (874.7 K) | (6.1 M) | 803.7 K | (23.6 M) | 2.7 M | 2.4 M | 2.5 M |
| NAII | 400 K | 4.2 M | 1.6 M | 2 M | 3.3 M | 9.5 M | 7.2 M | 5.1 M | 6.5 M | (1.6 M) | 10.8 M | 10.7 M | 2.5 M | (7.2 M) | (13.6 M) | (15.6 M) | (14.8 M) |
Rocky Mountain Chocolate and related stocks such as Planet Green Holdings, Bon Natural Life, and Marwynn Holdings Common Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Rocky Mountain Chocolate financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Rocky Mountain Chocolate operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Rocky Mountain Competitive Analysis
The better you understand Rocky Mountain competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Rocky Mountain's competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Rocky Mountain's competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Rocky Mountain Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of Rocky Mountain Competition
Rocky Mountain's competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Rocky Mountain Chocolate in relation to its competition. Rocky Mountain's competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Rocky Mountain in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Rocky Mountain's competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Rocky Mountain Chocolate, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your Rocky Mountain position
In addition to having Rocky Mountain in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Target Outcome ETFs Thematic Idea Now
Target Outcome ETFs
ETF themes focus on helping investors to gain exposure to a broad range of assets, diversify, and lower overall costs. The Target Outcome ETFs theme has 86 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Target Outcome ETFs Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Rocky Mountain Correlation with its peers. You can also try the Bond Analysis module to evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios..
Can Packaged Foods & Meats industry sustain growth momentum? Does Rocky have expansion opportunities? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Rocky Mountain. Anticipated expansion of Rocky directly elevates investor willingness to pay premium valuations. Determining accurate worth demands scrutiny of both present operating results and projected expansion capacity. Evaluating Rocky Mountain demands reviewing these metrics collectively while recognizing certain factors exert disproportionate influence.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.86) | Earnings Share (0.62) | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.069 | Return On Assets |
Understanding Rocky Mountain Chocolate requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects Rocky's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value—what Rocky Mountain's is actually worth based on fundamentals—guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Market participants employ diverse analytical approaches to determine fair value and identify buying opportunities when prices dip below calculated worth. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push Rocky Mountain's price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
It's important to distinguish between Rocky Mountain's intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding Rocky Mountain should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. In contrast, Rocky Mountain's trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.