Tenable Holdings Competitors
| TENB Stock | USD 21.83 0.29 1.35% |
Pair Correlation for Tenable Holdings and Pattern Group Details
Excellent diversification
Tenable Holdings currently posts a -0.04 correlation with Pattern Group, indicating a Excellent diversification relationship for the active sample. In portfolio terms, the overlap shows how much shared movement remains after combining both positions.
Experienced market participants anticipate that Tenable Holdings' price will even out over time. Periods when Tenable Holdings' deviates significantly from its historical mean may warrant further fundamental analysis. Mean reversion in Tenable Holdings' serves as a complement to momentum analysis.
Tenable Holdings Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for Tenable Holdings matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. This matrix is most informative when seeking to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
Please upgrade your account to get full access to Macroaxis premium features
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Strong recent returns in Tenable Holdings Stock do not always mean Tenable Holdings Company is outperforming peers on business quality. Reviewing Tenable Holdings' risk-adjusted indicators gives a clearer view of whether returns are being earned efficiently. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOCN | 4.76 | 1.66 | 0.33 | 1.83 | 4.44 | 9.53 | 35.02 | |||
| WRD | 2.92 | 0.06 | 0.02 | -0.07 | 3.04 | 7.47 | 18.39 | |||
| RELY | 2.42 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 11.64 | 2.15 | 4.34 | 34.48 | |||
| SPSC | 2.34 | -0.51 | 0.00 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 3.71 | 13.67 | |||
| VRNS | 2.78 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 0.66 | 4.33 | 6.34 | 24.09 | |||
| CLBT | 2.85 | 0.01 | 0.00 | -0.67 | 4.08 | 6.86 | 19.75 | |||
| GBTG | 2.93 | 0.86 | 0.26 | 39.15 | 2.64 | 4.47 | 58.03 | |||
| BL | 2.80 | -0.48 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 5.48 | 17.14 | |||
| VERX | 3.26 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 7.10 | 18.99 | |||
| PTRN | 3.65 | 0.47 | 0.10 | -0.65 | 4.23 | 9.67 | 20.24 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is what remains after all costs — operating expenses, interest, taxes, and preferred dividends — are deducted from Tenable Holdings's total revenue. The relationship between net income growth and revenue growth at Tenable Holdings reveals whether margin expansion is driving earnings or whether top-line growth is being consumed by rising costs and financing charges.Compare Tenable Holdings and related stocks such as DigitalOcean Holdings, WeRide American, and Remitly Global Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOCN | -36 M | -36 M | -36 M | -36 M | -36 M | -36 M | -36 M | -36 M | -36 M | -40.4 M | -43.6 M | -19.5 M | -27.8 M | 19.4 M | 84.5 M | 259.3 M | 272.2 M |
| WRD | -14.4 M | -14.4 M | -14.4 M | -14.4 M | -14.4 M | -30 M | -47.1 M | 49.9 M | -694.9 M | -694.9 M | -694.9 M | -1 B | -1.3 B | -1.9 B | -2.5 B | -1.6 B | -1.5 B |
| RELY | 102.2 M | -9.3 M | -4 M | -10 M | 3.1 M | -31.7 M | -103.2 M | -120.8 M | -51.4 M | -51.4 M | -32.6 M | -38.8 M | -114 M | -117.8 M | -37 M | 67.9 M | 52.7 M |
| SPSC | -2.2 M | 13.7 M | 1.2 M | 1.1 M | 2.7 M | 4.6 M | 5.7 M | -2.4 M | 23.9 M | 33.7 M | 45.6 M | 44.6 M | 55.1 M | 65.8 M | 77.1 M | 93.3 M | 98 M |
| VRNS | -2.8 M | -3.8 M | -4.8 M | -7.5 M | -19.4 M | -21.3 M | -17.7 M | -13.8 M | -28.6 M | -78.8 M | -94 M | -116.9 M | -124.5 M | -100.9 M | -95.8 M | -129.3 M | -122.9 M |
| CLBT | -1.9 M | -1.9 M | -1.9 M | -1.9 M | -1.9 M | -1.9 M | -1.9 M | -1.9 M | -1.9 M | -1.9 M | 5.8 M | 71.4 M | 120.8 M | -81.1 M | -283 M | 78.3 M | 82.2 M |
| GBTG | 19 M | 19 M | 19 M | 19 M | 19 M | 19 M | 19 M | 19 M | 19 M | 134 M | -614 M | -467 M | -25 M | -63 M | -138 M | 109 M | 114.5 M |
| BL | -16.7 M | -16.7 M | -16.7 M | -16.7 M | -16.8 M | -24.7 M | -39.2 M | -38.1 M | -27.8 M | -32.5 M | -46.9 M | -115.2 M | -29.4 M | 52.8 M | 161.2 M | 24.5 M | 25.7 M |
| PTRN | -3 M | -3 M | -3 M | -3 M | -3 M | -3 M | -3 M | -3 M | -3 M | -3 M | -3 M | -3 M | -3 M | 41.3 M | 67.9 M | 16.2 M | 15.4 M |
Tenable Holdings Competitive Analysis
Within its peer group that includes DigitalOcean Holdings, WeRide American, and Remitly Global, Tenable Holdings stands out in several ways. The company commands a 2.47 B market valuation built on 999.4 M in annual revenue. The -3.73% return on equity and -1.15% profit margin point to near-term profitability challenges for Tenable Holdings. DigitalOcean Holdings keeps more of each revenue dollar with a 24.97% margin versus -1.15% at Tenable Holdings. Return on equity favors Tenable Holdings at -3.73%, well ahead of WeRide American at -22.12%. On pure scale, Remitly Global is the bigger entity with market caps of 4.80 B versus 2.47 B.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Tenable Holdings Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Tenable Holdings Against Peers
Tenable Holdings' peer analysis compares Tenable Holdings with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Tenable Holdings trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Tenable Holdings leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Tenable Holdings carries less net debt relative to EBITDA than most competitors, giving it more room to invest or weather downturns. Peer comparisons can reduce single-name bias by forcing a wider operating and valuation context. For peer comparison, Tenable Holdings has a market cap of 2.47 billion, profit margin of -1.15%.
Tenable Holdings analytics rely on periodic company reporting and market reference feeds, with quality checks and normalization applied.
Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Raphi Shpitalnik, Junior Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board