USFD Competitors
| USFD Stock | USD 99.93 2.05 2.01% |
US Foods vs Fomento Economico Correlation
Very poor diversification
The correlation between US Foods Holding and FMX is 0.86 (i.e., Very poor diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding US Foods Holding and FMX in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving together with USFD Stock
Moving against USFD Stock
| 0.81 | 3GX | HF FOODS GRP | PairCorr |
| 0.76 | HITI | High Tide | PairCorr |
| 0.66 | MSS | Maison Solutions | PairCorr |
| 0.53 | DTCK | Davis Commodities | PairCorr |
| 0.47 | GO | Grocery Outlet Holding | PairCorr |
US Foods Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between US Foods and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of USFD and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of US Foods Holding does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between USFD Stock performing well and US Foods Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze US Foods' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFGC | 1.46 | 0.01 | (0.02) | 0.13 | 1.94 | 2.99 | 11.38 | |||
| MKC | 1.28 | 0.19 | 0.06 | (1.00) | 1.91 | 2.69 | 10.75 | |||
| SGI | 1.45 | (0.03) | (0.01) | 0.04 | 1.74 | 3.23 | 8.98 | |||
| KOF | 1.11 | 0.37 | 0.26 | 1.83 | 0.94 | 2.76 | 5.74 | |||
| TSN | 1.20 | 0.26 | 0.16 | 1.08 | 1.07 | 3.17 | 8.77 | |||
| BG | 1.26 | 0.37 | 0.28 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 3.20 | 8.12 | |||
| CELH | 2.22 | (0.01) | (0.01) | 0.05 | 2.76 | 5.33 | 12.02 | |||
| CLX | 1.12 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.73 | 1.16 | 2.44 | 7.64 | |||
| FMX | 1.05 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 2.78 | 7.81 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare US Foods Holding and related stocks such as Performance Food, McCormick Company, and Somnigroup International Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFGC | 11 M | 21 M | 8.4 M | 15.5 M | 56.5 M | 68.3 M | 96.3 M | 198.7 M | 166.8 M | (114.1 M) | 40.7 M | 112.5 M | 397.2 M | 435.9 M | 340.2 M | 391.2 M | 410.8 M |
| SGI | 8.5 M | (21.2 M) | (24.5 M) | (2.8 M) | (52.8 M) | (39.1 M) | (11.2 M) | 348.8 M | 348.8 M | 348.8 M | 348.8 M | 624.5 M | 455.7 M | 368.1 M | 384.3 M | 441.9 M | 464 M |
| KOF | 300.2 M | 10.6 B | 13.3 B | 11.5 B | 10.5 B | 10.2 B | 10.1 B | (12.8 B) | 13.9 B | 12.1 B | 10.3 B | 15.7 B | 19 B | 19.5 B | 23.7 B | 27.3 B | 28.7 B |
| TSN | 34.8 M | 583 M | 778 M | 864 M | 1.2 B | 1.8 B | 1.8 B | 3 B | 2 B | 2.1 B | 3 B | 3.2 B | (648 M) | 800 M | 474 M | 545.1 M | 683.3 M |
| BG | (5 M) | 942 M | 64 M | 306 M | 515 M | 791 M | 745 M | 160 M | 267 M | (1.3 B) | 1.1 B | 2.1 B | 1.6 B | 2.2 B | 1.1 B | 816 M | 750.6 M |
| CELH | (8 K) | (1.9 M) | (2.8 M) | (1.8 M) | (2 M) | (2.1 M) | (3.1 M) | (8.2 M) | (11.2 M) | 10 M | 8.5 M | 3.9 M | (187.3 M) | 226.8 M | 145.1 M | 166.8 M | 175.2 M |
| CLX | 95.6 M | 541 M | 572 M | 558 M | 580 M | 648 M | 701 M | 823 M | 820 M | 939 M | 710 M | 462 M | 149 M | 280 M | 810 M | 931.5 M | 476.5 M |
| FMX | 306 M | 16.9 B | 20.6 B | 16 B | 17.3 B | 19.2 B | 23.4 B | 43.3 B | 23.6 B | 20.8 B | (1.8 B) | 28.8 B | 23.3 B | 64 B | 25.7 B | 29.6 B | 16.2 B |
US Foods Holding and related stocks such as Performance Food, McCormick Company, and Somnigroup International Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in US Foods Holding financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of US Foods Holding operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.US Foods Competitive Analysis
The better you understand US Foods competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, US Foods' competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across US Foods' competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
US Foods Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of US Foods Competition
US Foods' competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by US Foods Holding in relation to its competition. US Foods' competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of US Foods in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact US Foods' competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to US Foods Holding, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your US Foods position
In addition to having US Foods in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Large Cap ETFs Thematic Idea Now
Large Cap ETFs
ETF themes focus on helping investors to gain exposure to a broad range of assets, diversify, and lower overall costs. The Large Cap ETFs theme has 896 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Large Cap ETFs Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out US Foods Correlation with its peers. You can also try the Premium Stories module to follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope.
Will Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail sector continue expanding? Could USFD diversify its offerings? Factors like these will boost the valuation of US Foods. If investors know USFD will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. Accurate valuation requires analyzing both current fundamentals and future growth trajectories. Every US Foods data point contributes insight, yet successful analysis hinges on identifying the most consequential variables.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 2.059 | Earnings Share 2.94 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.033 | Return On Assets |
Investors evaluate US Foods Holding using market value (trading price) and book value (balance sheet equity), each telling a different story. Calculating US Foods' intrinsic value - the estimated true worth - helps identify when the stock trades at a discount or premium to fair value. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. External factors like market trends, sector rotation, and investor psychology can cause US Foods' market price to deviate significantly from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between US Foods' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if US Foods is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. Conversely, US Foods' market price signifies the transaction level at which participants voluntarily complete trades.