SM Energy Company Leadership
| SM Stock | USD 24.03 0.63 2.69% |
SM Energy's insiders are aggressively buying. The current insiders' sentiment of investing in SM Energy Co suggests that most insides are extremely bullish. SM Energy employs about 663 people. The company is managed by 33 executives with a total tenure of roughly 235 years, averaging almost 7.0 years of service per executive, having 20.09 employees per reported executive.
| Javan Ottoson CEO CEO and President Director and Member of Executive Committee |
| Herbert Vogel CEO President, Chief Executive Officer, Director |
Insider Sentiment 100
Aggressively Buying
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
| 2025-05-06 | Herbert S Vogel | Acquired 1000 @ 21.32 | View | ||
| 2025-02-26 | Barton R Brookman Jr | Acquired 7000 @ 32.36 | View |
Monitoring SM Energy's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
SM Energy | Build AI portfolio with SM Energy Stock |
SM Energy's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with SM Energy's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that SM Energy will maintain a workforce of about 660 employees by March 2026.SM Energy Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset (ROA) of 0.0807 % which means that for every $100 of assets, it generated a profit of $0.0807. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows a return on total equity (ROE) of 0.1658 %, which means that it produced $0.1658 on every 100 dollars invested by current stockholders. SM Energy's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well SM Energy manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 19th of February 2026, Return On Equity is likely to grow to 0.22, while Return On Tangible Assets are likely to drop 0.06. At this time, SM Energy's Asset Turnover is very stable compared to the past year.As of the 19th of February 2026, Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to grow to about 930.1 M, while Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop about 75.3 M. SM Energy secures a total of 238.26 Million outstanding shares. 30% of SM Energy outstanding shares are owned by institutions. Institutional investors are typically referred to investors that purchase positions in a given stock to benefit from reduced commissions. Hence, institutional investors are subject to different rules and regulations than regular investors. Please look out for any change in current institutional holding as this could mean something significant has changed at the company or is about to change. Please note that no matter how many assets the company retains, if the real value of the company is less than the current market value, you may not be able to make money on it.
Shares in Circulation | First Issued 1990-03-31 | Previous Quarter 114.9 M | Current Value 115.2 M | Avarage Shares Outstanding 69.2 M | Quarterly Volatility 30.1 M |
SM Energy Workforce Comparison
SM Energy Co is rated fifth in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Energy industry is at this time estimated at about 8,900. SM Energy holds roughly 663 in number of employees claiming about 7% of equities under Energy industry.
The company has Net Profit Margin (PM) of 0.23 %, which suggests that even a small decline in it sales will erase profits and may result in a net loss, or a negative profit margin. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows Net Operating Margin (NOM) of 0.32 %, which signifies that for every $100 of sales, it has a net operating income of $0.32. SM Energy Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific SM Energy insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on SM Energy's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, SM Energy insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
| Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 14,698 | 82,008 |
| 2025-09-01 | 0.7556 | 34 | 45 | 442,120 | 192,828 |
| 2025-06-01 | 7.0 | 14 | 2 | 85,741 | 12,726 |
| 2024-12-01 | 1.5 | 6 | 4 | 3,101 | 7,500 |
| 2024-09-01 | 0.62 | 31 | 50 | 291,352 | 209,363 |
| 2024-06-01 | 4.0 | 16 | 4 | 37,799 | 87,000 |
| 2024-03-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 1,839 | 48,506 |
| 2023-12-01 | 8.0 | 8 | 1 | 2,231 | 1,000.00 |
| 2023-09-01 | 0.5814 | 25 | 43 | 341,703 | 371,816 |
| 2023-06-01 | 13.0 | 13 | 1 | 58,778 | 5,000 |
| 2023-03-01 | 6.0 | 6 | 1 | 19,698 | 0.00 |
| 2022-09-01 | 0.8382 | 57 | 68 | 932,788 | 597,673 |
| 2022-06-01 | 1.3333 | 8 | 6 | 29,755 | 92,271 |
| 2022-03-01 | 0.6 | 3 | 5 | 1,125 | 65,562 |
| 2021-12-01 | 0.44 | 11 | 25 | 143,286 | 292,920 |
| 2021-09-01 | 0.8667 | 39 | 45 | 545,681 | 179,386 |
| 2021-06-01 | 7.5 | 15 | 2 | 74,387 | 13,971 |
| 2020-09-01 | 0.6212 | 41 | 66 | 702,091 | 416,320 |
| 2019-09-01 | 0.7321 | 41 | 56 | 364,125 | 162,632 |
| 2018-12-01 | 2.3333 | 7 | 3 | 12,403 | 11,655 |
| 2018-09-01 | 0.6667 | 46 | 69 | 228,759 | 141,411 |
| 2018-06-01 | 21.0 | 21 | 1 | 81,448 | 4,500 |
| 2017-09-01 | 0.6825 | 43 | 63 | 249,195 | 86,966 |
| 2016-12-01 | 2.6667 | 8 | 3 | 1,678 | 8,000 |
| 2016-09-01 | 0.7053 | 67 | 95 | 131,469 | 59,180 |
| 2015-12-01 | 2.75 | 11 | 4 | 10,933 | 25,359 |
| 2015-09-01 | 0.7766 | 73 | 94 | 273,237 | 165,039 |
| 2014-12-01 | 4.6667 | 14 | 3 | 31,363 | 29,316 |
| 2014-09-01 | 0.7339 | 91 | 124 | 203,098 | 166,294 |
| 2014-06-01 | 12.5 | 25 | 2 | 35,621 | 2,784 |
| 2014-03-01 | 3.0 | 3 | 1 | 5,500 | 883.00 |
| 2013-12-01 | 0.4762 | 10 | 21 | 1,296 | 74,638 |
| 2013-09-01 | 0.7188 | 92 | 128 | 556,145 | 440,062 |
| 2012-12-01 | 0.8889 | 8 | 9 | 19,460 | 25,053 |
| 2012-09-01 | 0.7979 | 75 | 94 | 973,204 | 745,962 |
| 2012-06-01 | 4.1667 | 25 | 6 | 55,358 | 22,308 |
| 2012-03-01 | 0.3077 | 4 | 13 | 42,088 | 114,387 |
| 2011-12-01 | 1.25 | 10 | 8 | 14,184 | 47,368 |
| 2011-09-01 | 0.9848 | 65 | 66 | 201,158 | 143,244 |
| 2011-03-01 | 0.7297 | 27 | 37 | 75,761 | 115,794 |
| 2010-12-01 | 0.8636 | 19 | 22 | 26,940 | 36,562 |
| 2010-09-01 | 0.9545 | 21 | 22 | 53,269 | 24,962 |
| 2010-06-01 | 15.0 | 15 | 1 | 52,050 | 15,644 |
| 2010-03-01 | 0.6364 | 21 | 33 | 11,250 | 11,929 |
| 2009-12-01 | 0.85 | 17 | 20 | 25,478 | 25,853 |
| 2009-09-01 | 11.0 | 11 | 1 | 67,075 | 1,000.00 |
| 2009-06-01 | 14.0 | 14 | 1 | 42,013 | 1,700 |
| 2009-03-01 | 1.1053 | 42 | 38 | 39,397 | 17,331 |
| 2008-12-01 | 1.4 | 21 | 15 | 21,878 | 20,825 |
| 2008-09-01 | 0.0811 | 3 | 37 | 20,125 | 81,102 |
| 2008-06-01 | 1.0571 | 37 | 35 | 157,876 | 226,016 |
| 2008-03-01 | 0.6667 | 44 | 66 | 83,281 | 72,215 |
| 2007-12-01 | 4.5 | 9 | 2 | 2,051 | 29,309 |
| 2007-09-01 | 1.4167 | 17 | 12 | 68,505 | 34,883 |
| 2007-06-01 | 1.4286 | 10 | 7 | 77,536 | 99,102 |
| 2007-03-01 | 0.2647 | 9 | 34 | 11,971 | 194,573 |
| 2006-12-01 | 1.6667 | 10 | 6 | 10,624 | 10,621 |
| 2006-09-01 | 0.5 | 2 | 4 | 6,248 | 12,496 |
| 2006-06-01 | 3.5 | 14 | 4 | 56,975 | 14,600 |
| 2006-03-01 | 1.375 | 22 | 16 | 151,431 | 73,480 |
| 2005-12-01 | 0.1386 | 14 | 101 | 101,404 | 368,454 |
| 2005-09-01 | 0.5385 | 7 | 13 | 32,704 | 143,015 |
| 2005-06-01 | 1.5 | 12 | 8 | 185,377 | 85,880 |
| 2005-03-01 | 1.2222 | 11 | 9 | 25,543 | 27,356 |
| 2004-12-01 | 0.3846 | 10 | 26 | 33,587 | 19,248 |
| 2004-09-01 | 0.4286 | 3 | 7 | 7,245 | 14,891 |
| 2004-06-01 | 2.1111 | 19 | 9 | 78,603 | 13,365 |
| 2004-03-01 | 0.7083 | 17 | 24 | 59,657 | 3,438,086 |
| 2003-12-01 | 2.0 | 18 | 9 | 97,400 | 60,233 |
| 2003-09-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 37,500 | 4,086 |
| 2003-06-01 | 6.0 | 6 | 1 | 40,436 | 5,290 |
| 2003-03-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 500.00 | 15,290 |
SM Energy Notable Stakeholders
A SM Energy stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as SM Energy often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. SM Energy's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting SM Energy's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Javan Ottoson | CEO and President Director and Member of Executive Committee | Profile | |
| Herbert Vogel | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
| William Sullivan | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
| Kenneth Knott | Senior Vice President—Business Development and Land and Assistant Secretary | Profile | |
| Lehman Newton | Senior Vice President - Regional Manager | Profile | |
| Patrick Lytle | Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer, Controller | Profile | |
| David Whitcomb | Vice President - Marketing | Profile | |
| Mary Lutey | Senior Vice President — Development and Environmental, Health and Safety | Profile | |
| David Copeland | Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Corporate Secretary | Profile | |
| A Pursell | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| Wade Pursell | CFO and Executive VP | Profile | |
| Blake Mckenna | Executive COO | Profile | |
| Julio Quintana | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
| Jennifer Samuels | Sr. Director of Investor Relations | Profile | |
| Loren Leiker | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Rose Robeson | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Stephen Brand | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Carla Bailo | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Larry Bickle | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Ramiro Peru | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Alan Bennett | Controller VP | Profile | |
| Susie Piehl | Vice Resources | Profile | |
| Elizabeth McDonald | Executive Officer | Profile | |
| Dean Lutey | Senior Officer | Profile | |
| Jason Sands | Vice Resources | Profile | |
| James Lebeck | Executive Counsel | Profile | |
| Lehman III | VP Operations | Profile | |
| Julie Gray | Vice Marketing | Profile | |
| Candace Lyon | VP HR | Profile | |
| Anita Powers | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Richard Jenkins | Vice Operations | Profile | |
| Andrew Fiske | Deputy Secretary | Profile | |
| Andrew Urie | Vice Geoscience | Profile |
About SM Energy Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as SM Energy often depends on how effective the management is. SM Energy management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of SM Energy management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the SM Energy management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | 0.10 | 0.06 | |
| Return On Capital Employed | 0.16 | 0.11 | |
| Return On Assets | 0.10 | 0.06 | |
| Return On Equity | 0.21 | 0.22 |
SM Energy Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as SM Energy use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare SM Energy within its industry.SM Energy Manpower Efficiency
Return on SM Energy Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 4M | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 80.9M | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 1.2M | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 23.3M |
Check out World Market Map to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in SM Energy Co. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in state. You can also try the Idea Optimizer module to use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio .
Will Oil & Gas Exploration & Production sector continue expanding? Could SM Energy diversify its offerings? Factors like these will boost the valuation of SM Energy. If investors know SM Energy will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. Accurate valuation requires analyzing both current fundamentals and future growth trajectories. Every SM Energy data point contributes insight, yet successful analysis hinges on identifying the most consequential variables.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.35) | Dividend Share 0.8 | Earnings Share 6.33 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.267 |
SM Energy's market price often diverges from its book value, the accounting figure shown on SM Energy's balance sheet. Smart investors calculate SM Energy's intrinsic value - its true economic worth - which may differ significantly from both market price and book value. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. Since SM Energy's trading price responds to investor sentiment, macroeconomic conditions, and market psychology, it can swing far from fundamental value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between SM Energy's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if SM Energy is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, SM Energy's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.