Stephen Brand - SM Energy Independent Director
| SM Stock | USD 45.46 0.70 1.56% |
Director
Dr. Stephen R. Brand is Independent Director of the Company. Dr. Brand is currently Senior Executive Advisor of Welltec AS, a privately held Danish corporation that develops and provides well technology and related services for the oil and gas industry. Dr. Brand is also a director of GeoScale, a privately held firm that provides advanced technology solutions and services to the EP sector for solving subsurface problems in complex geologic formations. He is also on the Advisory Board of OmniEarth, which provides advanced analytics of earth imaging and offers a unique solutionasaservice platform to assess and manage data that can be used in a predictive role. At the end of 2010, Dr. Brand retired as Senior Vice President, Technology of ConocoPhillips, a multinationalintegrated energy company. Prior to his appointment as Senior Vice President, Technology of ConocoPhillips in October 2007, Dr. Brand served as Vice President, Exploration and Business Development at ConocoPhillips, beginning in 2005. Dr. Brand started his career in 1976 as a geologist with Phillips Petroleum Company and thereafter served in various roles of increasing responsibility with Phillips Petroleum and its successor, ConocoPhillips, including serving as President, Canada and President, Australasia. since 2011.
| Age | 70 |
| Tenure | 13 years |
| Address | 1700 Lincoin Street, Denver, CO, United States, 80203 |
| Phone | 303 861 8140 |
| Web | https://sm-energy.com |
SM Energy Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset (ROA) of 0.0973 % which means that for every $100 of assets, it generated a profit of $0.0973. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows a return on total equity (ROE) of 0.2221 %, which means that it produced $0.2221 on every 100 dollars invested by current stockholders. SM Energy's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well SM Energy manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, SM Energy's Return On Tangible Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 21st of November 2024, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.13, while Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.12. At this time, SM Energy's Fixed Asset Turnover is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 21st of November 2024, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.13, while Net Tangible Assets are likely to drop about 2.3 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| William Byerley | Matador Resources | 66 | |
| Timothy Parker | Matador Resources | 45 | |
| Kenneth Stewart | Matador Resources | 66 | |
| Edward Djerejian | Magnolia Oil Gas | 82 | |
| Stephen Thorington | EQT Corporation | 64 | |
| Craig Burkert | Matador Resources | 63 | |
| Anita Powers | EQT Corporation | 65 | |
| Daniel Rice | EQT Corporation | 40 | |
| Frank Hu | EQT Corporation | 59 | |
| Steven Gray | Range Resources Corp | 61 | |
| Brenda Cline | Range Resources Corp | 60 | |
| Steffen Palko | Range Resources Corp | 69 | |
| Arcilia Acosta | Magnolia Oil Gas | 55 | |
| Philip Behrman | EQT Corporation | 69 | |
| Benjamin Hardesty | Antero Resources Corp | 70 | |
| Margaret Dorman | Range Resources Corp | 57 | |
| Reynald Baribault | Matador Resources | 56 | |
| Daniel IV | EQT Corporation | 44 | |
| Robert Clark | Antero Resources Corp | 75 | |
| Paul Korus | Antero Resources Corp | 62 | |
| Julia Rogers | Matador Resources | 60 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.22 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0973 |
SM Energy Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the SM Energy's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: SM Energy inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of SM Energy. The board's role is to monitor SM Energy's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. SM Energy's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, SM Energy's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Susie Piehl, Vice Resources | ||
| Elizabeth McDonald, Executive Officer | ||
| Kenneth Knott, Senior Vice President—Business Development and Land and Assistant Secretary | ||
| Lehman Newton, Senior Vice President - Regional Manager | ||
| Julio Quintana, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Javan Ottoson, CEO and President Director and Member of Executive Committee | ||
| Dean Lutey, VP Officer | ||
| William Sullivan, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Jennifer Samuels, Sr. Director of Investor Relations | ||
| Patrick Lytle, Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer, Controller | ||
| David Whitcomb, Vice President - Marketing | ||
| James Lebeck, Executive Counsel | ||
| Mary Lutey, Senior Vice President — Development and Environmental, Health and Safety | ||
| Loren Leiker, Independent Director | ||
| Lehman III, VP Operations | ||
| Herbert Vogel, President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| David Copeland, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Corporate Secretary | ||
| Julie Gray, Vice Marketing | ||
| Rose Robeson, Independent Director | ||
| Stephen Brand, Independent Director | ||
| Candace Lyon, VP HR | ||
| Anita Powers, Independent Director | ||
| Richard Jenkins, Vice Operations | ||
| Wade Pursell, CFO and Executive VP | ||
| Carla Bailo, Independent Director | ||
| Larry Bickle, Independent Director | ||
| A Pursell, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Andrew Fiske, Deputy Secretary | ||
| Ramiro Peru, Independent Director |
SM Energy Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is SM Energy a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.22 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0973 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.35 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.54 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 6.09 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 114.42 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 1.51 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 98.49 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 10.05 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 6.17 X |
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ArchitectCheck out World Market Map to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in SM Energy Co. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in population. You can also try the Funds Screener module to find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges.
Is Oil & Gas Exploration & Production space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of SM Energy. If investors know SM Energy will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about SM Energy listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.112 | Dividend Share 0.74 | Earnings Share 7.14 | Revenue Per Share 20.3 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.04) |
The market value of SM Energy is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of SM Energy that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of SM Energy's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is SM Energy's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because SM Energy's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect SM Energy's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between SM Energy's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if SM Energy is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, SM Energy's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.