Mercury Long Term Debt To Capitalization from 2010 to 2025

MRCY Stock  USD 43.35  0.19  0.44%   
Mercury Systems Long Term Debt To Capitalization yearly trend continues to be fairly stable with very little volatility. Long Term Debt To Capitalization will likely drop to 0.16 in 2025. During the period from 2010 to 2025, Mercury Systems Long Term Debt To Capitalization regression line of annual values had r-squared of  0.01 and arithmetic mean of  0.23. View All Fundamentals
 
Long Term Debt To Capitalization  
First Reported
2010-12-31
Previous Quarter
0.24612823
Current Value
0.16
Quarterly Volatility
0.02783835
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid
Check Mercury Systems financial statements over time to gain insight into future company performance. You can evaluate financial statements to find patterns among Mercury Systems' main balance sheet or income statement drivers, such as Depreciation And Amortization of 106.3 M, Interest Expense of 42.3 M or Selling General Administrative of 201.4 M, as well as many indicators such as Price To Sales Ratio of 2.15, Dividend Yield of 0.0 or PTB Ratio of 1.19. Mercury financial statements analysis is a perfect complement when working with Mercury Systems Valuation or Volatility modules.
  
Check out the analysis of Mercury Systems Correlation against competitors.
For more information on how to buy Mercury Stock please use our How to Invest in Mercury Systems guide.

Latest Mercury Systems' Long Term Debt To Capitalization Growth Pattern

Below is the plot of the Long Term Debt To Capitalization of Mercury Systems over the last few years. It is Mercury Systems' Long Term Debt To Capitalization historical data analysis aims to capture in quantitative terms the overall pattern of either growth or decline in Mercury Systems' overall financial position and show how it may be relating to other accounts over time.
Long Term Debt To Capitalization10 Years Trend
Pretty Stable
   Long Term Debt To Capitalization   
0.290.250.16100%
       Timeline  

Mercury Long Term Debt To Capitalization Regression Statistics

Arithmetic Mean0.23
Geometric Mean0.23
Coefficient Of Variation12.03
Mean Deviation0.02
Median0.23
Standard Deviation0.03
Sample Variance0.0008
Range0.1265
R-Value0.11
Mean Square Error0.0008
R-Squared0.01
Significance0.69
Slope0.0006
Total Sum of Squares0.01

Mercury Long Term Debt To Capitalization History

2025 0.16
2024 0.25
2022 0.29

About Mercury Systems Financial Statements

Mercury Systems investors use historical fundamental indicators, such as Mercury Systems' Long Term Debt To Capitalization, to determine how well the company is positioned to perform in the future. Understanding over-time patterns can help investors decide on long-term investments in Mercury Systems. Please read more on our technical analysis and fundamental analysis pages.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Long Term Debt To Capitalization 0.25  0.16 

Also Currently Popular

Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.

Additional Tools for Mercury Stock Analysis

When running Mercury Systems' price analysis, check to measure Mercury Systems' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Mercury Systems is operating at the current time. Most of Mercury Systems' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Mercury Systems' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Mercury Systems' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Mercury Systems to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.