George Stoeckert - Brinks Independent Director
| BCO Stock | USD 95.87 2.24 2.39% |
Director
Mr. George I. Stoeckert is Independent Director of the Brink Company. Mr. Stoeckert was a private investor and advisor since 2011. He served as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of The Brinks Company from May 2016 to June 2016, and previously served as President of North America and Internet Solutions at Dun Bradstreet from 2009 to 2011. Prior to that, he held various senior leadership positions at Automatic Data Processing, Inc., including President of Employer Services International and President of the Major Accounts Services Division. Before joining ADP, Mr. Stoeckert served as President of the Insurance Management Services Division at Ryder System, Inc. Mr. Stoeckert currently serves on the Board of Directors of Theragenics, Inc. and as an advisor to Bridge Growth Partners LLC . During the past five years, Mr. Stoeckert has also served as a director of Onvia, Inc., and Capital Re Corporation since 2016.
| Age | 71 |
| Tenure | 9 years |
| Phone | 804 289 9600 |
| Web | https://brinksglobal.com |
Brinks Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0493 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0493 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.2586 %, implying that it generated $0.2586 on every 100 dollars invested. Brinks' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Brinks manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| James Forese | Mistras Group | 86 | |
| Luca Savi | MSA Safety | 55 | |
| Rebecca Roberts | MSA Safety | 68 | |
| Thomas Barry | CompX International | 75 | |
| Jobi Coyle | Allegion PLC | N/A | |
| Dean Schaffer | Allegion PLC | 68 | |
| Sandra Rogers | MSA Safety | 55 | |
| Gregory Jordan | MSA Safety | 61 | |
| Charles Pizzi | Mistras Group | 70 | |
| Kevin Sawyer | Allegion PLC | N/A | |
| Diane Pearse | MSA Safety | 63 | |
| Nicholas DeBenedictis | Mistras Group | 75 | |
| Manuel Stamatakis | Mistras Group | 76 | |
| Meredith Mendes | NL Industries | 62 | |
| Nicole Haughey | Allegion PLC | 49 | |
| Michelle Lohmeier | Mistras Group | 58 | |
| Kareem Yusuf | Resideo Technologies | 48 | |
| Martin Welch | Allegion PLC | 71 | |
| Robert Bruggeworth | MSA Safety | 59 | |
| Charles Szews | Allegion PLC | 64 | |
| William Sperry | MSA Safety | 59 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.26 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0493 |
Brinks Company Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Brinks' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Brinks inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Brinks. The board's role is to monitor Brinks' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Brinks' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Brinks' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Laurent Borne, Executive Officer | ||
| Michael Sweeney, Vice President Controller | ||
| George Neill, Chief Marketing Officer | ||
| Richard Eubanks, President CEO | ||
| Ronald Domanico, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Rohan Pal, Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer and Chief Digital Officer | ||
| Kurt McMaken, Executive CFO | ||
| George Stoeckert, Independent Director | ||
| Douglas Pertz, President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| Michael Herling, Non-Executive Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Elizabeth Galloway, Executive Officer | ||
| David Dove, Executive Services | ||
| Ian Clough, Independent Director | ||
| Susan Docherty, Independent Director | ||
| Kathie Andrade, Independent Director | ||
| Simon Davis, Chief Human Resource Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Mark Eubanks, Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Reginald Hedgebeth, Independent Director | ||
| James Parks, Executive Vice President, President of Europe | ||
| Lindsay Blackwood, Executive Vice President General Counsel, Company Secretary | ||
| Michael Beech, Executive Vice President, President, Brazil, Mexico and Security | ||
| Timothy Tynan, Independent Director | ||
| Dana Brien, Senior Vice President General Counsel, Assistant Secretary | ||
| Dominik Bossart, Executive Vice President and President MEA, Asia and Brink's Global | ||
| A Parker, Independent Director | ||
| Dana OBrien, Senior Vice President General Counsel, Assistant Secretary | ||
| Lindsay JD, General VP | ||
| Paul Boynton, Independent Director | ||
| Jesse Jenkins, Head Relations | ||
| Daniel Castillo, Executive Operations | ||
| Raphael Shemanski, Senior Vice President - U.S. and Canada |
Brinks Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Brinks a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.26 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0493 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.02 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.09 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 7.04 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 43.64 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.45 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 99.55 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 792.02 K | ||||
| Price To Earning | 17.01 X |
Pair Trading with Brinks
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Brinks position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Brinks will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Brinks Stock
| 0.61 | AZ | A2Z Smart Technologies Tech Boost | PairCorr |
| 0.55 | BE | Bloom Energy Corp | PairCorr |
| 0.49 | BA | Boeing | PairCorr |
| 0.47 | B | Barnes Group | PairCorr |
| 0.37 | DIST | Distoken Acquisition | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Brinks could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Brinks when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Brinks - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Brinks Company to buy it.
The correlation of Brinks is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Brinks moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Brinks Company moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Brinks can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Brinks Company. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in main economic indicators. You can also try the Stocks Directory module to find actively traded stocks across global markets.
Is Commercial Services & Supplies space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Brinks. If investors know Brinks will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Brinks listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
The market value of Brinks Company is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Brinks that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Brinks' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Brinks' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Brinks' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Brinks' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Brinks' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Brinks is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Brinks' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.