David Esq - Global Payments Chief Officer
| GPN Stock | USD 118.58 1.50 1.28% |
Executive
David Esq is Chief Officer of Global Payments
| Age | 57 |
| Address | 3550 Lenox Road, Atlanta, GA, United States, 30326 |
| Phone | 770 829 8000 |
| Web | https://www.globalpayments.com/en-ap |
Global Payments Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0316 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0316 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.0606 %, implying that it generated $0.0606 on every 100 dollars invested. Global Payments' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Global Payments manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 25th of November 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to 0.07. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to 0.04. At this time, Global Payments' Intangible Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 25th of November 2024, Fixed Asset Turnover is likely to grow to 7.85, though Net Tangible Assets are likely to grow to (9.1 B).Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | EXECUTIVE Age | ||
| Andy McMonigle | CarMax Inc | N/A | |
| Santiago Zamit | Copart Inc | N/A | |
| Theresa Golinvaux | Maximus | 49 | |
| Paul Jantsch | Cintas | N/A | |
| Deborah Homewood | Maximus | N/A | |
| Christi Reiter | Cass Information Systems | N/A | |
| Bob Batz | CBIZ Inc | N/A | |
| Kimberly Dees | AutoNation | 45 | |
| Susie Choi | ABM Industries Incorporated | N/A | |
| Scott Putnam | Performant Financial | N/A | |
| Melissa Christ | Performant Financial | N/A | |
| Jon Bozzuto | Performant Financial | N/A | |
| Michael Gleespen | CBIZ Inc | 65 | |
| Raul Valentin | ABM Industries Incorporated | 61 | |
| Eileen Rivera | Maximus | N/A | |
| ChunWai Liang | Lithia Motors | 68 | |
| Linda Walker | Thomson Reuters Corp | N/A | |
| David CPA | First Advantage Corp | 66 | |
| Charles Lietz | Lithia Motors | N/A | |
| Chris Stoczko | BrightView Holdings | N/A | |
| Paul Kirkpatrick | Copart Inc | 53 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.0606 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0316 |
Global Payments Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Global Payments' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Global Payments inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Global. The board's role is to monitor Global Payments' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Global Payments' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Global Payments' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Kriss Cloninger, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Shannon Johnston, Senior Officer | ||
| Connie McDaniel, Independent Director | ||
| David Esq, Chief Officer | ||
| Joshua Whipple, Chief Officer | ||
| John Bruno, Independent Director | ||
| Robert Baldwin, Independent Director | ||
| Jeffrey Sloan, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| Phyllis McNeill, Vice Communications | ||
| Frank Young, Senior Vice President - Global Product and Innovation | ||
| John Turner, Independent Director | ||
| Dara SteeleBelkin, Executive Counsel | ||
| Robert Cortopassi, President COO | ||
| Gaylon Jowers, President Solutions | ||
| Winnie Smith, Senior Relations | ||
| William Plummer, Independent Director | ||
| Andra Carter, Senior Officer | ||
| Ruth Marshall, Independent Director | ||
| Cameron Bready, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Executive Vice President | ||
| David Rumph, Executive Officer | ||
| M Woods, Chairman of the Board | ||
| David Sheffield, Chief Accounting Officer and Sr. VP | ||
| Winnie CFA, Senior Relations | ||
| Paul Todd, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||
| Heather Ross, Executive officer | ||
| Jeffrey JD, CEO Director | ||
| David Green, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary | ||
| Cameron CPA, CEO President | ||
| William Jacobs, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Ryan Loy, Chief Officer | ||
| F Arroyo, Independent Director | ||
| Joia Johnson, Independent Director | ||
| Guido Sacchi, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer |
Global Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Global Payments a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.0606 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0316 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.14 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.27 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 44.41 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 254.5 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.85 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 95.56 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 6.29 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 434.19 X |
Pair Trading with Global Payments
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Global Payments position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Global Payments will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Global Stock
Moving against Global Stock
| 0.43 | GPAK | Gamer Pakistan Common | PairCorr |
| 0.42 | BW | Babcock Wilcox Enter | PairCorr |
| 0.37 | FA | First Advantage Corp | PairCorr |
| 0.33 | EH | Ehang Holdings | PairCorr |
| 0.31 | DY | Dycom Industries | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Global Payments could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Global Payments when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Global Payments - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Global Payments to buy it.
The correlation of Global Payments is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Global Payments moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Global Payments moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Global Payments can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Global Payments. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in american community survey. To learn how to invest in Global Stock, please use our How to Invest in Global Payments guide.You can also try the Equity Analysis module to research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities.
Is Transaction & Payment Processing Services space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Global Payments. If investors know Global will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Global Payments listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.11) | Dividend Share 1 | Earnings Share 5.3 | Revenue Per Share 39.009 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.051 |
The market value of Global Payments is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Global that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Global Payments' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Global Payments' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Global Payments' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Global Payments' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Global Payments' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Global Payments is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Global Payments' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.