Shumeet Banerji - HP Independent Director
| HPQ Stock | USD 38.13 0.22 0.58% |
Director
Dr. Shumeet Banerji, Ph.D is Independent Director of the Company. He brings to the Board a robust understanding of the issues facing companies and governments in both mature and emerging markets around the world through his two decades of work with Booz Company. In particular, Mr. Banerji has valuable experience in addressing a variety of complex issues ranging from corporate strategy, organizational structure, governance, transformational change, operational performance improvement, and merger integration. Current Role Cofounder and Partner of Condorcet, LP, an advisory and investment firm that specializes in developing early stage companies Current Public Company Boards. HP. Reliance Industries Limited Prior Public Company Boards. Innocoll AG. Qualifications Prior Business and Other Experience. Senior Partner, Booz Company, a consulting company . Chief Executive Officer, Booz Company . President of the Worldwide Commercial Business, Booz Allen Hamilton . Managing Director, Europe, Booz Allen Hamilton . Managing Director, United Kingdom, Booz Allen Hamilton . Faculty, University of Chicago Graduate School of Business. since 2011.
| Age | 61 |
| Tenure | 13 years |
| Professional Marks | Ph.D |
| Address | 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA, United States, 94304 |
| Phone | (650)-857-1501 |
| Web | https://www.hp.com |
HP Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0705 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0705 of profit. This is way below average. HP's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well HP manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 11/25/2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to 0.07. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to 0.18. At this time, HP's Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/25/2024, Non Current Liabilities Other is likely to grow to about 6.9 B, while Total Current Liabilities is likely to drop slightly above 25 B.Similar Executives
| Found 13 records | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Jeffrey Rothschild | Pure Storage | 65 | |
| Susan Taylor | Pure Storage | 52 | |
| David Dorman | Dell Technologies | 66 | |
| William Green | Dell Technologies | 66 | |
| Lynn Vojvodich | Dell Technologies | 52 | |
| Ellen Kullman | Dell Technologies | 64 | |
| Mark Garrett | Pure Storage | 62 | |
| Anita Sands | Pure Storage | 43 | |
| Egon Durban | Dell Technologies | 47 | |
| Chad Rigetti | Rigetti Computing | 45 | |
| Simon Patterson | Dell Technologies | 47 | |
| John Colgrove | Pure Storage | 61 | |
| Roxanne Taylor | Pure Storage | 64 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Asset | 0.0705 |
HP Inc Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the HP's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: HP inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of HP. The board's role is to monitor HP's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. HP's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, HP's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Kim Rucker, Independent Director | ||
| Julie Jacobs, Chief Counsel | ||
| Steve Fieler, Chief Financial Officer | ||
| Ruairidh Ross, Global Secretary | ||
| Stacey Mobley, Independent Director | ||
| Didier Deltort, President of Personalization & 3D Printing | ||
| Stacy BrownPhilpot, Independent Director | ||
| Judith Miscik, Independent Director | ||
| Antonio Lucio, Chief Officer | ||
| Stella Low, Chief Officer | ||
| Robert Bennett, Independent Director | ||
| Marie Myers, Principal Accounting Officer, Head of Fin. Services and Global Controller | ||
| Sarabjit Baveja, Chief Strategy and Incubation Officer | ||
| Mary Citrino, Independent Director | ||
| Aida Alvarez, Independent Director | ||
| Tracy Keogh, Executive Vice President - Human Resources | ||
| Pretesh Dahya, Director Relations | ||
| Alexander Cho, President Systems | ||
| Stephanie Burns, Independent Director | ||
| David Rozzion, Managing Business | ||
| Shumeet Banerji, Independent Director | ||
| Tolga Kurtoglu, Chief Technology Officer, Global Head - HP Labs | ||
| Harvey Anderson, Chief Legal Officer, Company Secretary | ||
| Richard Clemmer, Independent Director | ||
| Kristen Ludgate, Chief People Officer | ||
| Bruce Broussard, Independent Director | ||
| Tuan Tran, President of Imaging, Printing and Solutions | ||
| Vikrant Batra, Chief Officer | ||
| Greg Baxter, Chief Transformation Officer | ||
| Elisabeth Moreno, Managing Africa | ||
| Rick Hansen, Deputy VP | ||
| Subra Suresh, Independent Director | ||
| Orit KeinanNahon, VP Relations | ||
| Barb Weiszhaar, Acting Global Controller | ||
| Judy Glazer, Global Compliance | ||
| Kim Rivera, President - Strategy and Business Management and Chief Legal Officer | ||
| Karen Parkhill, Chief Officer | ||
| Enrique Lores, President Printing, Solutions and Services business | ||
| Timothy Brown, Interim Officer | ||
| Christoph Schell, Chief Commercial Officer | ||
| Charles Bergh, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Alex Cho, President - Personal Systems Business | ||
| Chandrakant Patel, Chief Engineer | ||
| Yoky Matsuoka, Independent Director | ||
| Claire Bramley, Global Controller | ||
| Zac Nesper, Treasurer |
HP Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is HP a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Asset | 0.0705 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.05 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.07 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 44.76 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 963.41 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.20 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 82.40 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 44.66 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 9.89 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 0.69 X |
Pair Trading with HP
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if HP position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in HP will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with HP Stock
| 0.74 | ERIC | Telefonaktiebolaget Fiscal Year End 28th of January 2025 | PairCorr |
Moving against HP Stock
| 0.77 | NTIP | Network 1 Technologies | PairCorr |
| 0.42 | CDW | CDW Corp | PairCorr |
| 0.35 | SMCI | Super Micro Computer Trending | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to HP could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace HP when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back HP - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling HP Inc to buy it.
The correlation of HP is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as HP moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if HP Inc moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for HP can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for HP Stock Analysis
When running HP's price analysis, check to measure HP's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy HP is operating at the current time. Most of HP's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of HP's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move HP's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of HP to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.