Sandra Peterson - Microsoft Independent Director
| MSFT Stock | MXN 7,910 24.68 0.31% |
Director
Ms. Sandra E. Peterson is an Independent Director of Microsoft Corporationrationration. She has served as the Group Worldwide Chairman and member of the Executive Committee of Johnson Johnson, a diversified global health care company with leading consumer health, pharmaceutical and medical device businesses, since December 2012. Ms. Peterson previously served as Chairman of the Board of Management of Bayer CropScience AG from 2010 to 2012 and, prior to that, as a member of Bayer CropScience AGs Board of Management from July 2010 to September 2010. Prior to that, Ms. Peterson served as Executive Vice President and President, Medical Care, Bayer HealthCare LLC from 2009 to 2010, and as President, Diabetes Care Division, from 2005 to 2009. She was Group President of Government for Medco Health Solutions, Inc. from 2003 to 2004, Senior Vice President of Medcos health businesses from 2001 to 2003 and Senior Vice President of Marketing for MerckMedco Managed Care LLC from 1999 to 2001. Qualifications Ms. Petersons skills include extensive operating experience with global companies, product and marketing experience, and expertise with strategy development gained from her executive positions with Johnson Johnson, Bayer CropScience, Bayer HealthCare, and Medco Health Solutions. She has significant information technology experience, financial knowledge, and understanding of how to run a highly regulated business. Ms. Peterson has over a decade of public company board experience at Dun Bradstreet, including serving as Chair of the Innovation and Technology Committee and member of the Compensation and Benefits Committee. since 2015.
| Age | 60 |
| Tenure | 10 years |
| Phone | 425 882 8080 |
| Web | https://www.microsoft.com |
Microsoft Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1483 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1483 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.3931 %, meaning that it generated $0.3931 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Microsoft's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Microsoft manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Microsoft has accumulated 47.03 B in total debt with debt to equity ratio (D/E) of 0.47, which is about average as compared to similar companies. Microsoft has a current ratio of 1.74, which is within standard range for the sector. Debt can assist Microsoft until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Microsoft's shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Microsoft sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Microsoft to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Microsoft's use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.
Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Patricia Tracey | United States Steel | 67 | |
| Gail Wilensky | UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 75 | |
| Patricia Dennis | United States Steel | 72 | |
| John Noseworthy | UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 68 | |
| William Ballard | UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 77 | |
| Manuel Garza | Grupo Industrial Saltillo | 75 | |
| Luis Bonilla | Southern Copper | 58 | |
| John Engel | United States Steel | 57 | |
| Marcelo Segovia | Grupo Industrial Saltillo | 48 | |
| Jorge Garza | Grupo Industrial Saltillo | N/A | |
| Valerie Rice | UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 56 | |
| Alfredo Perez | Southern Copper | 65 | |
| Michele Hooper | UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 67 | |
| Enrique Mejorada | Southern Copper | 62 | |
| Eugene Sperling | United States Steel | 60 | |
| Gilberto Cifuentes | Southern Copper | 75 | |
| Michael McGarry | United States Steel | 61 | |
| Dan Dinges | United States Steel | 65 | |
| Stephen Girsky | United States Steel | 56 | |
| John Faraci | United States Steel | 69 | |
| Timothy Flynn | UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 62 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.39 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.15 |
Microsoft Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Microsoft's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Microsoft inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Microsoft. The board's role is to monitor Microsoft's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Microsoft's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Microsoft's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Bradford LCA, Pres Chairman | ||
| Charles Scharf, Independent Director | ||
| Emma Walmsley, Independent Director | ||
| Christopher Young, Executive Vice President - Business Development | ||
| JeanPhilippe Courtois, Executive Vice President and President - Microsoft Global Sales, Marketing and Operations | ||
| Penny Pritzker, Independent Director | ||
| Judson Althoff, Ex Officer | ||
| Sandra Peterson, Independent Director | ||
| Frank Shaw, Corp Communications | ||
| Teri ListStoll, Independent Director | ||
| Christopher Capossela, Executive Vice President, Marketing and Consumer Business, and Chief Marketing Officer | ||
| Margaret Johnson, Executive Vice President - Business Development | ||
| John Thompson, Independent Non-Executive Chairman of the Board | ||
| Amy Hood, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Padmasree Warrior, Independent Director | ||
| Bradford Smith, Executive Vice President General Counsel, Secretary | ||
| Brett Iversen, Gen Relations | ||
| Hugh Johnston, Independent Director | ||
| Arne Sorenson, Independent Director | ||
| Satya Nadella, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| Kevin Scott, Chief Technology Officer, Executive Vice President - Technology & Research | ||
| Keith Esq, Deputy VP | ||
| Frank Brod, Corporate Vice President - Finance & Administration, Chief Accounting Officer | ||
| Kathleen Hogan, Executive Vice President - Human Resources | ||
| Alice Jolla, Corporate Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer | ||
| John Stanton, Independent Director | ||
| Reid Hoffman, Independent Director |
Microsoft Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Microsoft a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.39 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.15 | |||
| Profit Margin | 0.33 % | |||
| Operating Margin | 0.41 % | |||
| Current Valuation | 36.56 T | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 7.44 B | |||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.06 % | |||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 73.54 % | |||
| Price To Earning | 31.71 X | |||
| Price To Book | 10.89 X |
Also Currently Popular
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.| ZLAB | Zai Lab | |
| ASLE | AerSale Corp | |
| ATS | AT S Austria |
Additional Tools for Microsoft Stock Analysis
When running Microsoft's price analysis, check to measure Microsoft's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Microsoft is operating at the current time. Most of Microsoft's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Microsoft's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Microsoft's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Microsoft to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.