Correlation Between Bridger Aerospace and Guardforce

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bridger Aerospace and Guardforce at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bridger Aerospace and Guardforce into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bridger Aerospace Group and Guardforce AI Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bridger Aerospace and Guardforce and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bridger Aerospace with a short position of Guardforce. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bridger Aerospace and Guardforce.

Diversification Opportunities for Bridger Aerospace and Guardforce

0.09
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bridger and Guardforce is 0.09. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bridger Aerospace Group and Guardforce AI Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Guardforce AI and Bridger Aerospace is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bridger Aerospace Group are associated (or correlated) with Guardforce. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Guardforce AI has no effect on the direction of Bridger Aerospace i.e., Bridger Aerospace and Guardforce go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bridger Aerospace and Guardforce

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Bridger Aerospace Group is expected to under-perform the Guardforce. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Bridger Aerospace Group is 30.6 times less risky than Guardforce. The stock trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Guardforce AI Co is currently generating about 0.2 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  24.00  in Guardforce AI Co on August 24, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (14.50) from holding Guardforce AI Co or give up 60.42% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy69.6%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bridger Aerospace Group  vs.  Guardforce AI Co

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bridger Aerospace 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bridger Aerospace Group are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, Bridger Aerospace reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Guardforce AI 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guardforce AI Co are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly abnormal forward indicators, Guardforce showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bridger Aerospace and Guardforce Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bridger Aerospace and Guardforce

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bridger Aerospace and Guardforce positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bridger Aerospace position performs unexpectedly, Guardforce can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Guardforce will offset losses from the drop in Guardforce's long position.
The idea behind Bridger Aerospace Group and Guardforce AI Co pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Anywhere module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities