Correlation Between Bloomsbury Publishing and Games Workshop

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bloomsbury Publishing and Games Workshop at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bloomsbury Publishing and Games Workshop into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bloomsbury Publishing Plc and Games Workshop Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bloomsbury Publishing and Games Workshop and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bloomsbury Publishing with a short position of Games Workshop. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bloomsbury Publishing and Games Workshop.

Diversification Opportunities for Bloomsbury Publishing and Games Workshop

-0.44
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bloomsbury and Games is -0.44. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bloomsbury Publishing Plc and Games Workshop Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Games Workshop Group and Bloomsbury Publishing is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bloomsbury Publishing Plc are associated (or correlated) with Games Workshop. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Games Workshop Group has no effect on the direction of Bloomsbury Publishing i.e., Bloomsbury Publishing and Games Workshop go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bloomsbury Publishing and Games Workshop

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Bloomsbury Publishing Plc is expected to under-perform the Games Workshop. In addition to that, Bloomsbury Publishing is 1.14 times more volatile than Games Workshop Group. It trades about -0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Games Workshop Group is currently generating about 0.26 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,308,632  in Games Workshop Group on November 7, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  148,368  from holding Games Workshop Group or generate 11.34% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bloomsbury Publishing Plc  vs.  Games Workshop Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Bloomsbury Publishing Plc has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Bloomsbury Publishing is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
Games Workshop Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Games Workshop Group are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Games Workshop exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Bloomsbury Publishing and Games Workshop Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bloomsbury Publishing and Games Workshop

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bloomsbury Publishing and Games Workshop positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bloomsbury Publishing position performs unexpectedly, Games Workshop can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Games Workshop will offset losses from the drop in Games Workshop's long position.
The idea behind Bloomsbury Publishing Plc and Games Workshop Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Instant Ratings module to determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.