Correlation Between Glacier Bancorp and Heartland Financial

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Glacier Bancorp and Heartland Financial at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Glacier Bancorp and Heartland Financial into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Glacier Bancorp and Heartland Financial USA, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Glacier Bancorp and Heartland Financial and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Glacier Bancorp with a short position of Heartland Financial. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Glacier Bancorp and Heartland Financial.

Diversification Opportunities for Glacier Bancorp and Heartland Financial

0.94
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Glacier and Heartland is 0.94. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Glacier Bancorp and Heartland Financial USA in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Heartland Financial USA and Glacier Bancorp is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Glacier Bancorp are associated (or correlated) with Heartland Financial. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Heartland Financial USA has no effect on the direction of Glacier Bancorp i.e., Glacier Bancorp and Heartland Financial go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Glacier Bancorp and Heartland Financial

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Glacier Bancorp is expected to generate 1.49 times less return on investment than Heartland Financial. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Glacier Bancorp is 1.24 times less risky than Heartland Financial. It trades about 0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Heartland Financial USA is currently generating about 0.25 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  5,783  in Heartland Financial USA on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,112  from holding Heartland Financial USA or generate 19.23% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Glacier Bancorp  vs.  Heartland Financial USA

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Glacier Bancorp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Glacier Bancorp are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly weak fundamental indicators, Glacier Bancorp demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Heartland Financial USA 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Heartland Financial USA are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly weak essential indicators, Heartland Financial reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Glacier Bancorp and Heartland Financial Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Glacier Bancorp and Heartland Financial

The main advantage of trading using opposite Glacier Bancorp and Heartland Financial positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Glacier Bancorp position performs unexpectedly, Heartland Financial can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Heartland Financial will offset losses from the drop in Heartland Financial's long position.
The idea behind Glacier Bancorp and Heartland Financial USA pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets