Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Regional Management

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Regional Management at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Regional Management into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Group and Regional Management Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Regional Management and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Regional Management. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Regional Management.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Regional Management

-0.44
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Regional is -0.44. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Group and Regional Management Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Regional Management Corp and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Group are associated (or correlated) with Regional Management. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Regional Management Corp has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Regional Management go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Regional Management

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Goldman Sachs Group is expected to generate 0.64 times more return on investment than Regional Management. However, Goldman Sachs Group is 1.57 times less risky than Regional Management. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Regional Management Corp is currently generating about 0.07 per unit of risk. If you would invest  38,444  in Goldman Sachs Group on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  21,834  from holding Goldman Sachs Group or generate 56.79% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Group  vs.  Regional Management Corp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Group are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Goldman Sachs unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Regional Management Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Regional Management Corp has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy primary indicators, Regional Management is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs and Regional Management Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Regional Management

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Regional Management positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Regional Management can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Regional Management will offset losses from the drop in Regional Management's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Group and Regional Management Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sync Your Broker module to sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors..

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities