Correlation Between Goosehead Insurance and REDFLEX HOLDINGS
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goosehead Insurance and REDFLEX HOLDINGS at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goosehead Insurance and REDFLEX HOLDINGS into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goosehead Insurance and REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goosehead Insurance and REDFLEX HOLDINGS and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goosehead Insurance with a short position of REDFLEX HOLDINGS. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goosehead Insurance and REDFLEX HOLDINGS.
Diversification Opportunities for Goosehead Insurance and REDFLEX HOLDINGS
-0.29 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Goosehead and REDFLEX is -0.29. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goosehead Insurance and REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD and Goosehead Insurance is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goosehead Insurance are associated (or correlated) with REDFLEX HOLDINGS. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD has no effect on the direction of Goosehead Insurance i.e., Goosehead Insurance and REDFLEX HOLDINGS go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Goosehead Insurance and REDFLEX HOLDINGS
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Goosehead Insurance is expected to generate 7.48 times less return on investment than REDFLEX HOLDINGS. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Goosehead Insurance is 8.68 times less risky than REDFLEX HOLDINGS. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 3.75 in REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD on October 24, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (0.32) from holding REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD or give up 8.53% of portfolio value over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Against |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Goosehead Insurance vs. REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Goosehead Insurance |
| REDFLEX HOLDINGS LTD |
Goosehead Insurance and REDFLEX HOLDINGS Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Goosehead Insurance and REDFLEX HOLDINGS
The main advantage of trading using opposite Goosehead Insurance and REDFLEX HOLDINGS positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goosehead Insurance position performs unexpectedly, REDFLEX HOLDINGS can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in REDFLEX HOLDINGS will offset losses from the drop in REDFLEX HOLDINGS's long position.| Goosehead Insurance vs. Enstar Group Limited | Goosehead Insurance vs. Waterdrop ADR | Goosehead Insurance vs. Axa Equitable Holdings | Goosehead Insurance vs. Hartford Financial Services |
| REDFLEX HOLDINGS vs. Kellanova | REDFLEX HOLDINGS vs. Gladstone Investment | REDFLEX HOLDINGS vs. Goosehead Insurance | REDFLEX HOLDINGS vs. Shenzhen Investment Holdings |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.
Other Complementary Tools
| Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
| Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
| Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume | |
| Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
| Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |