Correlation Between International Metals and First Majestic

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both International Metals and First Majestic at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining International Metals and First Majestic into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between International Metals Mining and First Majestic Silver, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on International Metals and First Majestic and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in International Metals with a short position of First Majestic. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of International Metals and First Majestic.

Diversification Opportunities for International Metals and First Majestic

0.69
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between International and First is 0.69. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding International Metals Mining and First Majestic Silver in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on First Majestic Silver and International Metals is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on International Metals Mining are associated (or correlated) with First Majestic. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of First Majestic Silver has no effect on the direction of International Metals i.e., International Metals and First Majestic go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between International Metals and First Majestic

Assuming the 90 days horizon International Metals Mining is expected to generate 3.23 times more return on investment than First Majestic. However, International Metals is 3.23 times more volatile than First Majestic Silver. It trades about 0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. First Majestic Silver is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  40.00  in International Metals Mining on October 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (32.50) from holding International Metals Mining or give up 81.25% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy99.8%
ValuesDaily Returns

International Metals Mining  vs.  First Majestic Silver

 Performance 
       Timeline  
International Metals 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days International Metals Mining has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain fairly stable which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The latest fuss may also be a sign of long-term up-swing for the venture sophisticated investors.
First Majestic Silver 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days First Majestic Silver has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, First Majestic is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

International Metals and First Majestic Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with International Metals and First Majestic

The main advantage of trading using opposite International Metals and First Majestic positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if International Metals position performs unexpectedly, First Majestic can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in First Majestic will offset losses from the drop in First Majestic's long position.
The idea behind International Metals Mining and First Majestic Silver pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Manager module to state of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital.

Other Complementary Tools

Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance