Correlation Between Litigation Capital and Norwegian Air

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Litigation Capital and Norwegian Air at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Litigation Capital and Norwegian Air into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Litigation Capital Management and Norwegian Air Shuttle, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Litigation Capital and Norwegian Air and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Litigation Capital with a short position of Norwegian Air. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Litigation Capital and Norwegian Air.

Diversification Opportunities for Litigation Capital and Norwegian Air

-0.31
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Litigation and Norwegian is -0.31. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Litigation Capital Management and Norwegian Air Shuttle in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Norwegian Air Shuttle and Litigation Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Litigation Capital Management are associated (or correlated) with Norwegian Air. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Norwegian Air Shuttle has no effect on the direction of Litigation Capital i.e., Litigation Capital and Norwegian Air go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Litigation Capital and Norwegian Air

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Litigation Capital Management is expected to generate 0.75 times more return on investment than Norwegian Air. However, Litigation Capital Management is 1.34 times less risky than Norwegian Air. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Norwegian Air Shuttle is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  10,073  in Litigation Capital Management on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,502  from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 14.91% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Litigation Capital Management  vs.  Norwegian Air Shuttle

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Norwegian Air Shuttle 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Norwegian Air Shuttle are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Norwegian Air is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Litigation Capital and Norwegian Air Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Litigation Capital and Norwegian Air

The main advantage of trading using opposite Litigation Capital and Norwegian Air positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Litigation Capital position performs unexpectedly, Norwegian Air can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Norwegian Air will offset losses from the drop in Norwegian Air's long position.
The idea behind Litigation Capital Management and Norwegian Air Shuttle pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings