Correlation Between Mfs Growth and Transamerica Emerging

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mfs Growth and Transamerica Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mfs Growth and Transamerica Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mfs Growth Allocation and Transamerica Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mfs Growth and Transamerica Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mfs Growth with a short position of Transamerica Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mfs Growth and Transamerica Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Mfs Growth and Transamerica Emerging

0.6
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Mfs and Transamerica is 0.6. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mfs Growth Allocation and Transamerica Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Transamerica Emerging and Mfs Growth is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mfs Growth Allocation are associated (or correlated) with Transamerica Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Transamerica Emerging has no effect on the direction of Mfs Growth i.e., Mfs Growth and Transamerica Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mfs Growth and Transamerica Emerging

Assuming the 90 days horizon Mfs Growth Allocation is expected to generate 0.67 times more return on investment than Transamerica Emerging. However, Mfs Growth Allocation is 1.48 times less risky than Transamerica Emerging. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Transamerica Emerging Markets is currently generating about -0.17 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,441  in Mfs Growth Allocation on August 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  37.00  from holding Mfs Growth Allocation or generate 1.52% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Mfs Growth Allocation  vs.  Transamerica Emerging Markets

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Mfs Growth Allocation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mfs Growth Allocation are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Mfs Growth is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Transamerica Emerging 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Transamerica Emerging Markets has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward-looking indicators, Transamerica Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Mfs Growth and Transamerica Emerging Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Mfs Growth and Transamerica Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mfs Growth and Transamerica Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mfs Growth position performs unexpectedly, Transamerica Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Transamerica Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Transamerica Emerging's long position.
The idea behind Mfs Growth Allocation and Transamerica Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Correlation Analysis module to reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated.

Other Complementary Tools

Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance