Correlation Between Microsoft and Income Growth

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Income Growth at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Income Growth into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Income Growth Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Income Growth and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Income Growth. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Income Growth.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Income Growth

0.12
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Income is 0.12. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Income Growth Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Income Growth and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Income Growth. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Income Growth has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Income Growth go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Income Growth

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 1.87 times more return on investment than Income Growth. However, Microsoft is 1.87 times more volatile than Income Growth Fund. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Income Growth Fund is currently generating about 0.07 per unit of risk. If you would invest  24,616  in Microsoft on August 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  17,084  from holding Microsoft or generate 69.4% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Income Growth Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Income Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Income Growth Fund are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Income Growth is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Microsoft and Income Growth Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Income Growth

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Income Growth positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Income Growth can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Income Growth will offset losses from the drop in Income Growth's long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and Income Growth Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.

Other Complementary Tools

Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets