Correlation Between Microsoft and Cult Food

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Cult Food at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Cult Food into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Cult Food Science, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Cult Food and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Cult Food. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Cult Food.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Cult Food

0.06
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Cult is 0.06. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Cult Food Science in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cult Food Science and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Cult Food. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cult Food Science has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Cult Food go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Cult Food

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 6.28 times less return on investment than Cult Food. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Microsoft is 8.25 times less risky than Cult Food. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Cult Food Science is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  4.53  in Cult Food Science on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (0.93) from holding Cult Food Science or give up 20.53% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Cult Food Science

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Cult Food Science 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Cult Food Science has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Microsoft and Cult Food Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Cult Food

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Cult Food positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Cult Food can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cult Food will offset losses from the drop in Cult Food's long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and Cult Food Science pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years