Correlation Between Microsoft and KINDER

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and KINDER at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and KINDER into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and KINDER and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of KINDER. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and KINDER.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and KINDER

0.45
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and KINDER is 0.45. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with KINDER. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and KINDER go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and KINDER

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 40.28 times less return on investment than KINDER. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Microsoft is 49.94 times less risky than KINDER. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  11,120  in KINDER MORGAN ENERGY on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (338.00) from holding KINDER MORGAN ENERGY or give up 3.04% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy78.79%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  KINDER MORGAN ENERGY

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, KINDER is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Microsoft and KINDER Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and KINDER

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and KINDER positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, KINDER can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in KINDER will offset losses from the drop in KINDER's long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Investing Opportunities module to build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon