Correlation Between Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Regional Management Corp and Manhattan Bridge Capital, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Regional Management with a short position of Manhattan Bridge. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge.

Diversification Opportunities for Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge

-0.38
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Regional and Manhattan is -0.38. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Regional Management Corp and Manhattan Bridge Capital in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Manhattan Bridge Capital and Regional Management is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Regional Management Corp are associated (or correlated) with Manhattan Bridge. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Manhattan Bridge Capital has no effect on the direction of Regional Management i.e., Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Regional Management Corp is expected to generate 3.42 times more return on investment than Manhattan Bridge. However, Regional Management is 3.42 times more volatile than Manhattan Bridge Capital. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Manhattan Bridge Capital is currently generating about -0.25 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,883  in Regional Management Corp on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  120.00  from holding Regional Management Corp or generate 4.16% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Regional Management Corp  vs.  Manhattan Bridge Capital

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Regional Management Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Regional Management Corp has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy primary indicators, Regional Management is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Manhattan Bridge Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Manhattan Bridge Capital are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Manhattan Bridge is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge

The main advantage of trading using opposite Regional Management and Manhattan Bridge positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Regional Management position performs unexpectedly, Manhattan Bridge can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Manhattan Bridge will offset losses from the drop in Manhattan Bridge's long position.
The idea behind Regional Management Corp and Manhattan Bridge Capital pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.

Other Complementary Tools

Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data