Correlation Between Constellation Brands and Fossil

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Constellation Brands and Fossil at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Constellation Brands and Fossil into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Constellation Brands Class and Fossil Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Constellation Brands and Fossil and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Constellation Brands with a short position of Fossil. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Constellation Brands and Fossil.

Diversification Opportunities for Constellation Brands and Fossil

-0.48
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Constellation and Fossil is -0.48. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Constellation Brands Class and Fossil Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fossil Group and Constellation Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Constellation Brands Class are associated (or correlated) with Fossil. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fossil Group has no effect on the direction of Constellation Brands i.e., Constellation Brands and Fossil go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Constellation Brands and Fossil

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Constellation Brands Class is expected to under-perform the Fossil. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Constellation Brands Class is 3.86 times less risky than Fossil. The stock trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Fossil Group is currently generating about 0.23 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  111.00  in Fossil Group on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  31.00  from holding Fossil Group or generate 27.93% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Constellation Brands Class  vs.  Fossil Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Constellation Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Over the last 90 days Constellation Brands Class has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Constellation Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Fossil Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fossil Group are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite abnormal basic indicators, Fossil disclosed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Constellation Brands and Fossil Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Constellation Brands and Fossil

The main advantage of trading using opposite Constellation Brands and Fossil positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Constellation Brands position performs unexpectedly, Fossil can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fossil will offset losses from the drop in Fossil's long position.
The idea behind Constellation Brands Class and Fossil Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance