Designer Brands Stock EBITDA
| DBI Stock | USD 5.04 0.15 3.07% |
Designer Brands fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Designer Brands' financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Designer Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Designer Brands' intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Designer Brands stock.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| EBITDA | 139.3 M | 143.7 M |
Designer | EBITDA |
Designer Brands Company EBITDA Analysis
Designer Brands' EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.
Current Designer Brands EBITDA | 139.33 M |
Most of Designer Brands' fundamental indicators, such as EBITDA, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Designer Brands is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
Designer EBITDA Driver Correlations
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Designer Brands is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Designer Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as EBITDA. Since Designer Brands' main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Designer Brands' historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Designer Brands' interrelated accounts and indicators.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
| Competition |
Designer Ebitda
Ebitda |
|
According to the company disclosure, Designer Brands reported earnings before interest,tax, depreciation and amortization of 139.33 M. This is 86.43% lower than that of the Specialty Retail sector and significantly higher than that of the Consumer Discretionary industry. The ebitda for all United States stocks is 96.43% higher than that of the company.
Designer EBITDA Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Designer Brands' direct or indirect competition against its EBITDA to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Designer Brands could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Designer Brands by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Designer Brands is currently under evaluation in ebitda category among its peers.
Designer Brands ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Designer Brands' sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Designer Brands' managers, analysts, and investors.Environmental | Governance | Social |
Designer Brands Institutional Holders
Institutional Holdings refers to the ownership stake in Designer Brands that is held by large financial organizations, pension funds or endowments. Institutions may purchase large blocks of Designer Brands' outstanding shares and can exert considerable influence upon its management. Institutional holders may also work to push the share price higher once they own the stock. Extensive social media coverage, TV shows, articles in high-profile magazines, and presentations at investor conferences help move the stock higher, increasing Designer Brands' value.| Shares | American Century Companies Inc | 2024-09-30 | 1.3 M | Bank Of America Corp | 2024-06-30 | 1.1 M | Amvescap Plc. | 2024-06-30 | 1.1 M | Jane Street Group Llc | 2024-06-30 | 1 M | Millennium Management Llc | 2024-06-30 | 1 M | Geode Capital Management, Llc | 2024-09-30 | 975.8 K | Two Sigma Investments Llc | 2024-09-30 | 971.2 K | Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc | 2024-09-30 | 755.4 K | Bank Of New York Mellon Corp | 2024-06-30 | 679 K | Blackrock Inc | 2024-06-30 | 6.9 M | Morgan Stanley - Brokerage Accounts | 2024-06-30 | 3.9 M |
Designer Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | -0.0108 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0067 | ||||
| Profit Margin | (0) % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.03 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 1.52 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 47.77 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 16.93 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 94.47 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 9.79 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 7.22 X | ||||
| Price To Book | 0.79 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 0.09 X | ||||
| Revenue | 3.07 B | ||||
| Gross Profit | 1.08 B | ||||
| EBITDA | 139.33 M | ||||
| Net Income | 29.06 M | ||||
| Cash And Equivalents | 58.77 M | ||||
| Cash Per Share | 0.79 X | ||||
| Total Debt | 1.24 B | ||||
| Debt To Equity | 3.23 % | ||||
| Current Ratio | 1.35 X | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | 6.41 X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 162.4 M | ||||
| Short Ratio | 6.40 X | ||||
| Earnings Per Share | (0.03) X | ||||
| Price To Earnings To Growth | 2.61 X | ||||
| Target Price | 5.75 | ||||
| Number Of Employees | 14 K | ||||
| Beta | 2.06 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 279.72 M | ||||
| Total Asset | 2.08 B | ||||
| Retained Earnings | 98.9 M | ||||
| Working Capital | 155.16 M | ||||
| Current Asset | 474.63 M | ||||
| Current Liabilities | 191.01 M | ||||
| Annual Yield | 0.04 % | ||||
| Five Year Return | 5.31 % | ||||
| Net Asset | 2.08 B | ||||
| Last Dividend Paid | 0.2 |
About Designer Brands Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Designer Brands's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Designer Brands using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Designer Brands based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis
When determining whether Designer Brands offers a strong return on investment in its stock, a comprehensive analysis is essential. The process typically begins with a thorough review of Designer Brands' financial statements, including income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, to assess its financial health. Key financial ratios are used to gauge profitability, efficiency, and growth potential of Designer Brands Stock. Outlined below are crucial reports that will aid in making a well-informed decision on Designer Brands Stock:Check out Designer Brands Piotroski F Score and Designer Brands Altman Z Score analysis. For more detail on how to invest in Designer Stock please use our How to Invest in Designer Brands guide.You can also try the Portfolio Optimization module to compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk.
Is Specialty Retail space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Designer Brands. If investors know Designer will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Designer Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.57) | Dividend Share 0.2 | Earnings Share (0.03) | Revenue Per Share 53.234 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.03) |
The market value of Designer Brands is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Designer that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Designer Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Designer Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Designer Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Designer Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Designer Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Designer Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Designer Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.