Dine Brands Global Net Income
| DIN Stock | USD 33.19 1.50 4.32% |
As of the 12th of February 2026, Dine Brands shows the Coefficient Of Variation of 444.16, downside deviation of 1.95, and Mean Deviation of 1.97. Dine Brands Global technical analysis allows you to utilize historical prices and volume patterns in order to determine a pattern that computes the direction of the firm's future prices.
Dine Brands Total Revenue |
|
Gross Profit | Profit Margin | Market Capitalization | Enterprise Value Revenue 2.2663 | Revenue |
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Net Income | 74.6 M | 78.4 M | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 56.7 M | 31.2 M | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 58.4 M | 33.4 M | |
| Net Income Per Share | 3.91 | 4.11 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.65 | 0.52 |
Dine | Net Income | Build AI portfolio with Dine Stock |
Evaluating Dine Brands's Net Income across multiple reporting periods reveals the company's ability to sustain growth and manage resources effectively. This longitudinal analysis highlights inflection points, cyclical patterns, and structural changes that short-term snapshots might miss, offering deeper insight into Dine Brands Global's fundamental strength.
Latest Dine Brands' Net Income Growth Pattern
Below is the plot of the Net Income of Dine Brands Global over the last few years. Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Dine Brands Global financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Dine Brands Global operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue. It is Dine Brands' Net Income historical data analysis aims to capture in quantitative terms the overall pattern of either growth or decline in Dine Brands' overall financial position and show how it may be relating to other accounts over time.
| View | Last Reported 64.89 M | 10 Years Trend |
|
Net Income |
| Timeline |
Dine Net Income Regression Statistics
| Arithmetic Mean | 44,256,246 | |
| Geometric Mean | 74,836,961 | |
| Coefficient Of Variation | 254.86 | |
| Mean Deviation | 68,731,292 | |
| Median | 78,354,675 | |
| Standard Deviation | 112,791,722 | |
| Sample Variance | 12722T | |
| Range | 470.4M | |
| R-Value | 0.06 | |
| Mean Square Error | 13522.2T | |
| R-Squared | 0 | |
| Significance | 0.82 | |
| Slope | 1,327,470 | |
| Total Sum of Squares | 203551.6T |
Dine Net Income History
Other Fundumenentals of Dine Brands Global
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | ||
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | ||
| Net Income Per Share | ||
| Net Income Per E B T |
Dine Brands Net Income component correlations
Dine Net Income Driver Correlations
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Dine Brands is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Dine Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Net Income. Since Dine Brands' main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Dine Brands' historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Dine Brands' interrelated accounts and indicators.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Will Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure sector continue expanding? Could Dine diversify its offerings? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Dine Brands. Projected growth potential of Dine fundamentally drives upward valuation adjustments. Accurate valuation requires analyzing both current fundamentals and future growth trajectories. Every Dine Brands data point contributes insight, yet successful analysis hinges on identifying the most consequential variables.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.61) | Dividend Share 2.04 | Earnings Share 2.24 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.108 |
Dine Brands Global's market price often diverges from its book value, the accounting figure shown on Dine's balance sheet. Smart investors calculate Dine Brands' intrinsic value - its true economic worth - which may differ significantly from both market price and book value. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. Since Dine Brands' trading price responds to investor sentiment, macroeconomic conditions, and market psychology, it can swing far from fundamental value.
It's important to distinguish between Dine Brands' intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding Dine Brands should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. However, Dine Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.
Dine Brands 'What if' Analysis
In the world of financial modeling, what-if analysis is part of sensitivity analysis performed to test how changes in assumptions impact individual outputs in a model. When applied to Dine Brands' stock what-if analysis refers to the analyzing how the change in your past investing horizon will affect the profitability against the current market value of Dine Brands.
| 11/14/2025 |
| 02/12/2026 |
If you would invest 0.00 in Dine Brands on November 14, 2025 and sell it all today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding Dine Brands Global or generate 0.0% return on investment in Dine Brands over 90 days. Dine Brands is related to or competes with Nike, Sea, Airbnb, OReilly Automotive, Royal Caribbean, Ferrari NV, and Marriott International. Dine Brands Global, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, owns, franchises, operates, and rents full-service restaurants... More
Dine Brands Upside/Downside Indicators
Understanding different market momentum indicators often help investors to time their next move. Potential upside and downside technical ratios enable traders to measure Dine Brands' stock current market value against overall market sentiment and can be a good tool during both bulling and bearish trends. Here we outline some of the essential indicators to assess Dine Brands Global upside and downside potential and time the market with a certain degree of confidence.
| Downside Deviation | 1.95 | |||
| Information Ratio | 0.1848 | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 13.87 | |||
| Value At Risk | (2.72) | |||
| Potential Upside | 4.67 |
Dine Brands Market Risk Indicators
Today, many novice investors tend to focus exclusively on investment returns with little concern for Dine Brands' investment risk. Other traders do consider volatility but use just one or two very conventional indicators such as Dine Brands' standard deviation. In reality, there are many statistical measures that can use Dine Brands historical prices to predict the future Dine Brands' volatility.| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.1854 | |||
| Jensen Alpha | 0.4727 | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | 0.2647 | |||
| Sortino Ratio | 0.2426 | |||
| Treynor Ratio | 0.5652 |
Dine Brands February 12, 2026 Technical Indicators
| Cycle Indicators | ||
| Math Operators | ||
| Math Transform | ||
| Momentum Indicators | ||
| Overlap Studies | ||
| Pattern Recognition | ||
| Price Transform | ||
| Statistic Functions | ||
| Volatility Indicators | ||
| Volume Indicators |
| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.1854 | |||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.5752 | |||
| Mean Deviation | 1.97 | |||
| Semi Deviation | 1.55 | |||
| Downside Deviation | 1.95 | |||
| Coefficient Of Variation | 444.16 | |||
| Standard Deviation | 2.56 | |||
| Variance | 6.55 | |||
| Information Ratio | 0.1848 | |||
| Jensen Alpha | 0.4727 | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | 0.2647 | |||
| Sortino Ratio | 0.2426 | |||
| Treynor Ratio | 0.5652 | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 13.87 | |||
| Value At Risk | (2.72) | |||
| Potential Upside | 4.67 | |||
| Downside Variance | 3.8 | |||
| Semi Variance | 2.4 | |||
| Expected Short fall | (2.43) | |||
| Skewness | 0.7097 | |||
| Kurtosis | 1.17 |
Dine Brands Global Backtested Returns
Dine Brands appears to be very steady, given 3 months investment horizon. Dine Brands Global secures Sharpe Ratio (or Efficiency) of 0.16, which denotes the company had a 0.16 % return per unit of risk over the last 3 months. We have found twenty-eight technical indicators for Dine Brands Global, which you can use to evaluate the volatility of the firm. Please utilize Dine Brands' Mean Deviation of 1.97, downside deviation of 1.95, and Coefficient Of Variation of 444.16 to check if our risk estimates are consistent with your expectations. On a scale of 0 to 100, Dine Brands holds a performance score of 12. The firm shows a Beta (market volatility) of 1.0, which means a somewhat significant risk relative to the market. Dine Brands returns are very sensitive to returns on the market. As the market goes up or down, Dine Brands is expected to follow. Please check Dine Brands' sortino ratio, skewness, period momentum indicator, as well as the relationship between the potential upside and rate of daily change , to make a quick decision on whether Dine Brands' price patterns will revert.
Auto-correlation | 0.30 |
Below average predictability
Dine Brands Global has below average predictability. Overlapping area represents the amount of predictability between Dine Brands time series from 14th of November 2025 to 29th of December 2025 and 29th of December 2025 to 12th of February 2026. The more autocorrelation exist between current time interval and its lagged values, the more accurately you can make projection about the future pattern of Dine Brands Global price movement. The serial correlation of 0.3 indicates that nearly 30.0% of current Dine Brands price fluctuation can be explain by its past prices.
| Correlation Coefficient | 0.3 | |
| Spearman Rank Test | 0.22 | |
| Residual Average | 0.0 | |
| Price Variance | 3.0 |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
| Competition |
Dine Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
Based on the recorded statements, Dine Brands Global reported net income of 64.89 M. This is 87.29% lower than that of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure sector and 78.7% lower than that of the Consumer Discretionary industry. The net income for all United States stocks is 88.64% higher than that of the company.
Dine Net Income Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Dine Brands' direct or indirect competition against its Net Income to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Dine Brands could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Dine Brands by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Dine Brands is currently under evaluation in net income category among its peers.
Dine Brands ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Dine Brands' sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Dine Brands' managers, analysts, and investors.Environmental | Governance | Social |
Dine Brands Institutional Holders
Institutional Holdings refers to the ownership stake in Dine Brands that is held by large financial organizations, pension funds or endowments. Institutions may hold large blocks of Dine Brands' outstanding shares and can exert considerable influence upon its management. Institutional holders may also work to push the share price higher once they own the stock. Extensive social media coverage, TV shows, articles in high-profile magazines, and presentations at investor conferences help move the stock higher, increasing Dine Brands' value.| Shares | State Street Corp | 2025-06-30 | 310.9 K | Two Sigma Advisers, Llc | 2025-06-30 | 308 K | Ubs Group Ag | 2025-06-30 | 281.8 K | Olstein Capital Management, L.p. | 2025-06-30 | 256 K | Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc | 2025-06-30 | 254.2 K | Trexquant Investment Lp | 2025-06-30 | 248.7 K | Woodline Partners Lp | 2025-06-30 | 237.1 K | Citadel Advisors Llc | 2025-06-30 | 237 K | Landscape Capital Management,llc | 2025-06-30 | 224.7 K | Blackrock Inc | 2025-06-30 | 1.3 M | Vanguard Group Inc | 2025-06-30 | 940 K |
Dine Fundamentals
| Return On Asset | 0.0491 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.04 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.15 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 1.96 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 14.42 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 3.78 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 77.08 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 1.98 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 13.57 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 0.62 X | ||||
| Revenue | 812.31 M | ||||
| Gross Profit | 357.17 M | ||||
| EBITDA | 178.61 M | ||||
| Net Income | 64.89 M | ||||
| Cash And Equivalents | 186.65 M | ||||
| Cash Per Share | 16.66 X | ||||
| Total Debt | 1.63 B | ||||
| Debt To Equity | 558.10 % | ||||
| Current Ratio | 1.31 X | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | (16.09) X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 108.16 M | ||||
| Short Ratio | 4.68 X | ||||
| Earnings Per Share | 2.24 X | ||||
| Price To Earnings To Growth | 2.55 X | ||||
| Target Price | 34.25 | ||||
| Number Of Employees | 992 | ||||
| Beta | 0.96 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 537.97 M | ||||
| Total Asset | 1.79 B | ||||
| Retained Earnings | 183.61 M | ||||
| Working Capital | (59.31 M) | ||||
| Current Asset | 372.71 M | ||||
| Current Liabilities | 298.43 M | ||||
| Annual Yield | 0.02 % | ||||
| Five Year Return | 4.82 % | ||||
| Net Asset | 1.79 B | ||||
| Last Dividend Paid | 2.04 |
About Dine Brands Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Dine Brands Global's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Dine Brands using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Dine Brands Global based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Pair Trading with Dine Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Dine Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Dine Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Dine Stock
| 0.8 | SGR | The Star Entertainment | PairCorr |
| 0.7 | WING | Wingstop Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
| 0.91 | CMG | Chipotle Mexican Grill | PairCorr |
Moving against Dine Stock
| 0.77 | FATBB | FAT Brands | PairCorr |
| 0.65 | ARKR | Ark Restaurants Corp | PairCorr |
| 0.56 | ALL | Aristocrat Leisure | PairCorr |
| 0.54 | PZZA | Papa Johns International | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Dine Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Dine Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Dine Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Dine Brands Global to buy it.
The correlation of Dine Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Dine Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Dine Brands Global moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Dine Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.
Will Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure sector continue expanding? Could Dine diversify its offerings? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Dine Brands. Projected growth potential of Dine fundamentally drives upward valuation adjustments. Accurate valuation requires analyzing both current fundamentals and future growth trajectories. Every Dine Brands data point contributes insight, yet successful analysis hinges on identifying the most consequential variables.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.61) | Dividend Share 2.04 | Earnings Share 2.24 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.108 |
Dine Brands Global's market price often diverges from its book value, the accounting figure shown on Dine's balance sheet. Smart investors calculate Dine Brands' intrinsic value - its true economic worth - which may differ significantly from both market price and book value. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. Since Dine Brands' trading price responds to investor sentiment, macroeconomic conditions, and market psychology, it can swing far from fundamental value.
It's important to distinguish between Dine Brands' intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding Dine Brands should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. However, Dine Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.