Full House Resorts Net Income
| FLL Stock | USD 2.35 0.03 1.29% |
As of the 2nd of February, Full House shows the Standard Deviation of 3.22, mean deviation of 2.52, and Variance of 10.35. Full House Resorts technical analysis allows you to utilize historical prices and volume patterns in order to determine a pattern that computes the direction of the firm's future prices. Please confirm Full House Resorts standard deviation, maximum drawdown, as well as the relationship between the Maximum Drawdown and kurtosis to decide if Full House Resorts is priced favorably, providing market reflects its regular price of 2.35 per share. Please also check Full House Resorts jensen alpha, which is currently at (0.23) to verify the company can sustain itself at a future point.
Full House Total Revenue |
|
Gross Profit | Profit Margin | Market Capitalization | Enterprise Value Revenue 1.9592 | Revenue |
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Net Loss | -36.6 M | -34.8 M | |
| Net Loss | -13.3 M | -12.7 M | |
| Net Loss | -36.6 M | -34.8 M | |
| Net Loss | (1.34) | (1.27) | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.90 | 0.68 |
Full | Net Income | Build AI portfolio with Full Stock |
Historical Net Income data for Full House serves as a key indicator of operational performance and financial stability. Tracking changes in this metric over time helps investors spot emerging trends before they become obvious, providing an edge in assessing whether Full House Resorts represents a compelling investment opportunity.
Latest Full House's Net Income Growth Pattern
Below is the plot of the Net Income of Full House Resorts over the last few years. Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Full House Resorts financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Full House Resorts operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue. It is Full House's Net Loss historical data analysis aims to capture in quantitative terms the overall pattern of either growth or decline in Full House's overall financial position and show how it may be relating to other accounts over time.
| View | Last Reported (40.67 M) | 10 Years Trend |
|
Net Income |
| Timeline |
Full Net Income Regression Statistics
| Arithmetic Mean | (9,180,492) | |
| Geometric Mean | 5,961,809 | |
| Coefficient Of Variation | (194.16) | |
| Mean Deviation | 13,826,048 | |
| Median | (5,028,000) | |
| Standard Deviation | 17,824,556 | |
| Sample Variance | 317.7T | |
| Range | 68.5M | |
| R-Value | (0.69) | |
| Mean Square Error | 177.3T | |
| R-Squared | 0.48 | |
| Significance | 0 | |
| Slope | (2,437,392) | |
| Total Sum of Squares | 5083.4T |
Full Net Income History
Other Fundumenentals of Full House Resorts
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | ||
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | ||
| Net Income Per Share | ||
| Net Income Per E B T |
Full House Net Income component correlations
Full Net Income Driver Correlations
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Full House is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Full Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Net Income. Since Full House's main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Full House's historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Full House's interrelated accounts and indicators.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Is Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Full House. Market participants price Full higher when confident in its future expansion prospects. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. Comprehensive Full House assessment requires weighing all these inputs, though not all factors influence outcomes equally.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.056 | Earnings Share (1.11) | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.03 | Return On Equity |
The market value of Full House Resorts is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Full that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Full House's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Full House's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Full House's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Full House's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Full House's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Full House is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. Meanwhile, Full House's quoted price indicates the marketplace figure where supply meets demand through bilateral consent.
Full House 'What if' Analysis
In the world of financial modeling, what-if analysis is part of sensitivity analysis performed to test how changes in assumptions impact individual outputs in a model. When applied to Full House's stock what-if analysis refers to the analyzing how the change in your past investing horizon will affect the profitability against the current market value of Full House.
| 11/04/2025 |
| 02/02/2026 |
If you would invest 0.00 in Full House on November 4, 2025 and sell it all today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding Full House Resorts or generate 0.0% return on investment in Full House over 90 days. Full House is related to or competes with GrowGeneration Corp, TH International, Sportsmans, Canterbury Park, Purple Innovation, Red Robin, and QVC. Full House Resorts, Inc. owns, develops, invests in, operates, manages, and leases casinos, and related hospitality and ... More
Full House Upside/Downside Indicators
Understanding different market momentum indicators often help investors to time their next move. Potential upside and downside technical ratios enable traders to measure Full House's stock current market value against overall market sentiment and can be a good tool during both bulling and bearish trends. Here we outline some of the essential indicators to assess Full House Resorts upside and downside potential and time the market with a certain degree of confidence.
| Information Ratio | (0.07) | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 16.22 | |||
| Value At Risk | (4.87) | |||
| Potential Upside | 4.86 |
Full House Market Risk Indicators
Today, many novice investors tend to focus exclusively on investment returns with little concern for Full House's investment risk. Other traders do consider volatility but use just one or two very conventional indicators such as Full House's standard deviation. In reality, there are many statistical measures that can use Full House historical prices to predict the future Full House's volatility.| Risk Adjusted Performance | (0.03) | |||
| Jensen Alpha | (0.23) | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | (0.36) | |||
| Treynor Ratio | (0.22) |
Full House February 2, 2026 Technical Indicators
| Cycle Indicators | ||
| Math Operators | ||
| Math Transform | ||
| Momentum Indicators | ||
| Overlap Studies | ||
| Pattern Recognition | ||
| Price Transform | ||
| Statistic Functions | ||
| Volatility Indicators | ||
| Volume Indicators |
| Risk Adjusted Performance | (0.03) | |||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | (0.21) | |||
| Mean Deviation | 2.52 | |||
| Coefficient Of Variation | (1,693) | |||
| Standard Deviation | 3.22 | |||
| Variance | 10.35 | |||
| Information Ratio | (0.07) | |||
| Jensen Alpha | (0.23) | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | (0.36) | |||
| Treynor Ratio | (0.22) | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 16.22 | |||
| Value At Risk | (4.87) | |||
| Potential Upside | 4.86 | |||
| Skewness | 0.4295 | |||
| Kurtosis | 0.4519 |
Full House Resorts Backtested Returns
Full House Resorts secures Sharpe Ratio (or Efficiency) of close to zero, which denotes the company had a close to zero % return per unit of risk over the last 3 months. Full House Resorts exposes twenty-three different technical indicators, which can help you to evaluate volatility embedded in its price movement. Please confirm Full House's Standard Deviation of 3.22, mean deviation of 2.52, and Variance of 10.35 to check the risk estimate we provide. The firm shows a Beta (market volatility) of 0.93, which means possible diversification benefits within a given portfolio. Full House returns are very sensitive to returns on the market. As the market goes up or down, Full House is expected to follow. At this point, Full House Resorts has a negative expected return of -0.0112%. Please make sure to confirm Full House's kurtosis, and the relationship between the maximum drawdown and day median price , to decide if Full House Resorts performance from the past will be repeated at some point in the near future.
Auto-correlation | -0.66 |
Very good reverse predictability
Full House Resorts has very good reverse predictability. Overlapping area represents the amount of predictability between Full House time series from 4th of November 2025 to 19th of December 2025 and 19th of December 2025 to 2nd of February 2026. The more autocorrelation exist between current time interval and its lagged values, the more accurately you can make projection about the future pattern of Full House Resorts price movement. The serial correlation of -0.66 indicates that around 66.0% of current Full House price fluctuation can be explain by its past prices.
| Correlation Coefficient | -0.66 | |
| Spearman Rank Test | -0.66 | |
| Residual Average | 0.0 | |
| Price Variance | 0.01 |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
| Competition |
Full Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
Based on the recorded statements, Full House Resorts reported net income of (40.67 Million). This is 107.96% lower than that of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure sector and 116.97% lower than that of the Consumer Discretionary industry. The net income for all United States stocks is 107.12% higher than that of the company.
Full Net Income Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Full House's direct or indirect competition against its Net Income to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Full House could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Full House by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Full House is currently under evaluation in net income category among its peers.
Full House ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Full House's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Full House's managers, analysts, and investors.Environmental | Governance | Social |
Full House Institutional Holders
Institutional Holdings refers to the ownership stake in Full House that is held by large financial organizations, pension funds or endowments. Institutions may hold large blocks of Full House's outstanding shares and can exert considerable influence upon its management. Institutional holders may also work to push the share price higher once they own the stock. Extensive social media coverage, TV shows, articles in high-profile magazines, and presentations at investor conferences help move the stock higher, increasing Full House's value.| Shares | Geode Capital Management, Llc | 2025-06-30 | 370 K | One Wealth Advisors, Llc | 2025-06-30 | 302.7 K | Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc. | 2025-06-30 | 260.6 K | Citadel Advisors Llc | 2025-06-30 | 250.5 K | Jane Street Group Llc | 2025-06-30 | 229.3 K | Lpl Financial Corp | 2025-06-30 | 211.3 K | Mink Brook Asset Management Llc | 2025-06-30 | 202 K | Royal Bank Of Canada | 2025-06-30 | 194.3 K | Marshall Wace Asset Management Ltd | 2025-06-30 | 186.2 K | Private Management Group Inc | 2025-06-30 | 1.7 M | R.p. Boggs & Co | 2025-06-30 | 1.6 M |
Full Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | -1.01 | ||||
| Profit Margin | (0.13) % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.04 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 587.61 M | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 36.12 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 6.70 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 44.03 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 757.42 K | ||||
| Price To Book | 6.08 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 0.28 X | ||||
| Revenue | 292.06 M | ||||
| Gross Profit | 155.14 M | ||||
| EBITDA | 42.63 M | ||||
| Net Income | (40.67 M) | ||||
| Cash And Equivalents | 108.23 M | ||||
| Cash Per Share | 3.15 X | ||||
| Total Debt | 527.67 M | ||||
| Debt To Equity | 3.83 % | ||||
| Current Ratio | 6.76 X | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | 1.14 X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 13.85 M | ||||
| Short Ratio | 4.54 X | ||||
| Earnings Per Share | (1.11) X | ||||
| Price To Earnings To Growth | (2.33) X | ||||
| Target Price | 3.75 | ||||
| Number Of Employees | 1.69 K | ||||
| Beta | 1.34 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 88.5 M | ||||
| Total Asset | 673.33 M | ||||
| Retained Earnings | (75.29 M) | ||||
| Working Capital | (14.04 M) | ||||
| Current Asset | 23.28 M | ||||
| Current Liabilities | 18.45 M | ||||
| Net Asset | 673.33 M |
About Full House Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Full House Resorts's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Full House using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Full House Resorts based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Prophet is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ProphetCheck out You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.
Is Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Full House. Market participants price Full higher when confident in its future expansion prospects. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. Comprehensive Full House assessment requires weighing all these inputs, though not all factors influence outcomes equally.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.056 | Earnings Share (1.11) | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.03 | Return On Equity |
The market value of Full House Resorts is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Full that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Full House's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Full House's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Full House's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Full House's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Full House's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Full House is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. Meanwhile, Full House's quoted price indicates the marketplace figure where supply meets demand through bilateral consent.