This module uses fundamental data of Performance Food to approximate its Piotroski F score. Performance Food F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Performance Food Group. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Performance Food financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out Performance Food Altman Z Score, Performance Food Correlation, Performance Food Valuation, as well as analyze Performance Food Alpha and Beta and Performance Food Hype Analysis.
Performance
Piotroski F Score
Market Cap
Ptb Ratio
Days Sales Outstanding
Book Value Per Share
Free Cash Flow Yield
Operating Cash Flow Per Share
Stock Based Compensation To Revenue
Capex To Depreciation
Pb Ratio
Free Cash Flow Per Share
Roic
Inventory Turnover
Net Income Per Share
Days Of Inventory On Hand
Payables Turnover
Sales General And Administrative To Revenue
Capex To Revenue
Cash Per Share
Pocfratio
Interest Coverage
Capex To Operating Cash Flow
Pfcf Ratio
Days Payables Outstanding
Ev To Operating Cash Flow
Pe Ratio
Return On Tangible Assets
Ev To Free Cash Flow
Earnings Yield
Intangibles To Total Assets
Net Debt To E B I T D A
Current Ratio
Tangible Book Value Per Share
Receivables Turnover
Graham Number
Shareholders Equity Per Share
Capex Per Share
Graham Net Net
Revenue Per Share
Interest Debt Per Share
Debt To Assets
Enterprise Value Over E B I T D A
Short Term Coverage Ratios
Price Earnings Ratio
Operating Cycle
Price Book Value Ratio
Price Earnings To Growth Ratio
Days Of Payables Outstanding
Price To Operating Cash Flows Ratio
Price To Free Cash Flows Ratio
Pretax Profit Margin
Ebt Per Ebit
Operating Profit Margin
Company Equity Multiplier
Long Term Debt To Capitalization
Total Debt To Capitalization
Return On Capital Employed
Ebit Per Revenue
Quick Ratio
Dividend Paid And Capex Coverage Ratio
Cash Ratio
Cash Conversion Cycle
Operating Cash Flow Sales Ratio
Days Of Inventory Outstanding
Days Of Sales Outstanding
Free Cash Flow Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Cash Flow Coverage Ratios
Price To Book Ratio
Fixed Asset Turnover
Capital Expenditure Coverage Ratio
Price Cash Flow Ratio
Enterprise Value Multiple
Debt Ratio
Cash Flow To Debt Ratio
Return On Assets
Asset Turnover
Net Profit Margin
Price Fair Value
Change To Inventory
Change In Cash
Free Cash Flow
Change In Working Capital
Begin Period Cash Flow
Other Cashflows From Financing Activities
Depreciation
Other Non Cash Items
Capital Expenditures
Total Cash From Operating Activities
Net Income
Total Cash From Financing Activities
End Period Cash Flow
Sale Purchase Of Stock
Dividends Paid
Other Cashflows From Investing Activities
Change To Netincome
Change To Liabilities
Change To Account Receivables
Stock Based Compensation
Net Borrowings
Total Cashflows From Investing Activities
Change To Operating Activities
Investments
Change Receivables
Cash And Cash Equivalents Changes
Cash Flows Other Operating
Total Assets
Short Long Term Debt Total
Other Current Liab
Total Current Liabilities
Total Stockholder Equity
Property Plant And Equipment Net
Net Debt
Retained Earnings
Accounts Payable
Cash
Non Current Assets Total
Non Currrent Assets Other
Cash And Short Term Investments
Net Receivables
Good Will
Common Stock Total Equity
Common Stock Shares Outstanding
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity
Non Current Liabilities Total
Inventory
Other Current Assets
Other Stockholder Equity
Total Liab
Property Plant And Equipment Gross
Total Current Assets
Short Term Debt
Intangible Assets
Common Stock
Other Assets
Long Term Debt
Property Plant Equipment
Current Deferred Revenue
Other Liab
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Net Tangible Assets
Deferred Long Term Liab
Long Term Investments
Short Long Term Debt
Long Term Debt Total
Capital Surpluse
Retained Earnings Total Equity
Short Term Investments
Capital Lease Obligations
Non Current Liabilities Other
Net Invested Capital
Net Working Capital
Capital Stock
Depreciation And Amortization
Interest Expense
Total Revenue
Gross Profit
Other Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Ebit
Ebitda
Cost Of Revenue
Total Operating Expenses
Income Before Tax
Total Other Income Expense Net
Income Tax Expense
Selling General Administrative
Net Income Applicable To Common Shares
Net Income From Continuing Ops
Tax Provision
Net Interest Income
Non Operating Income Net Other
Reconciled Depreciation
Selling And Marketing Expenses
Probability Of Bankruptcy
At present, Performance Food's Net Debt is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Short Term Debt is expected to grow to about 616.8 M, whereas Short and Long Term Debt is forecasted to decline to about 92 M. At present, Performance Food's Book Value Per Share is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Operating Cash Flow Per Share is expected to grow to 2.03, whereas PTB Ratio is forecasted to decline to 0.73.
At this time, it appears that Performance Food's Piotroski F Score is Healthy. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Performance Food is to make sure Performance is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Performance Food's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Performance Food's financial numbers are properly reported.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Performance Food's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Performance Food in a much-optimized way.
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.
Book Value Per Share
26.01
At present, Performance Food's Book Value Per Share is projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting.
Performance Food ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Performance Food's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Performance Food's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social
About Performance Food Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Performance Food Group's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Performance Food using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Performance Food Group based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.
When determining whether Performance Food offers a strong return on investment in its stock, a comprehensive analysis is essential. The process typically begins with a thorough review of Performance Food's financial statements, including income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, to assess its financial health. Key financial ratios are used to gauge profitability, efficiency, and growth potential of Performance Food Group Stock. Outlined below are crucial reports that will aid in making a well-informed decision on Performance Food Group Stock:
You can also try the Portfolio Holdings module to check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing.
Is Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Performance Food. If investors know Performance will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Performance Food listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
(0.10)
Earnings Share
2.71
Revenue Per Share
357.357
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.032
Return On Assets
0.0378
The market value of Performance Food is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Performance that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Performance Food's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Performance Food's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Performance Food's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Performance Food's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Performance Food's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Performance Food is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Performance Food's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.