Premium Brands Holdings Stock Net Income
| PRBZF Stock | USD 73.00 0.91 1.26% |
As of the 8th of February, Premium Brands holds the Coefficient Of Variation of 1606.05, semi deviation of 1.37, and Risk Adjusted Performance of 0.0552. Compared to fundamental indicators, the technical analysis model allows you to check existing technical drivers of Premium Brands, as well as the relationship between them. Please check Premium Brands Holdings information ratio, as well as the relationship between the potential upside and kurtosis to decide if Premium Brands Holdings is priced some-what accurately, providing market reflects its current price of 73.0 per share. Given that Premium Brands has jensen alpha of 0.1004, we recommend you to check out Premium Brands Holdings's recent market performance to make sure the company can sustain itself at a future point.
Premium Brands' financial statements offer valuable quarterly and annual insights to potential investors, highlighting the company's current and historical financial position, overall management performance, and changes in financial standing over time. Key fundamentals influencing Premium Brands' valuation are provided below:Premium Brands Holdings does not presently have any trending fundamental ratios for analysis. This module does not cover all equities due to inconsistencies in global equity categorizations. Continue to Equity Screeners to view more equity screening tools. Premium |
Premium Brands 'What if' Analysis
In the world of financial modeling, what-if analysis is part of sensitivity analysis performed to test how changes in assumptions impact individual outputs in a model. When applied to Premium Brands' pink sheet what-if analysis refers to the analyzing how the change in your past investing horizon will affect the profitability against the current market value of Premium Brands.
| 11/10/2025 |
| 02/08/2026 |
If you would invest 0.00 in Premium Brands on November 10, 2025 and sell it all today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding Premium Brands Holdings or generate 0.0% return on investment in Premium Brands over 90 days. Premium Brands is related to or competes with Morningstar Unconstrained, T Rowe, First Physicians, SEI Investments, Us Government, Techtronic Industries, and Virtus Dfa. Premium Brands Holdings Corporation, through its subsidiaries, manufactures and distributes food products primarily in C... More
Premium Brands Upside/Downside Indicators
Understanding different market momentum indicators often help investors to time their next move. Potential upside and downside technical ratios enable traders to measure Premium Brands' pink sheet current market value against overall market sentiment and can be a good tool during both bulling and bearish trends. Here we outline some of the essential indicators to assess Premium Brands Holdings upside and downside potential and time the market with a certain degree of confidence.
| Downside Deviation | 1.72 | |||
| Information Ratio | 0.0069 | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 11.09 | |||
| Value At Risk | (2.19) | |||
| Potential Upside | 2.71 |
Premium Brands Market Risk Indicators
Today, many novice investors tend to focus exclusively on investment returns with little concern for Premium Brands' investment risk. Other traders do consider volatility but use just one or two very conventional indicators such as Premium Brands' standard deviation. In reality, there are many statistical measures that can use Premium Brands historical prices to predict the future Premium Brands' volatility.| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.0552 | |||
| Jensen Alpha | 0.1004 | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | (0.07) | |||
| Sortino Ratio | 0.0065 | |||
| Treynor Ratio | (0.75) |
Premium Brands February 8, 2026 Technical Indicators
| Cycle Indicators | ||
| Math Operators | ||
| Math Transform | ||
| Momentum Indicators | ||
| Overlap Studies | ||
| Pattern Recognition | ||
| Price Transform | ||
| Statistic Functions | ||
| Volatility Indicators | ||
| Volume Indicators |
| Risk Adjusted Performance | 0.0552 | |||
| Market Risk Adjusted Performance | (0.74) | |||
| Mean Deviation | 1.11 | |||
| Semi Deviation | 1.37 | |||
| Downside Deviation | 1.72 | |||
| Coefficient Of Variation | 1606.05 | |||
| Standard Deviation | 1.62 | |||
| Variance | 2.62 | |||
| Information Ratio | 0.0069 | |||
| Jensen Alpha | 0.1004 | |||
| Total Risk Alpha | (0.07) | |||
| Sortino Ratio | 0.0065 | |||
| Treynor Ratio | (0.75) | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 11.09 | |||
| Value At Risk | (2.19) | |||
| Potential Upside | 2.71 | |||
| Downside Variance | 2.95 | |||
| Semi Variance | 1.89 | |||
| Expected Short fall | (1.45) | |||
| Skewness | (0.39) | |||
| Kurtosis | 4.49 |
Premium Brands Holdings Backtested Returns
Premium Brands appears to be very steady, given 3 months investment horizon. Premium Brands Holdings maintains Sharpe Ratio (i.e., Efficiency) of 0.15, which implies the firm had a 0.15 % return per unit of risk over the last 3 months. We have found twenty-nine technical indicators for Premium Brands Holdings, which you can use to evaluate the volatility of the company. Please evaluate Premium Brands' Coefficient Of Variation of 1606.05, risk adjusted performance of 0.0552, and Semi Deviation of 1.37 to confirm if our risk estimates are consistent with your expectations. On a scale of 0 to 100, Premium Brands holds a performance score of 11. The company holds a Beta of -0.12, which implies not very significant fluctuations relative to the market. As returns on the market increase, returns on owning Premium Brands are expected to decrease at a much lower rate. During the bear market, Premium Brands is likely to outperform the market. Please check Premium Brands' potential upside, and the relationship between the total risk alpha and kurtosis , to make a quick decision on whether Premium Brands' historical price patterns will revert.
Auto-correlation | -0.73 |
Almost perfect reverse predictability
Premium Brands Holdings has almost perfect reverse predictability. Overlapping area represents the amount of predictability between Premium Brands time series from 10th of November 2025 to 25th of December 2025 and 25th of December 2025 to 8th of February 2026. The more autocorrelation exist between current time interval and its lagged values, the more accurately you can make projection about the future pattern of Premium Brands Holdings price movement. The serial correlation of -0.73 indicates that around 73.0% of current Premium Brands price fluctuation can be explain by its past prices.
| Correlation Coefficient | -0.73 | |
| Spearman Rank Test | -0.46 | |
| Residual Average | 0.0 | |
| Price Variance | 3.9 |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
| Competition |
Based on the recorded statements, Premium Brands Holdings reported net income of 132.7 M. This is 87.99% lower than that of the Food Products sector and 235.76% lower than that of the Consumer Staples industry. The net income for all United States stocks is 76.76% higher than that of the company.
Premium Net Income Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Premium Brands' direct or indirect competition against its Net Income to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the pink sheets which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Premium Brands could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Premium Brands by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Premium Brands is currently under evaluation in net income category among its peers.
Premium Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | 0.0976 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.0355 | |||
| Profit Margin | 0.03 % | |||
| Operating Margin | 0.04 % | |||
| Current Valuation | 4.56 B | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 44.81 M | |||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 1.85 % | |||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 49.83 % | |||
| Price To Earning | 33.77 X | |||
| Price To Book | 2.04 X | |||
| Price To Sales | 0.48 X | |||
| Revenue | 4.93 B | |||
| Gross Profit | 901.9 M | |||
| EBITDA | 377.8 M | |||
| Net Income | 132.7 M | |||
| Cash And Equivalents | 13.8 M | |||
| Cash Per Share | 0.31 X | |||
| Total Debt | 1.41 B | |||
| Debt To Equity | 1.33 % | |||
| Current Ratio | 2.53 X | |||
| Book Value Per Share | 40.79 X | |||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 66.3 M | |||
| Earnings Per Share | 2.79 X | |||
| Number Of Employees | 21 | |||
| Beta | 0.99 | |||
| Market Capitalization | 3.5 B | |||
| Total Asset | 4.41 B | |||
| Z Score | 2.2 | |||
| Annual Yield | 0.03 % | |||
| Five Year Return | 2.20 % | |||
| Net Asset | 4.41 B | |||
| Last Dividend Paid | 2.74 |
About Premium Brands Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Premium Brands Holdings's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Premium Brands using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Premium Brands Holdings based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis
| FSLY | Fastly Class A | |
| MOB | Mobilicom Limited American | |
| CMG | Chipotle Mexican Grill | |
| CSAN | Cosan SA ADR | |
| RKT | Rocket Companies |
Other Information on Investing in Premium Pink Sheet
Premium Brands financial ratios help investors to determine whether Premium Pink Sheet is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Premium with respect to the benefits of owning Premium Brands security.