Premium Brands Holdings Stock Net Income
| PRBZF Stock | USD 56.67 0.33 0.58% |
Premium Brands Holdings fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Premium Brands' financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Premium Pink Sheet. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Premium Brands' intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Premium Brands pink sheet.
Premium |
Premium Brands Holdings Company Net Income Analysis
Premium Brands' Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
Current Premium Brands Net Income | 132.7 M |
Most of Premium Brands' fundamental indicators, such as Net Income, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Premium Brands Holdings is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
| Competition |
Based on the recorded statements, Premium Brands Holdings reported net income of 132.7 M. This is 87.99% lower than that of the Food Products sector and 235.76% lower than that of the Consumer Staples industry. The net income for all United States stocks is 76.76% higher than that of the company.
Premium Net Income Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Premium Brands' direct or indirect competition against its Net Income to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the pink sheets which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Premium Brands could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Premium Brands by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Premium Brands is currently under evaluation in net income category among its peers.
Premium Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | 0.0976 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.0355 | |||
| Profit Margin | 0.03 % | |||
| Operating Margin | 0.04 % | |||
| Current Valuation | 4.56 B | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 44.81 M | |||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 1.85 % | |||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 49.83 % | |||
| Price To Earning | 33.77 X | |||
| Price To Book | 2.04 X | |||
| Price To Sales | 0.48 X | |||
| Revenue | 4.93 B | |||
| Gross Profit | 901.9 M | |||
| EBITDA | 377.8 M | |||
| Net Income | 132.7 M | |||
| Cash And Equivalents | 13.8 M | |||
| Cash Per Share | 0.31 X | |||
| Total Debt | 1.41 B | |||
| Debt To Equity | 1.33 % | |||
| Current Ratio | 2.53 X | |||
| Book Value Per Share | 40.79 X | |||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 66.3 M | |||
| Earnings Per Share | 2.79 X | |||
| Number Of Employees | 21 | |||
| Beta | 0.99 | |||
| Market Capitalization | 3.5 B | |||
| Total Asset | 4.41 B | |||
| Z Score | 2.2 | |||
| Annual Yield | 0.03 % | |||
| Five Year Return | 2.20 % | |||
| Net Asset | 4.41 B | |||
| Last Dividend Paid | 2.74 |
About Premium Brands Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Premium Brands Holdings's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Premium Brands using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Premium Brands Holdings based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis
Other Information on Investing in Premium Pink Sheet
Premium Brands financial ratios help investors to determine whether Premium Pink Sheet is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Premium with respect to the benefits of owning Premium Brands security.