Under Armour C Stock EBITDA
UA Stock | USD 8.72 0.29 3.44% |
Under Armour C fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Under Armour's financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Under Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Under Armour's intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Under Armour stock.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
EBITDA | 372.3 M | 421.4 M |
Under | EBITDA |
Under Armour C Company EBITDA Analysis
Under Armour's EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.
Current Under Armour EBITDA | 372.34 M |
Most of Under Armour's fundamental indicators, such as EBITDA, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Under Armour C is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
Under EBITDA Driver Correlations
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Under Armour is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Under Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as EBITDA. Since Under Armour's main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Under Armour's historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Under Armour's interrelated accounts and indicators.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Under EBITDA Historical Pattern
Today, most investors in Under Armour Stock are looking for potential investment opportunities by analyzing not only static indicators but also various Under Armour's growth ratios. Consistent increases or drops in fundamental ratios usually indicate a possible pattern that can be successfully translated into profits. However, when comparing two companies, knowing each company's ebitda growth rates may not be enough to decide which company is a better investment. That's why investors frequently use a static breakdown of Under Armour ebitda as a starting point in their analysis.
Under Armour EBITDA |
Timeline |
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
Competition |
Under Ebitda
Ebitda |
|
According to the company disclosure, Under Armour C reported earnings before interest,tax, depreciation and amortization of 372.34 M. This is 63.74% lower than that of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods sector and 22.13% lower than that of the Consumer Discretionary industry. The ebitda for all United States stocks is 90.45% higher than that of the company.
Under EBITDA Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Under Armour's direct or indirect competition against its EBITDA to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Under Armour could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Under Armour by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Under Armour is currently under evaluation in ebitda category among its peers.
Under Armour ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Under Armour's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Under Armour's managers, analysts, and investors.Environmental | Governance | Social |
Under Armour Institutional Holders
Institutional Holdings refers to the ownership stake in Under Armour that is held by large financial organizations, pension funds or endowments. Institutions may purchase large blocks of Under Armour's outstanding shares and can exert considerable influence upon its management. Institutional holders may also work to push the share price higher once they own the stock. Extensive social media coverage, TV shows, articles in high-profile magazines, and presentations at investor conferences help move the stock higher, increasing Under Armour's value.Shares | D. E. Shaw & Co Lp | 2024-09-30 | 1.4 M | Nuveen Asset Management, Llc | 2024-06-30 | 1.4 M | Bank Of New York Mellon Corp | 2024-06-30 | 1.3 M | Amvescap Plc. | 2024-06-30 | 1.1 M | Ci Private Wealth Llc | 2024-06-30 | 1 M | Northern Trust Corp | 2024-09-30 | 997.6 K | Schonfeld Strategic Advisors Llc | 2024-09-30 | 801.2 K | American Century Companies Inc | 2024-09-30 | 797.2 K | Nordea Investment Mgmt Bank Demark A/s | 2024-09-30 | 716.1 K | Bdt Capital Partners, Llc | 2024-09-30 | 60 M | Blackrock Inc | 2024-06-30 | 16.9 M |
Under Fundamentals
Return On Equity | -0.0087 | ||||
Return On Asset | 0.0284 | ||||
Profit Margin | (0) % | ||||
Operating Margin | 0.1 % | ||||
Current Valuation | 4.75 B | ||||
Shares Outstanding | 209.12 M | ||||
Shares Owned By Insiders | 9.14 % | ||||
Shares Owned By Institutions | 77.11 % | ||||
Number Of Shares Shorted | 8.87 M | ||||
Price To Earning | 17.81 X | ||||
Price To Book | 1.90 X | ||||
Price To Sales | 0.73 X | ||||
Revenue | 5.7 B | ||||
Gross Profit | 2.42 B | ||||
EBITDA | 372.34 M | ||||
Net Income | 232.04 M | ||||
Cash And Equivalents | 711.91 M | ||||
Cash Per Share | 1.89 X | ||||
Total Debt | 1.44 B | ||||
Debt To Equity | 0.83 % | ||||
Current Ratio | 2.09 X | ||||
Book Value Per Share | 4.59 X | ||||
Cash Flow From Operations | 353.97 M | ||||
Short Ratio | 2.87 X | ||||
Earnings Per Share | (0.04) X | ||||
Price To Earnings To Growth | 2.24 X | ||||
Target Price | 14.0 | ||||
Number Of Employees | 6.8 K | ||||
Beta | 1.66 | ||||
Market Capitalization | 3.95 B | ||||
Total Asset | 4.76 B | ||||
Retained Earnings | 1.05 B | ||||
Working Capital | 1.7 B | ||||
Current Asset | 1.5 B | ||||
Current Liabilities | 478.81 M | ||||
Net Asset | 4.76 B |
About Under Armour Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Under Armour C's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Under Armour using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Under Armour C based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Also Currently Popular
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.Check out Under Armour Piotroski F Score and Under Armour Altman Z Score analysis. You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.
Is Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Under Armour. If investors know Under will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Under Armour listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.686 | Earnings Share (0.04) | Revenue Per Share 12.41 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.11) | Return On Assets 0.0284 |
The market value of Under Armour C is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Under that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Under Armour's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Under Armour's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Under Armour's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Under Armour's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Under Armour's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Under Armour is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Under Armour's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.