City Income Tax Expense vs Extraordinary Items Analysis
CHCO Stock | USD 131.79 1.83 1.41% |
City Holding financial indicator trend analysis is way more than just evaluating City Holding prevailing accounting drivers to predict future trends. We encourage investors to analyze account correlations over time for multiple indicators to determine whether City Holding is a good investment. Please check the relationship between City Holding Income Tax Expense and its Extraordinary Items accounts. Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in City Holding. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in main economic indicators. To learn how to invest in City Stock, please use our How to Invest in City Holding guide.
Income Tax Expense vs Extraordinary Items
Income Tax Expense vs Extraordinary Items Correlation Analysis
The overlapping area represents the amount of trend that can be explained by analyzing historical patterns of City Holding Income Tax Expense account and Extraordinary Items. At this time, the significance of the direction appears to have no relationship.
The correlation between City Holding's Income Tax Expense and Extraordinary Items is 0.07. Overlapping area represents the amount of variation of Income Tax Expense that can explain the historical movement of Extraordinary Items in the same time period over historical financial statements of City Holding, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical values of City Holding's Income Tax Expense and Extraordinary Items is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these accounts tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which Income Tax Expense of City Holding are associated (or correlated) with its Extraordinary Items. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when Extraordinary Items has no effect on the direction of Income Tax Expense i.e., City Holding's Income Tax Expense and Extraordinary Items go up and down completely randomly.
Correlation Coefficient | 0.07 |
Relationship Direction | Positive |
Relationship Strength | Insignificant |
Income Tax Expense
Extraordinary Items
Most indicators from City Holding's fundamental ratios are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing fundamental ratios indicators one by one will only give a small insight into City Holding current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of fundamental ratios indicators, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in City Holding. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in main economic indicators. To learn how to invest in City Stock, please use our How to Invest in City Holding guide.At this time, City Holding's Sales General And Administrative To Revenue is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 24th of November 2024, Enterprise Value is likely to grow to about 884.1 M, while Selling General Administrative is likely to drop about 44 M.
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | Operating Income | 111.2M | 137.0M | 148.3M | 155.7M | Other Operating Expenses | 107.6M | 5.6M | 108.1M | 78.3M |
City Holding fundamental ratios Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
City Holding Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
City Holding fundamental ratios Accounts
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 16.3M | 16.0M | 15.4M | 14.9M | 14.9M | 13.5M | |
Total Assets | 5.0B | 5.8B | 6.0B | 5.9B | 6.2B | 6.5B | |
Short Long Term Debt Total | 215.3M | 296.0M | 312.5M | 291.0M | 434.9M | 456.6M | |
Total Stockholder Equity | 658.4M | 701.1M | 681.1M | 577.9M | 677.1M | 710.9M | |
Property Plant And Equipment Net | 77.0M | 76.9M | 74.1M | 70.8M | 72.1M | 56.5M | |
Net Debt | (136.1M) | (232.7M) | (322.2M) | 91.0M | 278.6M | 292.5M | |
Retained Earnings | 539.3M | 590.0M | 641.8M | 706.7M | 780.3M | 819.3M | |
Cash | 140.1M | 528.7M | 634.6M | 200M | 156.3M | 120.3M | |
Non Current Assets Total | 1.1B | 1.4B | 1.6B | 1.7B | 6.0B | 6.3B | |
Non Currrent Assets Other | (6.7M) | (17.6M) | (63K) | (44.9M) | 4.4B | 4.6B | |
Other Assets | 3.0B | 2.6B | 2.3B | 2.4B | 2.8B | 1.7B | |
Cash And Short Term Investments | 950.3M | 1.7B | 2.0B | 1.7B | 156.3M | 148.5M | |
Net Receivables | 11.6M | 15.8M | 15.6M | 18.3M | 20.3M | 11.3M | |
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity | 5.0B | 5.8B | 6.0B | 5.9B | 6.2B | 6.5B | |
Non Current Liabilities Total | 4.1M | 3.2M | 2.5B | 1.9B | 5.5B | 5.8B | |
Other Stockholder Equity | 65.3M | 32.3M | (22.6M) | (45.0M) | (40.3M) | (38.3M) | |
Total Liab | 4.1M | 3.2M | 5.3B | 5.3B | 5.5B | 5.8B | |
Property Plant And Equipment Gross | 77.0M | 76.9M | 178.0M | 176.9M | 182.2M | 191.3M | |
Total Current Assets | 961.8M | 1.7B | 2.1B | 1.7B | 156.3M | 148.5M | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | 6.2M | 31.2M | 14.3M | (131.5M) | (110.5M) | (105.0M) | |
Total Current Liabilities | 1.9B | 2.5B | 2.8B | 3.4B | 3.4B | 3.6B | |
Short Term Debt | 211.3M | 296.0M | 312.5M | 291.0M | 334.9M | 180.2M | |
Other Current Liab | 1.7B | 2.2B | 2.5B | 3.1B | (334.9M) | (318.1M) | |
Other Liab | 50.2M | 109.4M | 84.8M | 74.4M | 85.5M | 46.8M | |
Accounts Payable | 4.1B | 4.7B | 4.9B | 4.9B | 5.6B | 3.0B | |
Short Term Investments | 810.1M | 1.2B | 1.4B | 1.5B | 1.3B | 1.4B | |
Inventory | (156.4M) | (546.2M) | (651.6M) | (219.2M) | 102.7M | 107.9M | |
Treasury Stock | (105.0M) | (139.0M) | (193.5M) | (216.0M) | (194.4M) | (184.6M) | |
Property Plant Equipment | 77.0M | 76.9M | 74.1M | 70.8M | 81.4M | 68.8M | |
Intangible Assets | 120.2M | 118.6M | 117.1M | 115.7M | 12.7M | 12.0M | |
Other Current Assets | 156.4M | 546.2M | 651.6M | 219.2M | 177.3M | 168.4M | |
Net Tangible Assets | 537.7M | 582.5M | 564.0M | 462.1M | 531.4M | 449.5M | |
Retained Earnings Total Equity | 539.3M | 590.0M | 641.8M | 706.7M | 812.7M | 505.3M | |
Capital Surpluse | 170.3M | 171.3M | 170.9M | 171.0M | 196.6M | 149.9M | |
Long Term Investments | 3.6B | 3.6B | 1.4B | 1.5B | 1.4B | 2.1B |
Pair Trading with City Holding
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if City Holding position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in City Holding will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with City Stock
0.97 | AX | Axos Financial | PairCorr |
0.97 | BY | Byline Bancorp Fiscal Year End 23rd of January 2025 | PairCorr |
0.97 | PB | Prosperity Bancshares Fiscal Year End 22nd of January 2025 | PairCorr |
Moving against City Stock
0.44 | CFG-PE | Citizens Financial | PairCorr |
0.42 | TFC-PO | Truist Financial | PairCorr |
0.41 | TFC-PR | Truist Financial | PairCorr |
0.38 | WF | Woori Financial Group | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to City Holding could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace City Holding when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back City Holding - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling City Holding to buy it.
The correlation of City Holding is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as City Holding moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if City Holding moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for City Holding can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in City Holding. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in main economic indicators. To learn how to invest in City Stock, please use our How to Invest in City Holding guide.You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.
Is Regional Banks space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of City Holding. If investors know City will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about City Holding listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.019 | Dividend Share 2.93 | Earnings Share 7.8 | Revenue Per Share 19.688 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.026 |
The market value of City Holding is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of City that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of City Holding's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is City Holding's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because City Holding's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect City Holding's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between City Holding's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if City Holding is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, City Holding's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.