NVIDIA Profitability Analysis
| NVDA Stock | USD 180.34 5.27 2.84% |
Net Income | First Reported 1999-04-30 | Previous Quarter 26.4 B | Current Value 31.9 B | Quarterly Volatility 5.6 B |
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.39 | 0.6234 |
|
| |||||
| Net Profit Margin | 0.14 | 0.2598 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.15 | 0.2718 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.16 | 0.2644 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Assets | 0.12 | 0.1505 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Equity | 0.18 | 0.2564 |
|
|
For NVIDIA profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of NVIDIA to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well NVIDIA utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between NVIDIA's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of NVIDIA over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
NVIDIA's Revenue Breakdown by Earning Segment
Check out Correlation Analysis.
NVIDIA Revenue Breakdown by Earning Segment
By analyzing NVIDIA's earnings estimates, investors can diagnose different trends across NVIDIA's analyst sentiment over time as well as compare current estimates against different timeframes.
Is Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of NVIDIA. Anticipated expansion of NVIDIA directly elevates investor willingness to pay premium valuations. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. Comprehensive NVIDIA assessment requires weighing all these inputs, though not all factors influence outcomes equally.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.667 | Dividend Share 0.04 | Earnings Share 4.05 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.625 |
Understanding NVIDIA requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects NVIDIA's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value - what NVIDIA's is actually worth based on fundamentals - guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push NVIDIA's price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
It's important to distinguish between NVIDIA's intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding NVIDIA should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. In contrast, NVIDIA's trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.
NVIDIA Return On Asset vs. Return On Equity Fundamental Analysis
Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining NVIDIA's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare NVIDIA value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth. NVIDIA is regarded third in return on equity category among its peers. It is considered to be number one stock in return on asset category among its peers reporting about 0.50 of Return On Asset per Return On Equity. The ratio of Return On Equity to Return On Asset for NVIDIA is roughly 2.01 . At present, NVIDIA's Return On Equity is projected to increase slightly based on the last few years of reporting. The reason why the comparable model can be used in almost all circumstances is due to the vast number of multiples that can be utilized, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-cash flow (P/CF), and many others. The P/E ratio is the most commonly used of these ratios because it focuses on the NVIDIA's earnings, one of the primary drivers of an investment's value.NVIDIA's Earnings Breakdown by Geography
NVIDIA Return On Asset vs. Return On Equity
Return on Equity or ROE tells company stockholders how effectually their money is being utilized or reinvested. It is a useful ratio when analyzing company profitability or the management effectiveness given the capital invested by the shareholders. ROE shows how efficiently a company utilizes investments to generate income.
NVIDIA |
| = | 1.07 |
For most industries, Return on Equity between 10% and 30% are considered desirable to provide dividends to owners and have funds for the future growth of the company. Investors should be very careful using ROE as the only efficiency indicator because ROE can be high if a company is heavily leveraged.
Return on Asset or ROA shows how effective is the management of the company in generating income from utilizing all of the assets at their disposal. It is a useful ratio to evaluate the performance of different departments of a company as well as to understand management performance over time.
NVIDIA |
| = | 0.54 |
Return on Asset measures overall efficiency of a company in generating profits from its total assets. It is expressed as the percentage of profits earned per dollar of Asset. A low ROA typically means that a company is asset-intensive and therefore will needs more money to continue generating revenue in the future.
NVIDIA Return On Asset Comparison
NVIDIA is currently under evaluation in return on asset category among its peers.
NVIDIA Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in NVIDIA, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, NVIDIA will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of NVIDIA's change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of NVIDIA, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | 32.2 M | 33.8 M | |
| Operating Income | 93.7 B | 98.4 B | |
| Income Before Tax | 96.6 B | 101.5 B | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | 3 B | 3.1 B | |
| Net Income | 83.8 B | 88 B | |
| Income Tax Expense | 12.8 B | 13.5 B | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 5 B | 5.3 B | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 83.8 B | 88 B | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | 251.8 M | 264.4 M | |
| Interest Income | 2.1 B | 2.2 B | |
| Net Interest Income | 1.8 B | 1.9 B | |
| Change To Netincome | 670.5 M | 484.9 M | |
| Net Income Per Share | 0.18 | 0.17 | |
| Income Quality | 1.34 | 1.41 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.98 | 0.69 |
NVIDIA Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on NVIDIA. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of NVIDIA position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the NVIDIA's important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.
NVIDIA Profitability Trends
NVIDIA profitability trend refers to the progression of profit or loss within a business. An upward trend means that NVIDIA's profit has generally increased over time, and a downward profitability trend means profits are declining. Recognizing problems early in profitability trends allows investors to address revenue and cost issues in advance. Investors and analysts usually monitor three types of profitability trends: gross, operating, and net. Gross profit is the difference between revenue and costs of goods sold. Operating profit is NVIDIA's gross profit minus its overhead. After you account for other unusual revenue, expenses, and costs, you get net profit. Gross profit trends are often a good indicator of future profitability. If you have high gross profit margins, you have a better chance to cover overhead and make money.
NVIDIA Profitability Drivers Correlations
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize and read into endless financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties. Understanding the correlation between NVIDIA different financial indicators related to revenue and profit generation helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards NVIDIA in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between profit drivers that are directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to break down NVIDIA's future profitability.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
NVIDIA Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The calculation of NVIDIA's earning per share is based on the data from the past 12 consecutive months, used for reporting the company's financial figures. The next projected EPS of NVIDIA is estimated to be 1.653 with the future projection ranging from a low of 1.42 to a high of 1.98. Please be aware that this consensus of annual earnings estimates for NVIDIA is based on EPS before non-recurring items and includes expenses related to employee stock options.Last Reported EPS
1.42 Lowest | Expected EPS | 1.98 Highest |
NVIDIA Earnings Projection Consensus
Suppose the current estimates of NVIDIA's value are higher than the current market price of the NVIDIA stock. In this case, investors may conclude that NVIDIA is overpriced and will exhibit bullish sentiment. On the other hand, if the present value is lower than the stock price, analysts may conclude that the market undervalues the equity. These scenarios may suggest that the market is not as efficient as it should be at the estimation time, and NVIDIA's stock will quickly adjusts to the new information provided by the consensus estimate.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 30th of April 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 63 | 87.18% | 0.0 | 1.653 | 4.05 |
NVIDIA Earnings History
Earnings estimate consensus by NVIDIA analysts from Wall Street is used by the market to judge NVIDIA's stock performance. Investors also use these earnings estimates to evaluate and project the stock performance into the future in order to make their investment decisions. However, we suggest analyzing not only NVIDIA's upcoming profit reports and earnings-per-share forecasts but also comparing them to our different valuation methods.NVIDIA Quarterly Gross Profit |
|
Sophisticated investors, who have witnessed many market ups and downs, anticipate that the market will even out over time. This tendency of NVIDIA's price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion. However, historically, high market prices usually discourage investors that believe in mean reversion to invest, while low prices are viewed as an opportunity to buy.
NVIDIA Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual Earning per Share of NVIDIA refers to what the company shows during its earnings calls or quarterly reports. The Expected EPS is what analysts covering NVIDIA predict the company's earnings will be in the future. The higher the earnings per share of NVIDIA, the better is its profitability. While calculating the Earning per Share, we use the weighted ratio, as the number of shares outstanding can change over time.NVIDIA Estimated Months Earnings per Share
For an investor who is primarily interested in generating an income out of investing in entities such as NVIDIA, the EPS ratio can tell if the company is intending to increase its current dividend. Although EPS is an essential tool for investors, it should not be used in isolation. EPS of NVIDIA should always be considered in relation to other companies to make a more educated investment decision.NVIDIA Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Earnings surprises can significantly impact NVIDIA's stock price both in the short term and over time. Negative earnings surprises usually result in a price decline. However, it has been seen that positive earnings surprises lead to an immediate rise in a stock's price and a gradual increase over time. This is why we often hear news about some companies beating earning projections. Financial analysts spend a large amount of time predicting earnings per share (EPS) along with other important future indicators. Many analysts use forecasting models, management guidance, and additional fundamental information to derive an EPS estimate.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
null | null | null | null | null | 0 | ||
2025-11-19 | 2025-10-31 | 1.24 | 1.3 | 0.06 | 4 | ||
2025-08-27 | 2025-07-31 | 1.01 | 1.05 | 0.04 | 3 | ||
2025-05-28 | 2025-04-30 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.06 | 8 | ||
2025-02-26 | 2025-01-31 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.04 | 4 | ||
2024-11-20 | 2024-10-31 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.06 | 8 | ||
2024-08-28 | 2024-07-31 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.05 | 7 | ||
2024-05-22 | 2024-04-30 | 0.559 | 0.612 | 0.053 | 9 | ||
2024-02-21 | 2024-01-31 | 0.461 | 0.516 | 0.055 | 11 | ||
2023-11-21 | 2023-10-31 | 0.336 | 0.402 | 0.066 | 19 | ||
2023-08-23 | 2023-07-31 | 0.207 | 0.27 | 0.063 | 30 | ||
2023-05-24 | 2023-04-30 | 0.092 | 0.109 | 0.017 | 18 | ||
2023-02-22 | 2023-01-31 | 0.081 | 0.088 | 0.007 | 8 | ||
2022-11-16 | 2022-10-31 | 0.071 | 0.058 | -0.013 | 18 | ||
2022-08-24 | 2022-07-31 | 0.0499 | 0.051 | 0.0011 | 2 | ||
2022-05-25 | 2022-04-30 | 0.13 | 0.136 | 0.006 | 4 | ||
2022-02-16 | 2022-01-31 | 0.123 | 0.132 | 0.009 | 7 | ||
2021-11-17 | 2021-10-31 | 0.111 | 0.117 | 0.006 | 5 | ||
2021-08-18 | 2021-07-31 | 0.102 | 0.104 | 0.002 | 1 | ||
2021-05-26 | 2021-04-30 | 0.0822 | 0.0915 | 0.0093 | 11 | ||
2021-02-24 | 2021-01-31 | 0.08 | 0.0775 | -0.0025 | 3 | ||
2020-11-18 | 2020-10-31 | 0.064 | 0.073 | 0.009 | 14 | ||
2020-08-19 | 2020-07-31 | 0.049 | 0.055 | 0.006 | 12 | ||
2020-05-21 | 2020-04-30 | 0.042 | 0.045 | 0.003 | 7 | ||
2020-02-13 | 2020-01-31 | 0.05 | 0.0473 | -0.0027 | 5 | ||
2019-11-14 | 2019-10-31 | 0.039 | 0.045 | 0.006 | 15 | ||
2019-08-15 | 2019-07-31 | 0.029 | 0.031 | 0.002 | 6 | ||
2019-05-16 | 2019-04-30 | 0.02 | 0.022 | 0.002 | 10 | ||
2019-02-14 | 2019-01-31 | 0.019 | 0.02 | 0.001 | 5 | ||
2018-11-15 | 2018-10-31 | 0.047 | 0.046 | -0.001 | 2 | ||
2018-08-16 | 2018-07-31 | 0.044 | 0.049 | 0.005 | 11 | ||
2018-05-10 | 2018-04-30 | 0.04 | 0.051 | 0.011 | 27 | ||
2018-02-08 | 2018-01-31 | 0.029 | 0.039 | 0.01 | 34 | ||
2017-11-09 | 2017-10-31 | 0.024 | 0.033 | 0.009 | 37 | ||
2017-08-10 | 2017-07-31 | 0.017 | 0.023 | 0.006 | 35 | ||
2017-05-09 | 2017-04-30 | 0.016 | 0.02 | 0.004 | 25 | ||
2017-02-09 | 2017-01-31 | 0.021 | 0.025 | 0.004 | 19 | ||
2016-11-10 | 2016-10-31 | 0.014 | 0.021 | 0.007 | 50 | ||
2016-08-11 | 2016-07-31 | 0.009 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 11 | ||
2016-05-12 | 2016-04-30 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2016-02-17 | 2016-01-31 | 0.008 | 0.009 | 0.001 | 12 | ||
2015-11-05 | 2015-10-31 | 0.006 | 0.011 | 0.005 | 83 | ||
2015-08-06 | 2015-07-31 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 33 | ||
2015-05-07 | 2015-04-30 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2015-02-11 | 2015-01-31 | 0.007 | 0.009 | 0.002 | 28 | ||
2014-11-06 | 2014-10-31 | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.001 | 14 | ||
2014-08-07 | 2014-07-31 | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 20 | ||
2014-05-06 | 2014-04-30 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.002 | 50 | ||
2014-02-12 | 2014-01-31 | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 20 | ||
2013-11-07 | 2013-10-31 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2013-08-08 | 2013-07-31 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 33 | ||
2013-05-09 | 2013-04-30 | 0.002 | 0.0045 | 0.0025 | 125 | ||
2013-02-13 | 2013-01-31 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 16 | ||
2012-11-08 | 2012-10-31 | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.001 | 14 | ||
2012-08-09 | 2012-07-31 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.002 | 50 | ||
2012-05-11 | 2012-04-30 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 50 | ||
2012-02-15 | 2012-01-31 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2011-11-10 | 2011-10-31 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 16 | ||
2011-08-11 | 2011-07-31 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2011-05-12 | 2011-04-30 | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 20 | ||
2011-02-16 | 2011-01-31 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.002 | 50 | ||
2010-11-11 | 2010-10-31 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2010-08-12 | 2010-07-31 | 0.003 | 0.001 | -0.002 | 66 | ||
2010-05-13 | 2010-04-30 | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 20 | ||
2010-02-17 | 2010-01-31 | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 20 | ||
2009-11-05 | 2009-10-31 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.002 | 66 | ||
2009-08-06 | 2009-07-31 | -0.001 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 300 | ||
2009-05-07 | 2009-04-30 | -0.003 | -0.002 | 0.001 | 33 | ||
2009-02-10 | 2009-01-31 | -0.002 | -0.004 | -0.002 | 100 | ||
2008-11-06 | 2008-10-31 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.002 | 66 | ||
2008-08-12 | 2008-07-31 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2008-05-08 | 2008-04-30 | 0.01 | 0.009 | -0.001 | 10 | ||
2008-02-13 | 2008-01-31 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2007-11-08 | 2007-10-31 | 0.009 | 0.011 | 0.002 | 22 | ||
2007-08-09 | 2007-07-31 | 0.007 | 0.009 | 0.002 | 28 | ||
2007-05-10 | 2007-04-30 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 16 | ||
2007-02-13 | 2007-01-31 | 0.007 | 0.009 | 0.002 | 28 | ||
2006-11-09 | 2006-10-31 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 16 | ||
2006-05-11 | 2006-04-30 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2006-02-16 | 2006-01-31 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2005-11-09 | 2005-10-31 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 33 | ||
2005-08-11 | 2005-07-31 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2005-05-12 | 2005-04-30 | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.004 | 200 | ||
2005-02-17 | 2005-01-31 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 50 | ||
2004-11-04 | 2004-10-31 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 100 | ||
2004-08-05 | 2004-07-31 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 100 | ||
2004-05-06 | 2004-04-30 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 100 | ||
2004-02-12 | 2004-01-31 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 200 | ||
2003-11-06 | 2003-10-31 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2003-08-07 | 2003-07-31 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2003-05-08 | 2003-04-30 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2003-02-13 | 2003-01-31 | 0.002 | 0.001 | -0.001 | 50 | ||
2002-11-07 | 2002-10-31 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-08-15 | 2002-07-31 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-05-22 | 2002-04-30 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-02-14 | 2002-01-31 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 33 | ||
2001-11-08 | 2001-10-31 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2001-08-14 | 2001-07-31 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2001-05-22 | 2001-04-30 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2001-02-15 | 2001-01-31 | 0.002 | 0.001 | -0.001 | 50 | ||
2000-11-09 | 2000-10-31 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2000-08-21 | 2000-07-31 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2000-05-16 | 2000-04-30 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2000-02-15 | 2000-01-31 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1999-11-18 | 1999-10-31 | 0.002 | 0.001 | -0.001 | 50 | ||
1999-08-18 | 1999-07-31 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1999-05-18 | 1999-04-30 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 100 |
Use NVIDIA in pair-trading
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if NVIDIA position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in NVIDIA will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.NVIDIA Pair Trading
NVIDIA Pair Trading Analysis
The ability to find closely correlated positions to NVIDIA could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace NVIDIA when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back NVIDIA - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling NVIDIA to buy it.
The correlation of NVIDIA is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as NVIDIA moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if NVIDIA moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for NVIDIA can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Use Investing Themes to Complement your NVIDIA position
In addition to having NVIDIA in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Russia On Wall Street Thematic Idea Now
Russia On Wall Street
Cross-sector and cross-instrument bundle of publicly traded Russian entities that are expected to be listed on USA exchanges or over the counter. The Russia On Wall Street theme has 23 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Russia On Wall Street Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Correlation Analysis. For information on how to trade NVIDIA Stock refer to our How to Trade NVIDIA Stock guide.You can also try the Portfolio Center module to all portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios.
To fully project NVIDIA's future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of NVIDIA at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include NVIDIA's income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.