NVIDIA Competitors
| NVDA Stock | USD 186.94 3.11 1.64% |
NVIDIA vs Entegris Correlation
Modest diversification
The correlation between NVIDIA and ENTG is 0.22 (i.e., Modest diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding NVIDIA and ENTG in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving against NVIDIA Stock
As of February 12, 2026, Return On Tangible Assets is expected to decline to 0.14. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is expected to decline to 0.17. At present, NVIDIA's Total Assets are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Non Current Assets Total is expected to grow to about 38 B, whereas Intangible Assets are forecasted to decline to about 525.2 M.Sophisticated investors, who have witnessed many market ups and downs, anticipate that the market will even out over time. This tendency of NVIDIA's price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion. However, historically, high market prices usually discourage investors that believe in mean reversion to invest, while low prices are viewed as an opportunity to buy.
NVIDIA Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between NVIDIA and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of NVIDIA and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of NVIDIA does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between NVIDIA Stock performing well and NVIDIA Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze NVIDIA's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | 0.87 | (0.08) | 0.00 | (0.06) | 0.00 | 2.16 | 5.61 | |||
| MSFT | 1.34 | (0.34) | 0.00 | (0.77) | 0.00 | 1.90 | 13.28 | |||
| TSM | 1.68 | 0.31 | 0.16 | 0.33 | 1.73 | 3.48 | 9.62 | |||
| AVGO | 2.14 | (0.14) | 0.00 | (0.03) | 0.00 | 3.76 | 22.53 | |||
| GOOGL | 1.30 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.33 | 1.37 | 3.11 | 9.53 | |||
| ADI | 1.42 | 0.48 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.98 | 3.64 | 8.10 | |||
| IMOS | 2.99 | 0.81 | 0.23 | (4.94) | 2.53 | 8.27 | 23.93 | |||
| TER | 2.61 | 0.72 | 0.25 | 0.43 | 2.44 | 6.98 | 18.32 | |||
| ENTG | 2.75 | 0.49 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 2.48 | 8.09 | 13.92 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare NVIDIA and related stocks such as Apple Inc, Microsoft, and Taiwan Semiconductor Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | 61.2 M | 41.7 B | 37 B | 39.5 B | 53.4 B | 45.7 B | 48.4 B | 59.5 B | 55.3 B | 57.4 B | 94.7 B | 99.8 B | 97 B | 93.7 B | 112 B | 128.8 B | 135.3 B |
| MSFT | 39.3 M | 17 B | 21.9 B | 22.1 B | 12.2 B | 20.5 B | 25.5 B | 16.6 B | 39.2 B | 44.3 B | 61.3 B | 72.7 B | 72.4 B | 88.1 B | 101.8 B | 117.1 B | 123 B |
| TSM | 18 B | 134.2 B | 159.5 B | 184 B | 254.3 B | 302.9 B | 331.7 B | 345 B | 363.1 B | 353.9 B | 510.7 B | 592.4 B | 992.9 B | 851.7 B | 1.2 T | 1.7 T | 1.8 T |
| AVGO | (251 M) | 563 M | 552 M | 263 M | 1.4 B | (1.7 B) | 1.7 B | 12.3 B | 2.7 B | 3 B | 6.7 B | 11.5 B | 14.1 B | 5.9 B | 23.1 B | 26.6 B | 27.9 B |
| GOOGL | (6 M) | 9.7 B | 10.7 B | 12.7 B | 14.1 B | 16.3 B | 19.5 B | 12.7 B | 30.7 B | 34.3 B | 40.3 B | 76 B | 60 B | 73.8 B | 100.1 B | 132.2 B | 138.8 B |
| ADI | 29.7 M | 651.2 M | 673.5 M | 629.3 M | 696.9 M | 861.7 M | 805.4 M | 1.5 B | 1.4 B | 1.2 B | 1.4 B | 2.7 B | 3.3 B | 1.6 B | 2.3 B | 2.6 B | 2.7 B |
| IMOS | 361.9 M | 361.9 M | 1.2 B | 2.3 B | 3.4 B | 2.1 B | 1.7 B | 3 B | 1.3 B | 2.5 B | 2.4 B | 4.9 B | 3.4 B | 2 B | 1.4 B | 1.7 B | 2.5 B |
| TER | 20.2 M | 349.4 M | 217 M | 164.9 M | 81.3 M | 206.5 M | (43.4 M) | 257.7 M | 451.8 M | 467.5 M | 784.1 M | 1 B | 715.5 M | 448.8 M | 542.4 M | 554 M | 581.7 M |
| ENTG | 6 M | 123.8 M | 68.8 M | 74.5 M | 7.9 M | 80.3 M | 97.1 M | 85.1 M | 240.8 M | 254.9 M | 295 M | 409.1 M | 208.9 M | 180.7 M | 292.8 M | 235.6 M | 247.4 M |
NVIDIA and related stocks such as Apple Inc, Microsoft, and Taiwan Semiconductor Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in NVIDIA financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of NVIDIA operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.NVIDIA Competitive Analysis
The better you understand NVIDIA competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, NVIDIA's competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across NVIDIA's competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
NVIDIA Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of NVIDIA Competition
NVIDIA's competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by NVIDIA in relation to its competition. NVIDIA's competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of NVIDIA in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact NVIDIA's competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to NVIDIA, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your NVIDIA position
In addition to having NVIDIA in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Conservative Funds Thematic Idea Now
Conservative Funds
Funds or Etfs that invest using buy-and-hold investment strategy in companies with consistent growth over many years of operation. The Conservative Funds theme has 46 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Conservative Funds Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out NVIDIA Correlation with its peers. For information on how to trade NVIDIA Stock refer to our How to Trade NVIDIA Stock guide.You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.
Is Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of NVIDIA. Anticipated expansion of NVIDIA directly elevates investor willingness to pay premium valuations. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. Comprehensive NVIDIA assessment requires weighing all these inputs, though not all factors influence outcomes equally.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.667 | Dividend Share 0.04 | Earnings Share 4.07 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.625 |
Understanding NVIDIA requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects NVIDIA's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value - what NVIDIA's is actually worth based on fundamentals - guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push NVIDIA's price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
It's important to distinguish between NVIDIA's intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding NVIDIA should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. In contrast, NVIDIA's trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.
