KMRK Competitors
| KMRK Stock | 1.81 0.15 7.65% |
K Tech vs HWH International Correlation
Good diversification
The correlation between K Tech Solutions and HWH is -0.15 (i.e., Good diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding K Tech Solutions and HWH in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving together with KMRK Stock
Moving against KMRK Stock
K Tech Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between K Tech and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of KMRK and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of K Tech Solutions does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between KMRK Stock performing well and K Tech Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze K Tech's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMA | 3.91 | (1.16) | 0.00 | (0.48) | 0.00 | 11.02 | 23.43 | |||
| MI | 2.82 | 0.50 | 0.13 | 0.48 | 3.04 | 8.57 | 23.69 | |||
| MOGU | 3.02 | 0.01 | (0.01) | 0.10 | 3.60 | 6.37 | 24.99 | |||
| BGI | 2.66 | (0.45) | 0.00 | (0.64) | 0.00 | 6.33 | 27.29 | |||
| MGIH | 4.20 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 4.29 | 4.67 | 9.93 | 42.24 | |||
| JL | 2.65 | 0.00 | (0.01) | 0.05 | 5.70 | 6.61 | 36.81 | |||
| TLF | 1.93 | 0.52 | 0.23 | 1.19 | 1.43 | 3.38 | 30.59 | |||
| FORD | 2.66 | (0.53) | 0.00 | (1.90) | 0.00 | 5.50 | 27.12 | |||
| ROLR | 17.75 | 5.39 | 0.45 | 3.76 | 10.39 | 17.33 | 472.27 | |||
| HWH | 4.63 | (0.17) | 0.00 | (0.01) | 0.00 | 11.18 | 42.42 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare K Tech Solutions and related stocks such as Alta Global Group, NFT Limited, and MOGU Inc Net Income Over Time
| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMA | (11.2 M) | (11.2 M) | (11.2 M) | (11.2 M) | (11.2 M) | (11.2 M) | (11.2 M) | (11.2 M) | (11.2 M) | (11.2 M) | (11.2 M) | (11.2 M) | (20.6 M) | (14.4 M) | (16.8 M) | (15.2 M) | (15.9 M) |
| MI | 6.4 M | 6.4 M | 6.4 M | 6.4 M | 6.4 M | 6.4 M | 6.4 M | (1.1 M) | (7.6 M) | (4.1 M) | (612.6 K) | (30.1 M) | (10.4 M) | 5.2 M | 6.3 M | 5.7 M | 6 M |
| MOGU | (939.1 M) | (939.1 M) | (939.1 M) | (939.1 M) | (939.1 M) | (939.1 M) | (939.1 M) | (558.2 M) | (486.3 M) | (2.2 B) | (328 M) | (639.8 M) | (178 M) | (59.3 M) | (62.6 M) | (71.9 M) | (75.5 M) |
| BGI | (3.9 M) | 218.5 K | 1.5 M | (6.4 M) | (10.9 M) | 7.1 M | 6.6 M | 11.4 M | (19.9 M) | (18.5 M) | (8.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (7.4 M) | (4.6 M) | (12.8 M) | (11.5 M) | (11 M) |
| MGIH | 4 M | 4 M | 4 M | 4 M | 4 M | 4 M | 4 M | 4 M | 4 M | 4 M | 3.7 M | 4.1 M | (354.1 K) | (8.8 M) | (6.3 M) | (5.7 M) | (5.4 M) |
| JL | 290.5 K | 290.5 K | 290.5 K | 290.5 K | 290.5 K | 290.5 K | 290.5 K | 290.5 K | 290.5 K | 290.5 K | 290.5 K | 576 K | 849.1 K | 783.7 K | 2.6 M | 3 M | 3.1 M |
| TLF | 1.2 M | 4.8 M | 5.6 M | 7.3 M | 7.7 M | 6.4 M | 6.4 M | 4.5 M | 2 M | (1.9 M) | (4.9 M) | 1.4 M | 1.2 M | 3.8 M | 827 K | 951 K | 903.5 K |
| ROLR | 68.5 K | 68.5 K | 68.5 K | 68.5 K | 68.5 K | 68.5 K | 68.5 K | 68.5 K | 68.5 K | 68.5 K | 68.5 K | 978.4 K | (3.1 M) | (2.8 M) | (5.9 M) | (5.3 M) | (5.1 M) |
| HWH | 632.1 K | 632.1 K | 632.1 K | 632.1 K | 632.1 K | 632.1 K | 632.1 K | 632.1 K | 632.1 K | 632.1 K | (5 K) | 113.5 K | (1.1 M) | (2.6 M) | (2.6 M) | (2.3 M) | (2.2 M) |
K Tech Solutions and related stocks such as Alta Global Group, NFT Limited, and MOGU Inc Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in K Tech Solutions financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of K Tech Solutions operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.K Tech Competitive Analysis
The better you understand K Tech competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, K Tech's competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across K Tech's competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
K Tech Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of K Tech Competition
K Tech's competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by K Tech Solutions in relation to its competition. K Tech's competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of K Tech in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact K Tech's competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to K Tech Solutions, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your K Tech position
In addition to having K Tech in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Health Management Thematic Idea Now
Health Management
Major hospitals and healthcare providers. The Health Management theme has 43 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Health Management Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out K Tech Correlation with its peers. You can also try the Competition Analyzer module to analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities.
Is Leisure space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of K Tech. Expected growth trajectory for KMRK significantly influences the price investors are willing to assign. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. Comprehensive K Tech assessment requires weighing all these inputs, though not all factors influence outcomes equally.
Earnings Share 0.03 | Revenue Per Share 1.003 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.10) | Return On Assets 0.0461 | Return On Equity |
Understanding K Tech Solutions requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects KMRK's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value - what K Tech's is actually worth based on fundamentals - guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push K Tech's price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
Understanding that K Tech's value differs from its trading price is crucial, as each reflects different aspects of the company. Evaluating whether K Tech represents a sound investment requires analyzing earnings trends, revenue growth, technical signals, industry dynamics, and expert forecasts. In contrast, K Tech's trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.