Voyager Competitors
| VOYG Stock | 25.09 2.57 9.29% |
Voyager Technologies vs Eve Holding Correlation
Modest diversification
The correlation between Voyager Technologies and EVEX is 0.24 (i.e., Modest diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Voyager Technologies and EVEX in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving together with Voyager Stock
| 0.89 | BA | Boeing | PairCorr |
| 0.77 | GD | General Dynamics | PairCorr |
| 0.83 | AIR | AAR Corp | PairCorr |
| 0.9 | FLY | Firefly Aerospace Common | PairCorr |
Moving against Voyager Stock
| 0.71 | PBCRY | Bank Central Asia | PairCorr |
| 0.46 | PBCRF | PT Bank Central | PairCorr |
| 0.38 | BKRKF | PT Bank Rakyat Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
Sophisticated investors, who have witnessed many market ups and downs, anticipate that the market will even out over time. This tendency of Voyager Technologies' price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion. However, historically, high market prices usually discourage investors that believe in mean reversion to invest, while low prices are viewed as an opportunity to buy.
Voyager Technologies Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Voyager Technologies and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Voyager and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Voyager Technologies does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Voyager Stock performing well and Voyager Technologies Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Voyager Technologies' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDRE | 1.54 | (0.10) | 0.00 | (0.02) | 0.00 | 4.07 | 10.56 | |||
| ATRO | 2.34 | 0.59 | 0.25 | 0.48 | 2.00 | 6.28 | 15.01 | |||
| MVST | 3.25 | (1.19) | 0.00 | (0.62) | 0.00 | 6.02 | 18.37 | |||
| VVX | 1.47 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 1.61 | 3.81 | 11.60 | |||
| AMPX | 4.98 | 0.41 | 0.06 | 2.40 | 5.65 | 11.63 | 29.24 | |||
| LUNR | 5.91 | 0.75 | 0.12 | 0.43 | 6.15 | 11.76 | 47.22 | |||
| KMT | 1.78 | 0.78 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.44 | 4.97 | 17.95 | |||
| NSP | 2.42 | (0.11) | (0.01) | 0.00 | 4.22 | 4.91 | 20.54 | |||
| DCO | 1.53 | 0.32 | 0.20 | 0.26 | 1.46 | 4.61 | 12.32 | |||
| EVEX | 2.78 | (0.32) | 0.00 | (0.11) | 0.00 | 5.46 | 19.07 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare Voyager Technologies and related stocks such as Cadre Holdings, Astronics, and Microvast Holdings Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDRE | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | 38.5 M | 12.7 M | 5.8 M | 38.6 M | 36.1 M | 41.6 M | 23.8 M |
| ATRO | 800 K | 21.6 M | 21.9 M | 27.3 M | 56.2 M | 67 M | 48.4 M | 19.7 M | 46.8 M | 52 M | (115.8 M) | (25.6 M) | (35.7 M) | (26.4 M) | (16.2 M) | (18.6 M) | (17.7 M) |
| MVST | (100 M) | (100 M) | (100 M) | (100 M) | (100 M) | (100 M) | (100 M) | (100 M) | (100 M) | (72.6 M) | (49.6 M) | (216 M) | (158.2 M) | (106.3 M) | (195.5 M) | (175.9 M) | (184.7 M) |
| VVX | 54 M | 54 M | 74.7 M | 84 M | 22.8 M | 31 M | 23.7 M | 59.5 M | 35.3 M | 33.2 M | 37 M | 45.7 M | (14.3 M) | (22.6 M) | 34.7 M | 31.2 M | 28.5 M |
| AMPX | (7.4 M) | (7.4 M) | (7.4 M) | (7.4 M) | (7.4 M) | (7.4 M) | (7.4 M) | (7.4 M) | (7.4 M) | (7.4 M) | (7.4 M) | (9.9 M) | (17.3 M) | (36.8 M) | (44.7 M) | (40.2 M) | (38.2 M) |
| LUNR | (4.3 M) | (4.3 M) | (4.3 M) | (4.3 M) | (4.3 M) | (4.3 M) | (4.3 M) | (4.3 M) | (4.3 M) | (4.3 M) | (4.3 M) | (35.6 M) | (6.4 M) | 62.8 M | (283.4 M) | (255.1 M) | (242.3 M) |
| KMT | 600 K | 307.2 M | 203.3 M | 158.4 M | (373.9 M) | (226 M) | 49.1 M | 200.2 M | 241.9 M | (5.7 M) | 54.4 M | 144.6 M | 118.5 M | 109.3 M | 93.1 M | 107.1 M | 66.2 M |
| NSP | 1.1 M | 30.5 M | 40.4 M | 32 M | 28 M | 39.4 M | 66 M | 84.4 M | 135.4 M | 151.1 M | 138.2 M | 124.1 M | 179.3 M | 171 M | 91 M | 104.7 M | 58.8 M |
| DCO | (3.9 M) | (47.6 M) | 16.4 M | 9.3 M | 19.9 M | (73.3 M) | 25.3 M | 20.1 M | 9 M | 32.5 M | 29.2 M | 135.5 M | 28.8 M | 15.9 M | 31.5 M | 36.2 M | 38 M |
| EVEX | (5 M) | (5 M) | (5 M) | (5 M) | (5 M) | (5 M) | (5 M) | (5 M) | (5 M) | (7.7 M) | (16.7 M) | (18.3 M) | (174 M) | (127.7 M) | (138.2 M) | (124.4 M) | (118.1 M) |
Voyager Technologies and related stocks such as Cadre Holdings, Astronics, and Microvast Holdings Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Voyager Technologies financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Voyager Technologies operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Voyager Technologies Competitive Analysis
The better you understand Voyager Technologies competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Voyager Technologies' competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Voyager Technologies' competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Voyager Technologies Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of Voyager Technologies Competition
Voyager Technologies' competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Voyager Technologies in relation to its competition. Voyager Technologies' competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Voyager Technologies in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Voyager Technologies' competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Voyager Technologies, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your Voyager Technologies position
In addition to having Voyager Technologies in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Biotech Thematic Idea Now
Biotech
Companies specialized in biotechnology production and delivery of pharmaceuticals services. The Biotech theme has 26 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Biotech Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Voyager Technologies Correlation with its peers. For more detail on how to invest in Voyager Stock please use our How to Invest in Voyager Technologies guide.You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.
Can Aerospace & Defense industry sustain growth momentum? Does Voyager have expansion opportunities? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Voyager Technologies. If investors know Voyager will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. Determining accurate worth demands scrutiny of both present operating results and projected expansion capacity. Evaluating Voyager Technologies demands reviewing these metrics collectively while recognizing certain factors exert disproportionate influence.
The market value of Voyager Technologies is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Voyager that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Voyager Technologies' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Voyager Technologies' true underlying value. Market participants employ diverse analytical approaches to determine fair value and identify buying opportunities when prices dip below calculated worth. Because Voyager Technologies' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Voyager Technologies' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Voyager Technologies' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Voyager Technologies is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. Meanwhile, Voyager Technologies' quoted price indicates the marketplace figure where supply meets demand through bilateral consent.