Asbury Automotive Competitors
| ABG Stock | USD 203.06 1.05 0.52% |
Asbury Automotive vs Dorman Products Correlation Summary
Minimal diversification benefit
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between Asbury Automotive and Dorman Products stands at 0.92, or Minimal diversification benefit. Lower overlap tends to improve diversification, while higher overlap means both positions carry similar risk.
| 0.92 | EVGO | Evgo Inc | PairCorr |
| 0.94 | CWH | Camping World Holdings Buyout Trend | PairCorr |
| 0.74 | PAG | Penske Automotive Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
Mean reversion analysis in Asbury Automotive's involves identifying price extremes that diverge materially from the historical norm. High prices relative to historical norms contrast with unusually low prices, where recovery expectations may emerge. Mean reversion in Asbury Automotive is distinct from trend following, which rides momentum rather than betting on reversals.
Asbury Automotive Competition Correlation Matrix
Reviewing how Asbury Automotive Group moves relative to competing stocks can show whether peer exposure is reducing portfolio risk or simply repeating the same market bet. The useful question is whether competitors are behaving like true alternatives or simply tracking the same sector move with different volatility.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Evaluating Asbury Stock requires separating price momentum from underlying operating strength versus competitors. Without risk-adjusted context, short-term returns may appear stronger than the volatility required to achieve them would suggest. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPI | 1.43 | -0.20 | 0.00 | -0.25 | 0.00 | 3.11 | 10.03 | |||
| RUSHA | 1.54 | 0.29 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 1.63 | 4.15 | 9.09 | |||
| GPK | 2.26 | -0.70 | 0.00 | -0.55 | 0.00 | 4.45 | 17.60 | |||
| MTH | 1.74 | -0.03 | 0.00 | -0.02 | 0.00 | 4.39 | 9.62 | |||
| EAT | 2.36 | -0.17 | 0.00 | -0.11 | 0.00 | 4.45 | 11.86 | |||
| KBH | 1.59 | -0.07 | 0.00 | -0.06 | 0.00 | 3.99 | 10.72 | |||
| DOOO | 1.79 | -0.36 | 0.00 | 3.69 | 0.00 | 3.18 | 7.50 | |||
| GNTX | 1.30 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 1.35 | 3.69 | 6.23 | |||
| DORM | 1.47 | -0.17 | 0.00 | -0.18 | 0.00 | 2.65 | 12.07 |
Asbury Automotive Competitive Analysis
Sizing up Asbury Automotive against Group 1, Rush Enterprises, and Graphic Packaging reveals meaningful differences in scale and efficiency. At a 3.90 B valuation, Asbury Automotive brings in 18.00 B on the top line. The company converts revenue to profit at a 2.73% rate and delivers 13.31% on shareholder equity. Profit margins tilt toward Asbury Automotive at 2.73% against Group 1 at 1.44%. Top-line revenue favors Asbury Automotive by a wide margin: 18.00 B to 7.43 B. Graphic Packaging carries a higher earnings multiple of 17.46x compared to 10.61x for Asbury Automotive.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Asbury Automotive Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Asbury Automotive Against Peers
Asbury Automotive's peer analysis compares Asbury Automotive with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Asbury Automotive trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Asbury Automotive leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Market share trends show Asbury Automotive gaining ground while several peers have seen flat or declining positions. Cash return on invested capital at Asbury Automotive versus peers strips out accounting noise and measures real economic profit. Competition analysis is informative when price, margins, leverage, and growth are read together. For peer comparison, Asbury Automotive has a market cap of 3.9 B, P/E of 10.61, profit margin of 2.73%.
Asbury Automotive Group data is compiled from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and standardized for comparability.
Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Ellen Johnson, Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board