Graphic Competitors
| GPK Stock | USD 14.65 0.10 0.69% |
Graphic Packaging vs Greif Bros Correlation
Excellent diversification
The correlation between Graphic Packaging Holding and GEF is -0.6 (i.e., Excellent diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Graphic Packaging Holding and GEF in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving against Graphic Stock
| 0.61 | ATCOL | Atlas Corp | PairCorr |
| 0.49 | CAS | Cascades | PairCorr |
| 0.48 | 002969 | Jiamei Food Packaging | PairCorr |
| 0.44 | 301355 | Fujian Nanwang Envir | PairCorr |
| 0.35 | PKG | Packaging Corp | PairCorr |
Graphic Packaging Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Graphic Packaging and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Graphic and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Graphic Packaging Holding does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Graphic Stock performing well and Graphic Packaging Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Graphic Packaging's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEE | 1.00 | 0.33 | 0.28 | (0.36) | 0.51 | 2.13 | 19.98 | |||
| SLGN | 1.24 | (0.06) | 0.00 | (0.04) | 0.00 | 2.44 | 13.57 | |||
| SON | 1.06 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 0.38 | 0.85 | 3.18 | 6.16 | |||
| REYN | 1.00 | (0.03) | 0.00 | (0.07) | 0.00 | 2.25 | 9.71 | |||
| MTH | 1.68 | (0.07) | 0.00 | (0.01) | 0.00 | 3.46 | 13.79 | |||
| ABG | 1.42 | (0.04) | (0.01) | 0.01 | 1.74 | 3.65 | 10.40 | |||
| EAT | 2.24 | 0.34 | 0.12 | 0.43 | 2.43 | 6.16 | 12.88 | |||
| KBH | 1.48 | (0.17) | 0.00 | (0.08) | 0.00 | 4.30 | 15.09 | |||
| FTDR | 1.71 | (0.24) | 0.00 | (0.17) | 0.00 | 3.10 | 17.53 | |||
| GEF | 1.13 | 0.25 | 0.14 | 1.45 | 1.36 | 2.61 | 5.52 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare Graphic Packaging Holding and related stocks such as Sealed Air, Silgan Holdings, and Sonoco Products Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEE | 2.9 B | 149.1 M | (1.1 B) | 124.2 M | 258.1 M | 335.4 M | 486.4 M | 814.9 M | 193.1 M | 263 M | 502.9 M | 506.8 M | 491.6 M | 341.6 M | 264.7 M | 238.2 M | 247.4 M |
| SLGN | (13 M) | 193.2 M | 151.3 M | 185.4 M | 182.4 M | 172.4 M | 153.4 M | 269.7 M | 224 M | 193.8 M | 308.7 M | 359.1 M | 340.8 M | 64.4 M | 276.4 M | 317.8 M | 333.7 M |
| SON | 49.4 M | 217.5 M | 195.3 M | 209.8 M | 225.9 M | 250.1 M | 286.4 M | 175.3 M | 313.6 M | 291.8 M | 207.5 M | (85.5 M) | 466.4 M | 475 M | 163.9 M | 188.5 M | 183.5 M |
| REYN | 68 M | 68 M | 68 M | 68 M | 68 M | 68 M | 79 M | 302 M | 176 M | 225 M | 363 M | 324 M | 258 M | 298 M | 352 M | 404.8 M | 268.9 M |
| MTH | 6.5 M | (21.1 M) | 105.2 M | 124.5 M | 142.2 M | 128.7 M | 149.5 M | 143.3 M | 227.3 M | 249.7 M | 423.5 M | 737.4 M | 992.2 M | 738.7 M | 786.2 M | 453 M | 475.7 M |
| ABG | 1.6 M | 67.9 M | 82.2 M | 109.1 M | 111.6 M | 169.2 M | 167.2 M | 139.1 M | 168 M | 184.4 M | 254.4 M | 532.4 M | 997.3 M | 602.5 M | 430.3 M | 494.8 M | 519.6 M |
| EAT | 4.8 M | 151.2 M | 163.4 M | 154 M | 196.7 M | 200.7 M | 150.8 M | 125.9 M | 154.9 M | 24.4 M | 131.6 M | 117.6 M | 102.6 M | 155.3 M | 383.1 M | 440.6 M | 462.6 M |
| KBH | 23.1 M | (59 M) | 40 M | 918.3 M | 84.6 M | 105.6 M | 180.6 M | 170.4 M | 268.8 M | 296.2 M | 564.7 M | 816.7 M | 590.2 M | 655 M | 428.8 M | 493.1 M | 517.8 M |
| FTDR | 120 M | 120 M | 120 M | 120 M | 120 M | 120 M | 124 M | 160 M | 125 M | 153 M | 112 M | 128 M | 71 M | 171 M | 235 M | 270.2 M | 153.9 M |
| GEF | 33.8 M | 126.1 M | 147.3 M | 91.5 M | 71.9 M | 74.9 M | 118.6 M | 209.4 M | 171 M | 108.8 M | 390.7 M | 376.7 M | 359.2 M | 266 M | 840 M | 966 M | 1 B |
Graphic Packaging Holding and related stocks such as Sealed Air, Silgan Holdings, and Sonoco Products Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Graphic Packaging Holding financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Graphic Packaging Holding operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Graphic Packaging Competitive Analysis
The better you understand Graphic Packaging competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Graphic Packaging's competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Graphic Packaging's competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Graphic Packaging Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of Graphic Packaging Competition
Graphic Packaging's competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Graphic Packaging Holding in relation to its competition. Graphic Packaging's competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Graphic Packaging in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Graphic Packaging's competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Graphic Packaging Holding, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your Graphic Packaging position
In addition to having Graphic Packaging in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Electronics Thematic Idea Now
Electronics
Companies manufacturing electronic appliances and goods. The Electronics theme has 33 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Electronics Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Graphic Packaging Correlation with its peers. You can also try the Sign In To Macroaxis module to sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules.
Is Paper & Plastic Packaging Products & Materials space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Graphic Packaging. Market participants price Graphic higher when confident in its future expansion prospects. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. Comprehensive Graphic Packaging assessment requires weighing all these inputs, though not all factors influence outcomes equally.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.13) | Dividend Share 0.43 | Earnings Share 1.7 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.01) |
The market value of Graphic Packaging Holding is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Graphic that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Graphic Packaging's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Graphic Packaging's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Graphic Packaging's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Graphic Packaging's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Graphic Packaging's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Graphic Packaging is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. Meanwhile, Graphic Packaging's quoted price indicates the marketplace figure where supply meets demand through bilateral consent.
