WW Grainger Competitors
| GWW Stock | USD 1,235 0.93 0.08% |
Correlation: WW Grainger vs PACCAR Summary
Poor diversification
The correlation between WW Grainger and PACCAR is 0.67, which Macroaxis classifies as Poor diversification for the selected horizon. A 0.67 reading means WW Grainger and PACCAR have partial price overlap, providing moderate risk reduction when paired.
| 0.74 | WLFC | Willis Lease Finance Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
| 0.81 | FERG | Ferguson Plc | PairCorr |
| 0.82 | AIT | Applied Industrial | PairCorr |
Mean reversion in WW Grainger's price occurs when temporary dislocations correct back toward its historical intrinsic value estimate. This tendency of WW Grainger's price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion. Whether book value, historical earnings multiple, or sector median, the reference point matters for WW Grainger's analysis.
WW Grainger Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between WW Grainger and its competitors provides context for understanding whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. When interpreted alongside fundamentals, correlation analysis separates broad industry exposure from company-specific behavior before additional capital is allocated across the peer group.
Please upgrade your account to get full access to Macroaxis premium features
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Return momentum in GWW Stock is more useful when tested against peer-relative fundamentals and risk. Peer-relative risk metrics add context on drawdown behavior, consistency, and return quality. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FERG | 1.54 | -0.06 | 0.00 | -0.04 | 0.00 | 4.19 | 9.33 | |||
| FAST | 1.37 | -0.06 | 0.00 | -0.06 | 0.00 | 2.79 | 12.40 | |||
| AME | 1.28 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 1.54 | 2.87 | 7.98 | |||
| ROP | 1.25 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 1.83 | 3.12 | 7.56 | |||
| FER | 1.48 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 1.65 | 3.24 | 9.24 | |||
| CARR | 1.98 | 0.22 | 0.06 | -0.64 | 2.89 | 5.14 | 14.89 | |||
| PAYX | 1.56 | -0.04 | 0.00 | -0.23 | 0.00 | 3.15 | 7.04 | |||
| ROK | 1.78 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 2.06 | 4.56 | 8.59 | |||
| OTIS | 1.29 | -0.17 | 0.00 | -0.26 | 0.00 | 2.28 | 10.36 | |||
| PCAR | 1.31 | -0.17 | 0.00 | -0.15 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 11.03 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is what remains after all costs — operating expenses, interest, taxes, and preferred dividends — are deducted from WW Grainger's total revenue. The relationship between net income growth and revenue growth at WW Grainger reveals whether margin expansion is driving earnings or whether top-line growth is being consumed by rising costs and financing charges.Compare WW Grainger and related stocks such as Ferguson Plc, Fastenal, and Ametek Inc Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FERG | 46.6 M | 89.5 M | 444.1 M | 852.1 M | 332.3 M | 870.8 M | 920 M | 1.3 B | 1.1 B | 961 M | 1.5 B | 2.1 B | 1.9 B | 1.7 B | 1.9 B | 2.1 B | 2.2 B |
| FAST | 1.7 M | 357.9 M | 420.5 M | 448.6 M | 494.1 M | 516.4 M | 499.4 M | 578.6 M | 751.9 M | 790.9 M | 859.1 M | 925 M | 1.1 B | 1.2 B | 1.2 B | 1.3 B | 1.3 B |
| AME | 34.9 M | 384.5 M | 459.1 M | 517 M | 584.5 M | 590.9 M | 512.2 M | 681.5 M | 777.9 M | 861.3 M | 872.4 M | 990.1 M | 1.2 B | 1.3 B | 1.4 B | 1.5 B | 1.6 B |
| ROP | 4.9 M | 427.2 M | 483.4 M | 538.3 M | 646 M | 696.1 M | 658.6 M | 971.8 M | 944.4 M | 1.8 B | 949.7 M | 1.1 B | 1.2 B | 1.4 B | 1.5 B | 1.5 B | 1.6 B |
| FER | -23.1 M | 1.2 B | 692 M | 727 M | 402 M | 720 M | 376 M | 454 M | -448 M | 268 M | -424 M | 1.2 B | 188 M | 460 M | 3.2 B | 888 M | 640.1 M |
| CARR | 1.2 B | 1.2 B | 1.2 B | 1.2 B | 1.2 B | 1.2 B | 1.2 B | 1.2 B | 2.7 B | 2.1 B | 2 B | 1.7 B | 3.5 B | 1.4 B | 5.6 B | 1.5 B | 2.7 B |
| PAYX | 4.2 M | 548 M | 569 M | 627.5 M | 674.9 M | 756.8 M | 817.3 M | 933.7 M | 1 B | 1.1 B | 1.1 B | 1.4 B | 1.6 B | 1.7 B | 1.7 B | 1.9 B | 2 B |
| ROK | 595.3 M | 737 M | 756.3 M | 826.8 M | 827.6 M | 729.7 M | 825.7 M | 535.5 M | 695.8 M | 1 B | 1.4 B | 932.2 M | 1.4 B | 952.5 M | 869 M | 999.4 M | 693.1 M |
| OTIS | 636 M | 636 M | 636 M | 636 M | 636 M | 636 M | 636 M | 636 M | 1 B | 1.1 B | 906 M | 1.2 B | 1.3 B | 1.4 B | 1.6 B | 1.4 B | 1.3 B |
| PCAR | 72.9 M | 1 B | 1.1 B | 1.2 B | 1.4 B | 1.6 B | 521.7 M | 1.7 B | 2.2 B | 2.4 B | 1.3 B | 1.9 B | 3 B | 4.6 B | 4.2 B | 2.4 B | 2.5 B |
WW Grainger Competitive Analysis
WW Grainger competes directly with Ferguson Plc, Fastenal, and Ametek, and the financial data points to clear areas of divergence. On scale alone, WW Grainger's 58.41 B valuation and 17.94 B revenue define its weight class. A 46.10% return on equity and 9.51% net margin underscore WW Grainger's earnings capacity. Ferguson Plc pulls in 30.76 B in revenue while WW Grainger reports 17.94 B. On the bottom line, Fastenal retains 15.39% while WW Grainger manages 9.51%. On equity returns, WW Grainger earns 46.10% compared to 14.63% at Ametek.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
WW Grainger Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze WW Grainger Against Peers
WW Grainger's peer analysis compares WW Grainger with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether WW Grainger trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where WW Grainger leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
WW Grainger's beta is lower than the peer group average, meaning its stock tends to swing less during broad market moves. Peer positioning is presented for easier comparison at a glance. For peer comparison, WW Grainger has a market cap of 58.41 billion, P/E of 21.14, profit margin of 9.51%.
WW Grainger metrics are compiled from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and normalized before display. Where analyst coverage exists, consensus estimates are factored in.
Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Rifka Kats, Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board