This module uses fundamental data of Staffing 360 to approximate its Piotroski F score. Staffing 360 F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Staffing 360 Solutions. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Staffing 360 financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out Staffing 360 Altman Z Score, Staffing 360 Correlation, Staffing 360 Valuation, as well as analyze Staffing 360 Alpha and Beta and Staffing 360 Hype Analysis.
Staffing
Piotroski F Score
Market Cap
Enterprise Value
Average Payables
Change In Working Capital
Other Non Cash Items
Capital Expenditures
Net Income
Change In Cash
Free Cash Flow
Total Cash From Operating Activities
Total Cash From Financing Activities
End Period Cash Flow
Stock Based Compensation
Begin Period Cash Flow
Other Cashflows From Financing Activities
Depreciation
Change To Account Receivables
Change To Liabilities
Sale Purchase Of Stock
Investments
Change Receivables
Net Borrowings
Total Cashflows From Investing Activities
Cash And Cash Equivalents Changes
Cash Flows Other Operating
Change To Operating Activities
Other Cashflows From Investing Activities
Change To Netincome
Change To Inventory
Dividends Paid
Issuance Of Capital Stock
Total Current Liabilities
Retained Earnings
Common Stock Total Equity
Common Stock Shares Outstanding
Total Liab
Total Assets
Short Long Term Debt Total
Other Current Liab
Total Stockholder Equity
Net Debt
Accounts Payable
Cash
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity
Non Current Liabilities Total
Other Stockholder Equity
Total Current Assets
Short Term Debt
Common Stock
Other Liab
Current Deferred Revenue
Cash And Short Term Investments
Net Receivables
Good Will
Other Current Assets
Property Plant And Equipment Gross
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Intangible Assets
Property Plant Equipment
Net Tangible Assets
Property Plant And Equipment Net
Non Current Assets Total
Non Currrent Assets Other
Other Assets
Long Term Debt
Retained Earnings Total Equity
Long Term Debt Total
Capital Surpluse
Short Long Term Debt
Non Current Liabilities Other
Preferred Stock Total Equity
Inventory
Net Invested Capital
Net Working Capital
Capital Stock
Capital Lease Obligations
Interest Expense
Selling General Administrative
Other Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Ebit
Depreciation And Amortization
Gross Profit
Ebitda
Cost Of Revenue
Total Operating Expenses
Income Before Tax
Total Other Income Expense Net
Income Tax Expense
Total Revenue
Net Income From Continuing Ops
Non Recurring
Non Operating Income Net Other
Net Income Applicable To Common Shares
Minority Interest
Tax Provision
Preferred Stock And Other Adjustments
Net Interest Income
Reconciled Depreciation
Probability Of Bankruptcy
At this time, Staffing 360's Short and Long Term Debt is most likely to increase significantly in the upcoming years. The Staffing 360's current Net Debt To EBITDA is estimated to increase to 14.33, while Net Debt is projected to decrease to roughly 31.1 M. The current Average Payables is estimated to decrease to about 2.2 M
At this time, it appears that Staffing 360's Piotroski F Score is Unavailable. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Staffing 360 is to make sure Staffing is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Staffing 360's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Staffing 360's financial numbers are properly reported.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Staffing 360's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Staffing 360 in a much-optimized way.
F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.
Book Value Per Share
43.18
At this time, Staffing 360's Book Value Per Share is most likely to decrease significantly in the upcoming years.
Staffing 360 ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Staffing 360's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Staffing 360's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social
About Staffing 360 Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Staffing 360 Solutions's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Staffing 360 using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Staffing 360 Solutions based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
When determining whether Staffing 360 Solutions is a strong investment it is important to analyze Staffing 360's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Staffing 360's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Staffing Stock, refer to the following important reports:
You can also try the Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.
Is Human Resource & Employment Services space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Staffing 360. If investors know Staffing will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Staffing 360 listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
(0.94)
Earnings Share
(36.60)
Revenue Per Share
255.284
Quarterly Revenue Growth
(0.09)
Return On Assets
(0.11)
The market value of Staffing 360 Solutions is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Staffing that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Staffing 360's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Staffing 360's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Staffing 360's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Staffing 360's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Staffing 360's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Staffing 360 is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Staffing 360's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.