Hagerty Competitors
| HGTY Stock | USD 10.06 -0.24 -2.33% |
Correlation: Hagerty vs Texas Capital View
Poor diversification
Across the chosen horizon, Hagerty and Texas Capital show a correlation of 0.6 and fall into the Poor diversification bucket. The overlap area shows the portion of risk diversified away by holding both instruments together.
The concept of mean reversion suggests that Hagerty's price will eventually return toward its long-run average. Positions sized too aggressively against the trend often suffer sustained losses before reversion occurs in Hagerty. The mean reversion framework for Hagerty is built on the premise that markets are not perfectly efficient.
Hagerty Competition Correlation Matrix
Reviewing how Hagerty moves relative to competing stocks can show whether peer exposure is reducing portfolio risk or simply repeating the same market bet. This matrix is most informative when seeking to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
Please upgrade your account to get full access to Macroaxis premium features
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Evaluating Hagerty Stock requires separating price momentum from underlying operating strength versus competitors. Risk-adjusted metrics help compare Hagerty's efficiency and downside exposure against peers on a like-for-like basis. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCY | 1.44 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.20 | 2.12 | 2.34 | 12.12 | |||
| AHL | 3.38 | -1.12 | 0.00 | 1.32 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 97.73 | |||
| SIGI | 1.24 | -0.06 | 0.00 | -0.16 | 0.00 | 2.60 | 10.95 | |||
| FG | 2.20 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 3.64 | 4.51 | 16.20 | |||
| CNO | 1.06 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 1.61 | 2.19 | 10.01 | |||
| AGO | 1.00 | -0.21 | 0.00 | -0.36 | 0.00 | 1.50 | 5.62 | |||
| TFSL | 1.05 | 0.09 | 0.07 | -0.61 | 1.33 | 2.37 | 8.17 | |||
| CRVL | 1.44 | 0.27 | 0.14 | -0.93 | 1.74 | 3.09 | 7.78 | |||
| PJT | 1.33 | -0.07 | 0.00 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 3.22 | 8.73 | |||
| TCBI | 1.32 | -0.07 | 0.00 | -0.06 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 9.70 |
Hagerty Competitive Analysis
Placing Hagerty next to Mercury General, Aspen Insurance, and Selective Insurance puts raw numbers into competitive context. A 3.46 B valuation paired with 1.46 B in revenue sets the baseline. Profitability stands at a 2.85% net margin with return on equity reaching 20.91%. Profit margins tilt toward Mercury General at 13.69% against Hagerty at 2.85%. Aspen Insurance leads on revenue, 3.12 B to 1.46 B. Hagerty leads with 20.91% return on equity versus 13.27% for Selective Insurance.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Hagerty Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Hagerty Against Peers
Hagerty's peer analysis compares Hagerty with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Hagerty trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Hagerty leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Insider ownership at Hagerty is higher than at most peers, which can align management incentives with shareholder interests. Customer concentration risk differs across Hagerty's peer group, which affects earnings stability in a downturn. Competition analysis enriches price action by grounding it in relative fundamentals. For peer comparison, Hagerty has a market cap of 3.46 billion, profit margin of 2.85%.
Hagerty figures are aggregated from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and normalized across reporting formats. Professional analyst research is incorporated when coverage is available.
Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Raphi Shpitalnik, Junior Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board